On Being An Atheist By H. J Mcloskey Analysis

H. J. McCloskey wrote the article “ On Being an Atheist”. This very interesting article gave his personal opinion on why he did not believe in God. In his article he gives his opinions of the cosmological, and teleological arguments. The main argument he makes in his article is about the evil and hardship in the world which is suppose to be created by a caring and loving God. Though H.j Mcloskey wanted to have proof and contrary to his opinions of the cosmological and theological arguments along with his case for the problem of evil, his article only points to the fact that the only logical explanation for the creation of the world is the existence of a great architect which is God.
Mcloskey had a habit of referring to arguments as proofs. This causes issues in which he mcclokey is very quick to disregard the arguments in favor of the existence of …show more content…
People often describe this by exsplaing that one would not see a wonderfuly made object without a designer. Most belivers side the teleogical argument . they feel there is an inttelegent architect. Mckloskey claimes that to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed.” he was clearly misinformed because the teleogical argument was based solely on possibility.
It is important to ponder whether it is possible to prove “indisputability”. Dew and forman claim it is not. there are exsamples that show that there is an intelligent desiner . finding indisputable exsample proves to be a difficult task. Yet there are some that can show that indeed the world as we know it was infacted created by an intelligent designer. one such exsample is humans . when you look at the complexity of humans it is impossible to deny that there had to be an intelligent designer. when one looks at carefully designed attributes of each individual one