One Holy Night
In Sandra Cisneros’ One Holy Night, the speaker can be observed in many glows because of the unclear and sometimes conflicting statements made about her own feelings. However, the speaker regularly compares detail with literature when she knows the reality about Baby Boy. This allows the reader to achieve that she is unexperienced and cannot or does not request to know the effects of her “holy night.”
In the start of the story the speaker reflects on Baby Boy and then tells that she will express the reader everything as it occurred. Yet she previously has foolish the reader by revealing in the first lines of the story that his name is Chaq and he is from an ancient line of Mayan kings. The reader late finds out that both these statements are mistakes. After saying this, the speaker directly shares the detail about Abuelita chasing Baby Boy out of the house. The closeness of both detail and fiction in the opening paragraphs of the story directly rouse questions of the speaker’s character.
Directly following these two statements, the speaker assures herself that Chaq “would love me like a revolution.” However this is showed to be false later in the story when …show more content…
She does not calmly walk home or at a fast step, but runs the whole way home. Hugging oneself is an old-style way of retrieval ease after a disaster. Many children return to this fetal point when they cry. However the speaker’s next few lines advise a sense of pleasure because she wants to cry out that she is a part of past. Later speaker finds out she will not accept a son who will “bring back the grandeur” of the Mayan people. These incompatible emotional state that rise reveal that the speaker is young and does not completely understand what has occurred in her life. Her feelings spread the reader’s sense that she is young and only in eighth
In Sandra Cisneros’ One Holy Night, the speaker can be observed in many glows because of the unclear and sometimes conflicting statements made about her own feelings. However, the speaker regularly compares detail with literature when she knows the reality about Baby Boy. This allows the reader to achieve that she is unexperienced and cannot or does not request to know the effects of her “holy night.”
In the start of the story the speaker reflects on Baby Boy and then tells that she will express the reader everything as it occurred. Yet she previously has foolish the reader by revealing in the first lines of the story that his name is Chaq and he is from an ancient line of Mayan kings. The reader late finds out that both these statements are mistakes. After saying this, the speaker directly shares the detail about Abuelita chasing Baby Boy out of the house. The closeness of both detail and fiction in the opening paragraphs of the story directly rouse questions of the speaker’s character.
Directly following these two statements, the speaker assures herself that Chaq “would love me like a revolution.” However this is showed to be false later in the story when …show more content…
She does not calmly walk home or at a fast step, but runs the whole way home. Hugging oneself is an old-style way of retrieval ease after a disaster. Many children return to this fetal point when they cry. However the speaker’s next few lines advise a sense of pleasure because she wants to cry out that she is a part of past. Later speaker finds out she will not accept a son who will “bring back the grandeur” of the Mayan people. These incompatible emotional state that rise reveal that the speaker is young and does not completely understand what has occurred in her life. Her feelings spread the reader’s sense that she is young and only in eighth