375). In other words, some cases of a certain OCD subtype relate to a different subtype that is equally, and in some cases more relevant, to another disorder. If these situations begin to arise quite frequently it could potentially bring people to question the diagnostic integrity of obsessive-compulsive problems. This dilemma is making researchers question whether or not subtyping would be a beneficial tool to use. “A fruitful, robust subtype system should be able to account for all pertinent data, including clinical features, family history, laboratory findings, and patterns of treatment response” (p. 373). Sometimes only two or three of those domains are looked at by subtyping researchers because there are many different ways in which a category of a subtype can be defined, making it difficult to guarantee a completely valid
375). In other words, some cases of a certain OCD subtype relate to a different subtype that is equally, and in some cases more relevant, to another disorder. If these situations begin to arise quite frequently it could potentially bring people to question the diagnostic integrity of obsessive-compulsive problems. This dilemma is making researchers question whether or not subtyping would be a beneficial tool to use. “A fruitful, robust subtype system should be able to account for all pertinent data, including clinical features, family history, laboratory findings, and patterns of treatment response” (p. 373). Sometimes only two or three of those domains are looked at by subtyping researchers because there are many different ways in which a category of a subtype can be defined, making it difficult to guarantee a completely valid