Operation Geronimo Case Analysis

Improved Essays
LEGAL AUTHORITY
Even though there was a risk that bin Laden was not in the compound, yes, president Obama had the legal authority to order Operation Geronimo. Because he had the inherent right to defend the country and he was a high priority target that organized an attack on our country.

INTRODUCTION
When president Obama ordered Operation Geronimo to capture or kill Osama bin Laden there were some critics that claimed he didn’t have the legal right to do so. I disagree because he was acting, in what he thought, was the best interest to the American people. He had the inherent right to self-defense for our country. After the 9-11 attack on America bin Laden became a high priority target after he claimed responsibility for the attack. And
…show more content…
According the United Nations Charter chapter VII: Actions with respects to threats to the peace, breaches of peace, and acts of aggression A nation has the right to defend themselves from acts of aggression. Article 51 states” Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security” (2017). This gives the president of the United States of America the right to defend our country against any further attacks by the parties that claimed responsibility for those actions on 9-11. By utilizing the charter of the United Nations and the backing of our own government president Obama could defend our nation in a legal manner and in the good graces of the UN. With approval of over 90% of the American people he also had their intentions in mind as well and acted in a way that would bring them peace and justice for the tragedy that took place in our nation on September 11, 2001. This action brought a bit of closure to the families most impacted by the attack who lose their loved ones on that …show more content…
According to the United nations, NATO and the Geneva conventions president Obama had the legal authority to order the mission. He had the right to defend our country from Osama bin Laden who was a high priority target and enemy of the United States that threatened more attacks on our country. And finally, he had the legal authority to protect us from future attacks by showing our countries ability to defend itself and seek justice no matter the cost. It is because of these reasons I feel he had the legal and moral right to order Operation Geronimo and seek out justice on bin

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Cause Of War Analysis

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With no state willing to back Iraq militarily, the United States was free to attack Iraq without fear of a large scale response” (Goldstein & Peevehouse 2014). This statement attributes to the fact that the U.S. having a powerful globally military no other state nation wanted to aid Iraq militarily due to the fear of opposing the U.S. and have to deal with the U.S. militarily. Such actions by an opposing state might reflect unfavorable for that state due to the possibility of future alliances in which they would want to enlist the U.S support to aid in some crises which could very well be terrorism. The reluctance of other states to become involved allowed the U.S. to invade Iraq on its own terms to win the war on…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The militia will not threaten the people of America, citizens are armed as well as to protect their land and balance the power. The second amendment does not lead to senseless fighting, it leads our peace “To be prepared for war is the most effectual means of preserving peace.” George Washington stated. The second amendment allows America to have a standing militia, this militia protects American freedom from those who wish to take it. If history has taught us anything, it is that “Freedom is not free”. Millions have given their lives in order to protect American freedom because they realize it is better to die protecting freedom than to live under…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, following the attacks, the United States used international law to its advantage in order to support its cause (Hurrell, 2002, p. 192). For example, the United States justified the invasion of Afghanistan and the use of force on the basis of self-defense, obtained through the Security Council (Hurrell, 2002, p. 189). The United States interpreted the term self-defense in an unconventional way. It focused on the 9/11 attacks which would be acceptable. However, using self-defense as a justification for future possible threats is a new take on this concept.…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But it is a necessary statement to understand, nonetheless. America would not have a purpose if it were not for trying to seduce other countries into its way of thinking. Wilson’s Fourteen Points would eventually go on to creating a nation “committed to the principles of liberal democracy and free enterprise...the values distinguishing the United States itself (Bacevich, 11). Bacevich argues how that same Wilsonian paradigm is still present in our society today. After the catastrophe of September 11, President George W. Bush would go on to show that he also believed it was America’s destiny to rid mankind of “the darkness” present in our world (Bacevich, 12).…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bin Laden’s is partly a justification of the attacks and the war raging on, as well as a warning. Bin laden starts out saying that his country and people do not hate freedom, or security. They do not want to be under oppression or under control they want freedom, their own view of freedom not Americas. He talks about how America has laid waste to their country therefore they will lay waste to America. Then he goes on to talk about justification for the acts of terror they did because of what America has done.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The elastic clause was a major factor in the establishment of the Patriot Act. The elastic clause allows the United States government to overlook certain rights and privileges of citizens as long as the act or law can be proven “necessary and proper”. The United States Patriot Act, of course, was formed with this in mind because without the elastic clause, the government would have never been able to neglect such significant rights of citizens who are not to blame in the terrorist attacks that have previously occurred in the…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to President Obama (2011), “Adherence to those core values—respecting human rights, fostering good governance, respecting privacy and civil liberties, committing to security and transparency, and upholding the rule of law—enables us to build broad international coalitions to act against the common threat posed by our adversaries while further delegitimizing, isolating, and weakening their efforts”, p. (4). This guideline is what we use to continue our counter terrorism efforts. One of the core value that he mention is respecting human rights, we continue our fight for terrorism for we all believe that terrorism is a violation of human rights. They do not chose what gender, age and religion the terrorist launch their attack and destroy a mass population. Part of our counter terrorism effort is protecting the human rights from any act of violence from the terrorist.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In paragraph 33, he says “Not only will we fight for democracy, we will make it more worth fighting for…we will work for the good of mankind…so that all may have plenty and security.” This quote was a good example of why the United States should help in the war. He states that it will be a good deed to do rather than bad as many Americans perceive the wars. His claim was the United States needs to help our allies defeat the Nazis. The reason was to protect the freedom, country, and democracy for both Britain and the United…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iraq War Realism

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bush took control of the situation by deciding to invade Iraq. Realism is effective in this argument because it displays the capability, military power and resources that showed US were the dominant powers in the world. United States had worked hard to gain hegemony through war victories and they were not going to let an attack like 9/11 bring the status of the state down. Critics may say that war should not happen just because of self-interest which in this case is maintaining the hegemony. I argue that realist believe that the only way to maintain hegemony is to use authoritative power which is the only way to maintain peace.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rather, government acts to prevent criminals, thugs, militiamen and assorted lunatics from abusing the 2nd Amendment privilege, as it protects that privilege for law-abiding sportsmen and other citizens” (Pettit). The president is the head of the nation’s intelligence hierarchy, including the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Counsel, National Security Agency, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. These provide the United States with the top protection against invasion and domestic violence. The Government has the right to send troops merely to enforce federal judicial order or to protect federally guaranteed civil rights. In our government, it is their duty to protect and enlarge our freedom.…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays