Opening Statement Analysis

Improved Essays
B. Opening Statements
Opening statements permit both the prosecutor and defense attorney the opportunity to present their interpretation of the events; these statements typically are summarized and do not include witnesses or evidence. However, the prosecutor composes the opening statement initially because the Government has the burden of proving the respondent perpetrated the crime. (United States Attorneys, 2015)
C. Presentment of Cases
Witness Examination Subsequent to the opening statements, the prosecutor initiates direct examination of the first of the witnesses; this is the prosecutor’s initial step in attempting to prove the case, and the duration may possibly be from a few minutes to several days. Throughout direct examination,
…show more content…
It is the government's obligation to prove the respondent perpetrated the offense as specified in the arraignment. If the respondent decides not to testify or does not put on any evidence, the jury may not consider this as evidence the respondent committed the crime and is guilty merely because they did not put on a defense; the decision to put on a defense is solely up to the respondent and the defense counsel. Though, the defense will typically present its own account of the case. (United States Attorneys, …show more content…
The judge determines the conclusion of an objection; either sustains so that the action discontinues, or overrules which permits the action to continue.
E. Closing Arguments
Once the defense’s direct testimony and cross examination by the prosecutor of all the witnesses is completed, the defense rests, and the prosecuting attorney and defense counsel prepare for closing arguments. (United States Attorneys, 2015)
Closing arguments are the final opportunity for the prosecutor and the defense attorney to communicate to the jury; these arguments permit both lawyers to recapitulate the testimony and evidence, and request the jury to return a verdict of guilty or not guilty.
F. Jury Instructions
Subsequent the closing arguments, the magistrate charges the jury, or advises them of the appropriate law and of what must perform to attain a verdict.
G. Jury Deliberations & Announcement of the Verdict
Subsequent to being charged, the jury leaves into deliberation, the procedure of determining whether a respondent is guilty or not guilty; throughout this process, no one connected with the trial can communicate the jury without the magistrate and attorneys. If the jury has uncertainty regarding the law, they must write a letter to the magistrate, who will then read the letter in court with all parties

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Summary Of In Re Gault

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    During the adjudicatory process, there are usually two judicial hearings that the juvenile attends. The first is the initial appearance, is the equivalent of arraignment where the juvenile is notified of the charges against them, they are appointed legal counsel and bail is considered. If the case has not been settled by the close of the initial appearance, it is held for trial. In re Gault is the case that changed the nature of juvenile trials forever. In 1967, the United States Supreme Court ruled that defendants must be afforded the same rights as adults.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main concept of a voir dire is to determine whether a jury can be “fair, impartial arbiters of fact”. Potential jurors usually are selected from voter registration records for what is commonly referred to as jury duty. In the U.S., they must be from the same jurisdiction as the defendant. After a pool of potential jurors is selected, attorneys for both sides either suggest questions for the judge to ask, or they ask questions themselves of the jurors. The attorneys for both sides have a limited amount of “peremptory challenges,” with which they can bypass the judge and dismiss possible jurors for any reason.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the hearing trial the defense relied objections in an attempt to get the prosecution’s examination questions of the witness thrown out. The defense heavily relied on objecting the relevance and foundation of questions asked by the prosecution. The Hearing Officer occasionally made the prosecution re-phrase question making them more specific, but ultimately the objections did not make a significant impact. I believe the defense did not have much of a case and therefore their reliance on objections was their only hope in defending Detective McDermott. I would not have relied to heavily on objections, especially when they appeared to be reaching, but this was the strategy utilized.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first case viewed was a defendant accused of 6 counts of obtaining property by false pretenses. The case went very quick and I didn’t really understand what was happening. I was distracted by the young lady from earlier who re-appeared and sat down right in front of me. She turned around and asked what we were going to school for. I mentioned Social work…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    more likely as use of weapons, and the victim being young as well as it being a relative or acquaintance or intimate partner and if an injury was involved. Using a weapon and injury makes this crime a more violent and serious offense that could get prosecuted to the highest level. When young victims are involved can also be a reason that the charges may be increased and the seriousness of the case increased so it is expected theses cases would be more willing to be practiced. The one that does not go along with common belief is if it was an intimate partner or acquaintance. Being intimate partner or aquatic takes away the stranger danger belief that many people fear.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Cousin Vinny Analysis

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, Vinny accredited this to his superb persuasion skills rather than the fact that it is required for the opposing party to share relevant facts concerning the case. This is due to the 1963 Supreme Court Case Brady v. Maryland, which ruled that Due Process requires defendants to be given any exculpatory information, commonly referred to an “open file” policy. Discovery refers to the entitlement each party has to receive information that the opposing side has in possession, thus preventing surprises in court. An example of this was when the D.A. called his own expert witness in automobiles and Vinny was not aware, yet the judge allowed it. Additionally, My Cousin Vinny was accurate in representing both the prosecution and defense's closing arguments, which refers to the fact that no more evidence will be presented because both sides have finished arguing.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prosecutorial Misconduct has always been a problem in the courtroom. Prosecutors tend to misuse evidence and go against someone that may be innocent. That innocent person’s life could be turned upside down for something they didn’t even do. Imagine being blamed for your significant other’s murder, and then being sentenced to life in prison just for someone to uncover evidence that you didn’t do it after ten years! This would all have been caused by prosecutorial misconduct.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A Few Good Men” as Related to Concepts Learned The film “A Few Good Men” (acquired for the Eiche Library) revolves around the criminal law branch of the court-martial of two U.S. Marines charged with murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and conduct unbecoming a Marine. The storyline shares the trials and tribulations experienced by their lawyers assigned to defend them as they prepare for the case. The film illustrates the various phases of criminal procedure from arraignment, plea bargaining, to the trial itself and depicts the usual cast of courtroom individuals: defendants, Lance Corporal Harold Dawson (Wolfgang Bodison) and Private First Class Louden Downey (James Marshall); defense council, Lieutenant Daniel Kaffee (Tom Cruise),…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitutional Amendment and Miranda October 28, 2015 Argosy University, Atlanta Hicks, Sandra, Student Constitutional Amendment and Miranda The Supreme Court case law makes up the majority of what is called, The Constitutional Law and according to the rule of stare decis, the judges must make decisions that are directed by cases that were previously settled. The Bill of Rights and its’ amendments to the Constitution were developed to protect the rights and the freedom of every individual in the United States.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I went to Kings County Supreme Court. Its located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn NY at September 21 at 2:30 pm to 4:40 pm under Honor Francois A. Rivera from Part 52. The case type was civil and type of the proceedings is a trial. There were 8 jurors in the stand. Mostly male and about 2 females juror.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The prosecutors are considered to be the most influential actors within the courthouse, as they decide which case to prosecute, the cases to plea-bargain, and the case to try. The prosecutor may also influence the factors of setting bail and creating the sentence. In the United States Constitution, one’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel is granted as many defendants cannot afford to hire a lawyer, they are provided a public defender also known as the defense attorney. The defense attorneys encourage their clients to think about how the jury will assess them as guilty beyond reasonable doubt, therefore most will plead guilt. The judge plays a major authority role in the criminal justice system whether it is in state courts, or larger courts.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This process is really important because coming out with the solution like this one requires a very detail and cautious process.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal defense attorneys are skilled professionals who have experience defending their clients against serious felony or misdemeanor criminal charges. The best criminal defense professionals have completed years of education in the law and criminal defense fields and they have hundreds of hours of real-world courtroom experience facing aggressive prosecutors. When faced with a criminal complaint, the defendant must know how to find the best defense team available in order to increase their odds of an acquittal, favorable plea bargain or 'not guilty' verdict. According to Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Tommy Adler, his goal within the courtroom is always to present his client as more than just the charges facing him and to convince the…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should There Any Judgement Limitation of Testimonial in Social Media ? Social medias are computer-mediated tools that allow people or companies to create, share, or exchange information, career interests, ideas, and pictures/videos in virtual communities and networks. Social media is a wonderful channel for brands to engage with their target tribe.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays