If Hyde is Jekyll's evil side then Jekyll should be completely good after the seperation. Yet, he does not get a different body or perhaps a slightly altered body as he said that his uncontrolled evil side is one-tenths of his life.3 Jill L. Matus argues that Jekyll does not get “rid...of the Hyde-like parts within....Hyde is part that becomes a person, but Jekyll is still left a man of many parts.”4 Moreover, as they do share the same memory one can argue that Jekyll is responsible for Hyde's actions. He might not be able to control Hyde but he can make the decision to prevent evil events from happening. The one time he tries, his weakness fails him and resulted in the death of Sir Carew. The reader does not know exactly what Hyde is involved in except for the vague incident of him 'trampling' a child (which is seen by some critics as a euphemism for child prostitution5) and the murder of Carew. Except for the latter, Jekyll does not seem to show remorse. In fact, he mentions that at first he did not feel
If Hyde is Jekyll's evil side then Jekyll should be completely good after the seperation. Yet, he does not get a different body or perhaps a slightly altered body as he said that his uncontrolled evil side is one-tenths of his life.3 Jill L. Matus argues that Jekyll does not get “rid...of the Hyde-like parts within....Hyde is part that becomes a person, but Jekyll is still left a man of many parts.”4 Moreover, as they do share the same memory one can argue that Jekyll is responsible for Hyde's actions. He might not be able to control Hyde but he can make the decision to prevent evil events from happening. The one time he tries, his weakness fails him and resulted in the death of Sir Carew. The reader does not know exactly what Hyde is involved in except for the vague incident of him 'trampling' a child (which is seen by some critics as a euphemism for child prostitution5) and the murder of Carew. Except for the latter, Jekyll does not seem to show remorse. In fact, he mentions that at first he did not feel