On The Nature Of Things By Lucretius

Improved Essays
In his poem, On the Nature of Things, Lucretius aims to dispel our fear of death through the increased use of reason and knowledge rather than the authority we usually rely on to help make sense of death, which is ordinarily religion. However, rather than allay our fears about death, Lucretius argues that religion thrives off the fear of death and can even exacerbate that fear so that its followers believe that their own authority as the only possible answer. Lucretius’ poem offers a counterargument to religion’s perspective on death and argues against our irrational fear of it. The purpose of this essay is to show that the widespread fear of death is irrelevant, and that the correct feeling, according to Lucretius, and his idol Epicurus, is tranquility. In Epicurean philosophy, one can be unafraid of “death” because “death” is not the process of dying not the moment of death, both of which can be both physically and mentally damaging. “Death” instead means the act of being dead. If we believe that death involves no pleasure or pain and that the only thing in life that is bad is pain, then we can reason that death is not bad, since it doesn’t involve pain. Also, the disregard of death doesn’t imply an indifference to life. If finding pleasure is the purpose to one’s life, and one must be alive to experience pleasure, …show more content…
Lucretius doesn’t distinguish between the endless amount of time before you were born and the endless amount of time after you died. We do not spend much time fearing our pre-birth existence, therefore, we shouldn’t think not existing for an eternity after our deaths to be any different. The fear of death that people experience in life is a terror that only a living mind can feel. Since they are completely devoid of sensation and thought, a dead person cannot miss being

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    A few great questions have plagued humanity throughout the ages, all of which are impossible to answer. How did the world begin? How did we come to be? What happens when we die? It is human nature to be uncomfortable with unanswerable questions, and so different cultures developed their own mythologies to give them a sort of comfort in the face of the unknown.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the two texts that we read in class, Plato, Phaedo, and Lucretius, Nature of Things, both Socrates and Lucretius try to reassure us that we should not be afraid of death. In Plato, Phaedo, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates’s final hours from being their first hand. In Lucretius, Nature of Things, Lucretius’s telling his view on religious issues and how he got to his view, poetic skills, and study on scientific phenomena. Both Socrates and Lucretius have different arguments on why we should not be afraid of death. Socrates and Lucretius would have their own responses to each other 's argument if they were to reply to each other.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aztec Afterlife Beliefs

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Death has always been seen as the essence of misery, darkness, and evil. When people are exposed to the concept of dying, they are frightened, because death leads to lands that are unknown to man. Even though people do not understand it, the unknown world of the afterlife is assumed to be cold and lonely, an inescapable void. People, when they think of death, are reminded of how they lost their loved ones to it, how they have mourned those they will never be able to see again. However, while this is the widespread view of the afterlife, there are people who see death as a new beginning.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since Catholicism was a large part of medieval society and thought, its concept of Judgement Day inspired the speculation of death and the physical mechanics of resurrection – namely the importance of the physical human body and the role it played. A lengthy portion is dedicated to providing a historical narrative to provide context. Bynum proceeds to constantly jump back and forth between her two eras of focus and provides numerous philosophical and theological examples, listing off scholars and philosophers, their ideas and responses to each other, how they compare to their earlier and later counterparts, and so on. She uses these examples to illustrate newer concepts – such as reincarnation, mind-body dualism, and organ transplants – from the modern world bridge into this initially and seemingly small idea. Throughout, Bynum reiterates how there is no clear cut answer, which shows how much of a broad issue these medieval thinkers stumbled upon.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Lucretius in On The Nature Of Things, the power of nature and science relied on arbitrary mixtures and “indestructible particles” to create life and earthly systems in an limitless world. On the contrary, Darwin explores a variety of topics that portray life as being dependent on gradual changes, variations, competition, deity beliefs, morals, and natural selection. He asserts, “Natural selection, as we shall hereafter see, is a power incessantly ready for action” (Darwin page 108). Darwin acknowledges evolutionary theory and variations in various species while discussing concepts of natural selection in Origin of Species while Lucretius embraces the amazing strength of science in nature and space which is “infinite and measureless” in On The Nature of Things.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, naturally that cannot happen, death came, and he died, but his legacy remains. That’s the meaning of death, during the individual’s lifetime, one should appreciate, and live to their fullest, because with death comes, it means the book of one’s life has finally ended. To me, death is neccersary, is not something that should be avoided, because if there’s no death, it means there’s no new life. Although death might sound scary to most of the people, and no one wants to see their love one dying, but our society already taught us to accept death.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In many works of literature what happens after death is a common theme found throughout many different styles and authors. Through the analysis of Hamlet, Obasan, ¨The Open Boat,¨ and ¨The River Clarion¨ it is easy to see that many of the authors share similar views on mortality and how people should deal with it. I agreed with nearly every author, in different ways, but overall I feel that we should be able to accept death, but not spend our lives worrying about it. Instead we should spend our time making the most of our own lives, and being the best we can be, and as Hamlet believed, we should just let…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Epicurus: The Finality of Death Epicurus is a philosopher that has shaped today’s modern debate on the fear of death in philosophy, among other arguments. He has had a great deal of influence on Western thought and has continued to be a talked about philosopher in today’s world of philosophy. One idea that Epicurus vigilantly discusses in the text is about death being of no concern to us (Toop 228). Epicurus examines the “philosophy showing that death is the end of all consciousness [which] relieves us of all fear of death” (Toop 228). He is indeed, in plain words, stating that at the moment of death, there can be no fear as we have no consciousness to experience fear, or any other emotion.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the Nature of Privilege & Accessibility As I read Lucretius’ On the Nature of the Universe, I found myself struck by my own inability to relate to the concepts he was presenting; I consider myself someone who is constantly in awe over the power of words and the way they interact with each other in order to convey a point. Truthfully, this text left me with the exact opposite impression of enjoying what I was reading- I had very little understanding of the different scientific concepts Lucretius took great pleasure in detailing for us readers. The passage that stood out to me the most, though, had to do with a topic that is very near and dear to my heart: knowledge through education and how accessible it is. As I read Lucretius’ views…

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death is a small, seemingly innocuous five-letter word. It is a topic that many do not like to discuss until it is absolutely necessary, while others may sit and ponder it in order to make sense of their life and purpose. Many ask themselves things such as “what will happen to me after I die?” One may think that humans are scared of dying or even say that they personally are scared of death. The uncertainty of an afterlife, or the concern over what will happen to those one leaves behind are valid concerns.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Though Zhuangzi’s true thoughts on death (as on many things) are occasionally unclear and apparently contradictory (in some instances, he seems to regard death as something bad that should be avoided and a long, natural life as a positive, as is implied by the stories of Hundun and Crippled Shu [95, 61], while in most others he expresses the more accepting view of death I explore here), one view dominates throughout his work. That view is this: death is an unavoidable part of life, and we therefore should not take great pains to avoid it or worry about the fact that we will die someday (though, if that worry does happen to naturally arise, we should not actively suppress it). In the same way that where there is day there must be night, “where…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we know, the state of the soul and living a harmonious and virtuous life is far more important than the physical life. Thus, to fear death is a guilty plea to living an ignorant and unjust life. There are two outcomes to death: positive transition and positive transformation of the soul. The soul can be in eternal rest or migrate to a better place. Contrary to belief, death is not an end but the beginning of an undisturbed rest.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some though would say they would like to have their organic self alive for longer even if they are not conscious. I would disagree with the counterarguments on this particular assumptions though because the person who stays alive for an extra 25 years still have no experiences to have before they are dead so there is no reason to be alive if they cannot experience anything. Another one of Nagel’s arguments that are critiqued is that death is only bad because it deprives us of our lives. Epicures thought that since being dead does not involve pleasure or pain that it cannot be bad for us because pain is the only thing bad for us. This goes against Nagel’s argument that death is harmful to us because it deprives us of our…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I was born to a Hindu family – and therefore, I call myself a Hindu, based on the cultural exposures that I have had through my family and my religious community. And yet Hinduism for me is like a foundation, one on which I have built my own perceptions of God and religion, based on my own life experiences. My particular views may therefore seem unique at best, blasphemous at worst – but they will have a great impact on how I act as a patient, and as a physician. Like many Hindus, I believe in reincarnation. Traditionally, reincarnation means that after death, souls are reborn many times to repay their debts, to right their wrongs, and to rid themselves of their past karmas, or deeds, until they are ready to become one with God.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author of “On Natural Death” by Lewis Thomas begins his essay by being lighthearted about death and progressively gets more into depth with the aspects of death for different living things and whether or not they detect pain. This is to objectify the fact that death is destined for all living things and that it shouldn’t be planned or feared but instead, it should be accepted. The first strategy Lewis Thompson uses is denouncing books about death. Lewis emphasizes that death is becoming planned with there being “so many new books about dying” placed next to “the health diet and home repair paperbacks”. Lewis insinuates that the topic of planned death is considered ordinary to where it’s placed next to everyday topics and accepted by society who doesn’t think twice about it.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays