Why would a successful football star throw his life away? OJ Simpson, who previously and still continually accused of murdering Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, was an American
Football Star Player, winning the Heisman Trophy in 1968. Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman were both murdered outside of Nicole’s condo, and many believe it was OJ, but was it really? In the controversial court case of OJ Simpson, the verdict correctly appointed him innocent and acquitted him of the murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman because his arthritis would have made it very difficult to commit murder, evidence proved him innocent, and his son had issues with knifes and continues to experience this.
OJ Simpson, known to have arthritis and many other sports injuries, …show more content…
He can turn very violent as he had been in a violent fight with his former girlfriend and has cut her hair off with knifes before. Jason had not been questioned during the trail, but he was looked at to see where he claimed he was at.. His alibi for the night had been the restaurant he had a job at but the time clock and punch out looked odd and irregular (Killer). Therefore it shows that it could have been changed and set straight. He should have been interviewed and seen as a suspect throughout the case. There is substantial reasons as to why Jason is the murder instead of OJ.
In the controversial court case of OJ Simpson, the verdict correctly appointed him innocent and acquitted him of the murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman because his arthritis would have made it very difficult to commit murder, evidence proved him innocent, and his son had issues with knifes and continues to experience this. OJ didn't do it. You should always look into all the facts and suspects before accusing someone of something. Granted he is serving a thirty three year sentence for breaking and entering and robing, but before that happened, what would have been the point if he had everything he needed and his life was
Football Star Player, winning the Heisman Trophy in 1968. Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman were both murdered outside of Nicole’s condo, and many believe it was OJ, but was it really? In the controversial court case of OJ Simpson, the verdict correctly appointed him innocent and acquitted him of the murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman because his arthritis would have made it very difficult to commit murder, evidence proved him innocent, and his son had issues with knifes and continues to experience this.
OJ Simpson, known to have arthritis and many other sports injuries, …show more content…
He can turn very violent as he had been in a violent fight with his former girlfriend and has cut her hair off with knifes before. Jason had not been questioned during the trail, but he was looked at to see where he claimed he was at.. His alibi for the night had been the restaurant he had a job at but the time clock and punch out looked odd and irregular (Killer). Therefore it shows that it could have been changed and set straight. He should have been interviewed and seen as a suspect throughout the case. There is substantial reasons as to why Jason is the murder instead of OJ.
In the controversial court case of OJ Simpson, the verdict correctly appointed him innocent and acquitted him of the murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman because his arthritis would have made it very difficult to commit murder, evidence proved him innocent, and his son had issues with knifes and continues to experience this. OJ didn't do it. You should always look into all the facts and suspects before accusing someone of something. Granted he is serving a thirty three year sentence for breaking and entering and robing, but before that happened, what would have been the point if he had everything he needed and his life was