Should the united states continue to elect its president through the electoral college system? To ease some of the tension with this decision let me lay down some facts and information. In a presidential election, the popular vote simply means an aggregate of all voters from all states in America. The candidate who gets the most votes nationwide is said to have won the popular vote. But the winner of the popular vote may end up losing the election, like “Al Gore did in 2000 and Hillary Clinton in 2016.…
The Electoral College should be replaced by the popular vote because…
The electoral college should be abolished because it does not represent what the people…
The Electoral College should be changed based on somethings and abolished on other things. The Electoral college should be changed/abolished because the electoral college voting is unfair, Hamilton said the population was to incompetent to choose a countries leader, because of the 270 rule, and it so a multi party system flourish. If Wyoming wants Trump as a president and the members of the electoral college for the state want clinton and the whole state end up going democratic that would not be fair for the citizens. Because Wyoming has 563,626 residents and only 3 electoral members (Document #2) then it should be the citizens who solely decide who they want without the college to decide with the winner takes all system.…
One main pro of the electoral college, said by defenders of the system, is that it is, “a healthier constitutional form that values the capacity to carry numerous,” political ideals across the nation. Secondly, the electoral college system, “[requires] candidates to assemble multistate and multi regional coalitions rather than focusing,” on large states and urban communities. In a direct election, the largest concentration of voters would be in the large states and in dense metropolitan areas. One main con of the electoral college is that though the small states are overrepresented due to, “the senatorial bump, some persuasive legitimating principle other than the fact that the framers endorsed the idea,” should continue to exist today, but does not (Rakove). According to Gallup Poll in 2011, 62% of americans preferred a popular vote system for electing the president, while “barely a third, 35%, say they would keep the electoral college” (Inc).…
The Electoral College should be abolished because: smaller states are over represented, it is undemocratic, and it violates political equality. The Electoral College should be archaic. Essentially, there happens to be no need for it. It was established on basis of that people did not know what or who they were voting for and voted just because they could. Now-a-days, people transpire to be further educated and are able to establish the right decision on who the president should be.…
Dear State Senator, the electoral college is an obsolete system of election. Although the electoral college was an idea set by the founding fathers in the constitution, this form of election is not effective any longer. People have the right to vote, but this form of election is not directly voting for a representative. The electoral college essentially makes the people vote for electors who then have the opportunity to vote for whom ever they would like. The electoral system is an archaic system that needs to be exchanged for the popular vote because the people do not vote for an actual representative, the system has failed before, and the system has the opportunity to have an even greater mishap.…
The Electoral College should be abolished. One reason why is that the system favors some citizens over others. To prove my point, if you were to take 12 states + DC, you would get a population total of 12,500,722, and an electoral vote total of 44. But, if you take a state, in this case, Illinois, that has a higher population,12,830,632, than the 12 states and DC, you get only 20 electoral votes. How does that make sense?…
During the 18th century a group of like minded women began fighting for, even when faced by near impossible odds and fierce opposition, the right to vote. During the nearly century long battle between the sexes, many tactics were implemented to make the opposition realize that the right to vote should be given to men and women alike (with some exceptions at the time). These tactics, which lead to the end of the women’s suffrage movement, could aid in the current movement of environmental activists and their attempt to combat and mitigate losses to the natural world. As seen in the movie, “One Woman, One Vote”, politicians needed to be on your side, connectivity and numbers were required, and innovative public engagement campaigns were necessary to make the changes society needed. Perhaps, once these fundamentals are more rigorously put to action within the environmental movements agenda, progress towards a less impacted and more conserved earth will be accelerated.…
Do you consider the Electoral College to be abolished or changed? The Electoral College should be kept the same because it protects the country and people from mischief and irresponsible voters, it looks at all the voters, and all states are equal. The Electoral College is there to protect us from mischief and irresponsible voter. There are just some voters who don’t care about politics and just picks one…
Abolishing the Electoral College: is it wise? Many people have no idea what the Electoral College is. Those that are informed tend to want it gone since it does not allow the people to have a single vote. It is definitely a weird system that the U.S. uses to elect a president.…
There is one vote for every member in the House of Representatives and two for the Senators. However, many believe that the Electoral College does not manifest the popular vote. The Electoral College should not be abolished because of the way it keeps the government and elections organized. Although the Electoral College is an archaic form of election, that does not mean that it is insufficient and should be abolished.…
Many have concluded that the Electoral College should be taken away completely or just in some states. There have been cases where Electoral College has actually been bad for us, but there has also been equal amount of times were it worked in are favor. There have been a few cases where they try to abolish the Electoral College and even just remove it state wide. For example, in 2004 Colorado almost passed a bill that uses popular vote instead of the electoral votes. Another, case was in 2000 when an elector voted against the popular vote which hasn’t happen in over 100 years.…
The Electoral College was a system outlined in the United States’ constitution by the founding fathers, as the method in which they believe the president should be elected. But with the progression of time the views on the necessity of the Electoral College has become a controversy, as now two factions exist with one faction believing that the Electoral College is an illegitimate method for the election of a president. Though this faction exists and believes the Electoral College is an unfair system that gives a disproportionate voice to different United States’ citizens, but is it truly unfair and unjust. As the Electoral College is a part of the United States constitution where it can be found in Article II, Section I along with a few clarifications…
The Electoral College is in place to decide the president of the United States. There are people that agree on it and people that do not. The Electoral College System is an inadequate form of electing the president of the United States, there are better ways to go about choosing a president in a more Democratic way. Having a popular vote, or by deciding by congressional districts would be other options that Congress has thought about, and even states have signed in on being for a National Popular Vote. The Electoral College is a representation of the popular vote, on the other hand it makes it unfair at the same time.…