Offshore Drill Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Since the 1800s, natural resources have been collected from oceans by using offshore drills (Offshore). While this new innovation created jobs and bolstered coastal economies, it also produced a new, looming threat to marine wildlife and coastal economies. In 1967, the first major oil spill occurred off of the coast of the Isles of Scilly, when 38 million gallons of oil were spilled into surrounding waters. Including this incident, 36 major spills have occurred since 1967, exposing marine environments to at least one trillion gallons of oil (Oil). Now, it is being debated about whether or not to drill for natural resources off of the Southeastern Coast. In my opinion, companies should not be allowed to drill off of the Southeastern Coast because the benefits gained from drilling would not outweigh the detrimental environmental and economic impact. It is difficult to find a report which explicitly states the exact amounts of natural resources located off of the Southeastern coast, but there are a few places which reference what may be available. An article by Jaime McClain posted in August of 2015 states, “All of the economically recoverable oil and gas believed to exist off of South Carolina would last for only six days based on current domestic …show more content…
First, the collection of oil from the Southeastern Coast will add to the supply of American oil, and could possibly lower local gas prices (Pros). These rigs would create jobs for locals, and attract new residents as families move closer for work. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2009, between 500 and 5,000 or more jobs have been brought to coastal communities which have oil rigs offshore (Fact). This would also help stimulate coastal economies. While it costs around $550,000 a day to run an oil rig, this cost would be covered by the company doing the drilling, and not the people in the communities affected

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Should oil drilling be allowed off the coast of North Carolina? This question has sparked mass controversy not only in North Carolina but around the world. With population growth at an all-time high and demand for natural resources increasing rapidly, the race to energy security for our nation has escalated. In 2015, the Obama administration, declared the consideration of allowing offshore oil drilling off the coasts of Georgia, Virginia, South Carolina, and North Carolina. The U.S Department of the Interior drafted a 5-year plan making oil and gas leasing available on the southeast coast.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I support the building of the Keystone XL pipeline because it will help out America in the future. Right now the future of the build is uncertain while it cannot get passed through the government. The Keystone XL pipeline can be beneficial for the U.S economically and environmentally. in multiple ways. The building of the Keystone XL pipeline will tremendously help the U.S in more than one way.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    BP Oil Spill Vs Dust Bowl

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The BP or Deepwater Horizon oil spill occurred on April 20, 2010 and came about due to natural gas blasting through a concrete core that was too weak to overcome the pressure of the gas. The natural gas then traveled to the rig’s riser to the platform of the rig where it was ignited. After killing 11 workers, the rig sank and oil began to travel into the gulf after the drilling mud no longer counteracted the pressure of the oil. Even though it has been five years since the BP Oil spill, there is still oil in the surrounding ecosystem even though it is not visible on the surface. A significant amount of oil is on the Gulf’s floor and the oil that traveled into wetlands and beaches is still present and will be present for many more years.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The truth is that until there is more data available to provide concrete proof of the dangers fracking presents, the drilling will continue. It is such a new issue that without extensive research,…

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While fracking could be a great opportunity, it first needs to be determined if the benefits are greater than the…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the environmental cost of drilling? Do we dare touch such a fragile ecosystem that could never resurrect itself just because “gas prices are too high?” Is mankind so greedy and superficial that we have to take away one the most vast and unique areas of the world just for our own benefit? These are some of the many argumentative questions rational, environmentally aware individuals are asking after a significant amount oil has been recorded under the layers of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marsh Resilience

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The results showed that there is a significant amount of resilience by the salt marshes of the Gulf of Mexico to large amounts of oil, however, at high saturation levels, the land loss due to erosion is considerable and irreversible. I find this result frightening because as oil demand continues to increase the chances of disasters occurring in its collection or transport are expected. The effect that the Deepwater Horizon disaster had on the Gulf of Mexico ecosystems can be compared to the potential effect the Dakota Access Pipeline and the Keystone Pipeline could have on terrestrial ecosystems should a disaster occur. Convincing research results could not only help rehabilitate negatively affected ecosystems, but it could potentially prevent the development and usage of technology that could have a large, irreversible effect on the world's…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) sits on what we might call a pot of black gold; a reported 7 billion barrels of oil can be found here (Primack), and we can find a lot of debates online regarding the ANWR. On one side the oil industry’s potential role in accessing the land, pulling this resource out for the benefit of the energy independence and economic growth of North America. On the other side of the debate is the protection of this majestic beauty of the vast grasslands and herds that live in this refuge and the ugliness and loss of biodiversity that will occur if or when drilling activities are allowed. The question that I think we need to address in forming our opinion on this topic is how we weigh the value of the competing…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More oil drilled by the USA would mean more energy independent. Many jobs would be created and the revenue for the state would be in the billions. In spite of this, the world is realizing that fossil fuels are impacting the environment creating the need for renewable resources. If the money that was used for offshore drilling was put towards green energy the USA would be able to reduce dependence on foreign oil even more so than using the new domestic oil. In addition to, renewable energy being cleaner for the world.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. should not drill for oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge because it would endanger animals, they wouldn’t make a lot of money, and pollution would damage the environment. A recent U.S. department of energy (DOE) assessment says there is ‘’ Considerable Uncertainty regarding both the size and quality of the oil resources that exist in ANWR.’’ Even if it is 7-7 barrels a day that will be able to recover the current upper limits of ANWR oil production is the transportation of TAPS( Trans Alaska Pipeline System), or about 2.136 million barrels a day. About everyday the United States burns at least 21 million barrels.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the ANWR has large reserves of oil it is a protected wildlife refuge and this is why drilling here becomes a debate. Other people should be informed on issues such as this that concern the environment and the animals involved in its ecosystem. One point which is often discussed are the pros versus the cons of drilling in the refuge. Potentially, very large amounts of oil are in the refuge, but the environmental impacts could be more serious than a person may think. Based on recent article examination and research this report assesses the problems associated with drilling in the ANWR, the views and reasoning behind both sides of the debate, and information to educate someone before they decide where they stand on the issue.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Offshore drilling, this is something that helps and hinders many people, companies, and countries. The process of offshore drilling takes lots of energy, time, and money. It is a process where a rig or boat drills a hole through the ground till the rig hits oil or the desired product that’s being drilled. There is domestic and foreign drilling that produces oil for our companies, domestic drilling saves America millions of dollars. (Offshore Drilling)Sometimes America can’t provide the major companies with enough oil, that’s why the companies resort to buying foreign oil.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, a new debate has come up recently. The U.S. offshore drilling debate is an ongoing controversy in the United States on whether or not offshore drilling should be allowed for new wells off the coast of the U.S. This debate is important because it is an important decision that needs to be made carefully. Sacrificing our ocean life and losing a large amount of sea life to another oil spill, may not be worth it.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brent Spar Case

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brent Spar was first installed in Brent Field in June 1976 (Kirby 1998). This oil platform is designed as a huge floating production stage facility and owned by Shell and Esso for business purposes which including oil storage and tanker loading. After serving for 15 years, Shell decided to abandon the platform by dumping it into deep water sea with the approval of the UK Government (Kirby 1998). In 1995, Shell announced the granted dispose plan to the world. However, this has been strongly objected by the Greenpeace, other NGOs, European Ministers and the public. Many protests, campaigns against ocean dumping, and objection voices form the stakeholders have contributed to the reverser of Shell UK disposing decision (Greenpeace 2015).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Offshore oil drilling offers New Zealand the chance to create employment opportunities, and lose their reliance and dependency of importing oil from other countries.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays