Opposing Oppression Of Satyagraha

Improved Essays
Being killed, injured, or even arrested for proposing ideas for the government is something horrible. The Indians were suffering from these examples by the British. One day, a man with the name of Mohandas Gandhi, decided to help India to gain independence with a method he used called satyagraha. Satyagraha is a way of opposing oppression respectfully without violence. Unfortunately, the satyagraha did not end well in India so it was not an effective way of opposing oppression. The protesters were killed and injured during the protests, which was sickening. A great amount of people have been arrested in the process. Since the British were stubborn, they did not respect the protesting, in fact, they arrested Mohandas Gandhi for being the reason for this “chaos” against the British. The Satyagraha is not an effective way of opposing oppression because it created more problems such as, protesters being killed, protesters being arrested, and the British being stubborn and not respecting the movement. …show more content…
The British did not like how people protested, as a result they killed some people and injured a great deal. The British injured innumerable amounts of people, the way they were injured was quite obnoxious. “One American reporter counted over three hundred protesters injured and two killed” (Watson Institute 14). The infuriated British killed a couple of blameless protesters and injured countless. It was very hostile and rude as they were disrespecting the Indians. The American reporter said that people were injured and killed. It is very evident that the Satyagraha was not a good idea, its results were unpleasant. Despite the fact that the British killed and injured the Indians, they also jailed many of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    How did Gandhi salt the lion’s tail? Born Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, Gandhi was a leader of the Indian nationalism in British ruled India. His culture and religion was very peaceful and he too was peaceful, this peace was always tested by the British rule in India. The British taxed the water where the Indians would get there salt from, Gandhi believed that this was an unjust law and decided to protest against this law. What made Gandhi’s non-violent movement work ?…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Instead of utilizing violence against aggressors, Gandhi and King chose to retaliate against unjust laws nonviolently. These social reformers achieved this by nonviolent methods such as satyagraha and civil disobedience. After the British’s demeaning laws and taxes, Gandhi led multiple movements with the use of satyagraha to abolish them. Similarly, King organized a complete boycott of buses to promote his cause until the government had changed their ways. Although having subtle differences, these two methods provided their causes significant strength without the use of weapons or brutality.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi Dbq

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “To deprive a man of his natural liberty and to deny to him the ordinary amenities of life is worse than starving the body; it is starvation of the soul, the dweller in the body.” This is a quote by Mahatma Gandhi, which shows what the British did to the Indians by taking away their natural liberty. Mahatma Gandhi was not the only one that had fought against the British in order to gain back this natural liberty. There were many nationalist groups that formed during the time Britain ruled over India. Some of them were the Indian National Army, the Indian National Congress, the Hindu Mahasabha, and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Non Violence Essay

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gandhi sent a letter to the english governor in India before his major march to tell him that although he is participating in civil disobedience he wouldn't intentionally hurt anyone and that his goal is to get British people to become an ally to the cause (Document 1). This act of civil disobedience helped to bring attention to the unfair treatment of indians and in fact did bring in British allies in to help with the cause. In Atlanta, Georgia over 200 students took part in a lunch counter sit in with the intent to integrate lunch counters and bring attention to the issue of racial injustice (Document 2). Civil disobedience brought light to issues some may not have seen as a problem prior to the event. Acts of civil disobedience made it so there were more allies to help a…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malcom X, an American Muslim Minister and rights activist, once said that “You are not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you cannot face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it.” He is speaking of a term called civil disobedience, the active refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of the government, or of an occupying international power. Civil disobedience is used by influential “rebels” all over the world and throughout history. Many people have different opinions on whether civil disobedience is important or not.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bal Gangadhar Tilak publicly spoke out against their oppression with speeches calling for no more ¨fighting beyond the frontiers of India with Indian blood and money¨ (Document 6). The independence movement began peaceful but as Britain continually abused their resources and people the movement became violent. The Sepoy mutiny began after the British forced the Indians to use a weapon which required them to use a meat that was against their religion. When they refused Indians began to attack British soldiers to try and force them to leave. After the mutiny failed Mohandas K. Gandhi advocated for ¨passive resistance¨ or ¨securing rights by personal suffering,¨ to achieve Indian self-rule (Document 7).…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay Thoreau or Gandhi- Who makes the better point? In 1849 Henry David Thoreau wrote about the need for change in the U.S. Government in his essay titled “Civil Disobedience”. Thoreau wrote this because he saw fault in his government that took his tax dollars, yet did not oppose the “political and moral evil” of slavery. Likewise, in 1916 Mahatma Gandhi wrote “On Civil Disobedience” after having been beaten and jailed for what he calls “arbitrary laws” in South Africa.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: The barbaric acts committed by the British allowed a belief of justice through non-violence which could attract anyone in which Gandhi’s passive resistance movement proved be successful. The belief of justice strengthened Gandhi’s followers by allowing them to disobey laws which were against their beliefs. In Document A which is titled Mohamdas Gandhi on Religion, the main points are two quotes that he has said. The two quotes refer to his views on his beliefs and what he believes the goal of religion to be.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ones life is a result of the choices one makes. If oneself doesn’t enjoy ones life, its time to start making better choices. Freedom is a very powerful two syllable word. Freedom is the right to act, speak, think or believe as one wants. No restraints or judgement should come with freedom.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oppression of Women There are many diverse forms of oppression on women that prevents women from having equal rights. One form of oppression on women is education. Education is essential to both genders because it gives them insight, knowledge, stigma, and broadens their perspective. Without education, it prevents both genders from their freedom of expression and intellectual liberation.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ghandi's campaign for independence went on, with his encouragement of peaceful protest and criticism of British administration and taxes. In 1921, Ghandi called for all Indians to boycott paying taxes on farming tools to the British, a strategy to have a negative effect on the economy. His non-cooperation campaign, despite its nonviolent aims, periodically became violent, and Ghandi was imprisoned in 1922 for instigating the movement. He was released two years later. The movement, however, was quite successful in terms of uniting the country in a movement under one leader (Masselos, 138, 1972), joined by their resentment of British rule.…

    • 6598 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the British helped to modernized India, the British should apologize for the actions they took against the Indians during the Raj because the British killed and injured thousands of people, who were not fighting back, promote tensions between Hindu and Muslim that promoted violence, and did not care about what was best for the Indian population. A group of Indians were in an enclosed courtyard practicing peaceful protest, when a British military officer was told to shut the protest down. Instead of telling everyone to leave or even issuing a warning, the British soldiers shot into the crowd, killing more than a thousand men, women, and children; this was named the Amritsar Massacre. Kamal Mitra Chenoy says regarding the Amritsar Massacre,…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This movement was very successful, this led to an indian mob setting a british police station on fire leaving the 22 inside dead, Gandhi soon called off the movement as it started to result to violence. In 1919 a massacre took place in which british soldiers blocked the only exit to Jallianwala Bagh then took on a crowd of nonviolent protesters leaving about 1000 people dead, so Gandhi took matters into his own hands and…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sedition Essay

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything- George Bernard Shaw The provision of sedition is an archaic law now. It had its relevance in the colonial era when India was not a democracy and all the laws were made with the sole motive of domineering the people. That era is over.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1919 to 1922, British government applied some brutal laws for the people of British India like Rowlett act and incident of Jallianwala Bagh had leaved so many pains. Therefore these incidents lead to the protest of two separate issues and emerged them into a one platform. These two movements were Khilafat movement from Muslims and Non-Cooperative movement from Hindus. Although Khilafat movement is a sentimental issue towards the Muslims and Not connected directly to the politics of India but these two movements lead two the biggest protest In the history of British India and showed the Hindu Muslim Unity yet Again.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays