They would usually think hydropower or solar energy or wind as an energy source because they use different resources. As stated above biomass has quite an amount of resources, but these resources are often confused with fossil fuels because biomass usually relies on organic matter. According to Dr. Charlotte Williams from Imperial University’s Department of Chemistry, biomass has completely different molecules compared to that of hydrocarbons from oil. Which means that there is a chance to make high values such as plastics to fuels by creating and developing new techniques of extorting energy out of the biomass’ resources, especially plants. Biomass should be used over fossil fuels because it has the one thing that all-renewable sources of energy have, sustainability, something that fossil fuels will never come to possess. Fossil fuel is a finite amount of sources of energy and they tend to run out in the nearby or distant future. Even though it is limited, people use them because of their quick and easy access to energy and about seventy-nine percent of the energy of the United States came from there. There are fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gases etc. Although they have that very quick process of energy production and their recourses also from animals and plants but it is no better than the efficiency and sustainability of biomass, despite having some disadvantages. They are very much alike and they have similar impressions. One of them is that biomass fuels and fossil fuels are not different because, when burned, both give out carbon dioxide. It’s true because if land from which biomass is collected for fuel is not replanted and instead is converted to other uses. But if it is produced sustainably, the trees and other plants will remove the carbon dioxide and during photosynthesis, they will store the carbon in themselves. And when
They would usually think hydropower or solar energy or wind as an energy source because they use different resources. As stated above biomass has quite an amount of resources, but these resources are often confused with fossil fuels because biomass usually relies on organic matter. According to Dr. Charlotte Williams from Imperial University’s Department of Chemistry, biomass has completely different molecules compared to that of hydrocarbons from oil. Which means that there is a chance to make high values such as plastics to fuels by creating and developing new techniques of extorting energy out of the biomass’ resources, especially plants. Biomass should be used over fossil fuels because it has the one thing that all-renewable sources of energy have, sustainability, something that fossil fuels will never come to possess. Fossil fuel is a finite amount of sources of energy and they tend to run out in the nearby or distant future. Even though it is limited, people use them because of their quick and easy access to energy and about seventy-nine percent of the energy of the United States came from there. There are fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gases etc. Although they have that very quick process of energy production and their recourses also from animals and plants but it is no better than the efficiency and sustainability of biomass, despite having some disadvantages. They are very much alike and they have similar impressions. One of them is that biomass fuels and fossil fuels are not different because, when burned, both give out carbon dioxide. It’s true because if land from which biomass is collected for fuel is not replanted and instead is converted to other uses. But if it is produced sustainably, the trees and other plants will remove the carbon dioxide and during photosynthesis, they will store the carbon in themselves. And when