Objectification And Synthesis Essay: The Jeffersonian Democracy

Improved Essays
The Jeffersonian Democracy as described by historians was a new way to potentially unite America’s political ambitions by petitioning highly political biased newspapers for support with the intended result of separating it from the Federalists (Schultz, n.d.). This type of campaigning at the grassroots level, exploiting barbeques and clambakes for political gain, was tactics not used or even thought of by the Federalists which made them appear to be out of touch. At times, the campaign would turn into malicious confrontations with assertive politics, in which the Federalists had not become proficient at this type of lobbying.
Jefferson had three domestic principles centering on the reduction of government, the creation of a court system nationwide,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    He, like Hamilton, understood that the rebellion in France would soon spread throughout Europe and abroad. Unlike Hamilton, however, Jefferson believed that the spread of radical French ideologies was tantamount to preserving the American constitution, “I consider the establishment and success of their government as necessary to stay up our own and to prevent it from falling back to that kind of Halfway-house, the English constitution” (108). Comparatively speaking though, Jefferson’s idealistic stance on American and French relations proved more dangerous to the U.S. than Hamilton’s. His initial views were, in retrospect, Machiavellian in that he believed that the ends would ultimately justify the means, “The liberty of the whole earth was depending on the issue of the contest, and was ever such a prize won with so little innocent blood?” (109).…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the American Revolution, it was controversial how it should be run .Of these one of these debates was about which government the United States should adopt. Two types of people were involved in this controversy; there were Anti-Federalists and Federalists. The Federalists would rather have a stronger central government while the Anti-Federalists preferred more power to go to the individual states. In order to reach a compromise of this national debate, Roger Sherman, an extremely influential and out-spoken figure in the country’s freedom, held a dinner party.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the time John Adam’s presidency came to an end in 1800, two political parties surfaced with contradicting interpretations of the United States Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans had a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Federalists had a loose interpretation. However, there beliefs were not always completely enforced by either party. In the election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican came to office. Although Democratic-Republicans presented themselves as “the guardians of agrarian purity, liberty, and states rights,” the occasionally shifted their beliefs if they thought it would benefit the United States.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adams Vs Jefferson is the gripping account of a turning point in American history, a dramatic struggle between two parties with profoundly different visions of how the nation should be governed. The federalists, led by Adams, were conservatives who favored strong government. The Republicans led by Jefferson, were more egalitarian and believed that the federalists had betrayed the Revolution of 1776 and were backsliding toward monarchy. Jefferson and Adams continued to serve the country they helped create for many years. Adam was later the first United States minister to the Court of St James in England and Jefferson served as governor of Virginia and then a US minister to France.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson Dbq

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Answer: When Thomas Jefferson stepped into office he decreased the federal government’s power. He and his followers were called Jeffersonian Republican’s because of the way they thought the government should be run. Congress appealed the Judiciary Act of 1801, which would permanently placed Federalist in positions of 16 circuit courts. One of the Federalists who were chosen for one of these positions was William Marbury from Virginia. Marbury had not received his letter for this due to the fact that Jefferson had instructed James Madison, who was the secretary of the state, to not send his letter.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the 1820s and 1830s, Jacksonian Democrats claimed to be the defenders of the Constitution and the common people, the upholders of political democracy, individual liberty, and economic equal opportunity. These claims are not truthful, as evidenced by the mishandling of Native American removal, President Jackson’s combativeness with Congress, ignorance of the Constitution, and his neglect of the liberties of women and African Americans. These decisions of Jacksonian Democrats, throughout the 1820s and 1830s, do not reflect any of the claimed. Jacksonian Democrats were supporters of Andrew Jackson’s political views. The party placed an emphasis on obtaining greater political representation and advantage for what was expressed as the common man.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is quite clear as we analyze Andrew Jackson’s presidency that he had the ambition to establish greater democracy for the common man of the United States. This political movement was dubbed, “Jacksonian Democracy”. Jackson had gone through with the movement by expanding suffrage amongst common men, establishing the spoils system, and “killing” the National Bank. He was admired by the common man, as he rose from rags to riches, was a patriot, and gained renown and fame from the War of 1812, much like Washington from the American Revolution.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Americans’ rights and liberties are overtly expressed through the Bill of Rights. Federalists and Republicans possessed contradicting views of the same document, fueling debate. Key Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton intelligently reformed the American economy, eliminating the national debt. The Federalist Papers strategically expressed the movement’s motivations and ideals, thus bolstering support. More than 200 years later, the Federalist-Antifederalist debate comprised of the same key issues that face our nation…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack N. Rakove Summary

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jack N. Rakove, James Madison and the Creation of the American Republic (Pearson, 1990). Reviewed by Hampton N. Roy, September 5, 2017. Jack N. Rakove is currently the W.R. Coe Professor of History and American Studies, as well as a professor of political science at Stanford University. He is the author of six books and has won numerous awards, most notable the 1997 Pulitzer Prize for History for his work questioning the validity of originalism, Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (Knopf, 1996). However, this review is of one of his lesser known works, James Madison and the Creation of the American Republic (Pearson, 1990), which begins with the birth of Madison in 1751 on his father’s plantation near Port…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jefferson’s Rule is that you do not have to agree with governmental ideas. It is perfectly acceptable to have conflicting viewpoints and you should have the freedom to voice your opinion and fight for what you believe. Thomas Jefferson was the voice for conflict in the United States. Jefferson desired federal state power, to keep the Articles of Confederation with a few amendments so that way, the government was not completely weakened and the citizens still had a few laws to live by.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neither Tocqueville nor the authors of the Federalist Papers view an enlightened and virtuous citizenry as wholly essential to the Constitutional system, but while the federalists build institutions to defend the government against the self-interested passions of the people, Tocqueville sees the greatest benefits of the American political system where the government and the people meet: in the township and in political associations. The Federalists believe that the core of the Constitution system’s success lies in its institutions rather than the people. Their writings repeatedly show doubt in the abilities of the public to govern, construct institutions to defend against their involvement, limiting their civic duties to elections. Tocqueville,…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. To what extent was this characterization of the two parties accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison? As war wages on in Europe, economic and political influence is spreading to America. As the President’s, Jefferson and Madison are challenged by upholding their country’s honor and putting their beliefs into action.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffersonian Democracy summed up would state something along the lines that Jefferson was a man of the people. Jefferson preferred to be in front of the people unlike Washington and the federalist that preferred to work behind locked door away from the public. Jefferson was more grassroots based and masters of the face to face with the public, this was one of the flaws of the federalist. By being the public eye and apart of the community the people trusted in what they could see instead of publications from a faceless few. Jefferson would gain the public's trust by throwing political barbecues and clambakes focused on white male landowners over 21 years of age (Kevin M. Schultz by G. Larry Mays and L. Thomas Winfree, Jr n.d. pp.153).…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was an anti-federalist and in order to reduce the influence of the central government, Jefferson decreased the amount of government employees, lowered Army enlistments, and cut the national debt. During his presidency, Jefferson was faced with foreign affairs every day. It often pushed him towards Federalists policies that negates his personal political philosophy. Jefferson’s is very well spoken and that is one of the reasons he was able to purchase the Louisiana Purchase for $15 million. Jefferson’s ideal agrarian democracy ignores the fact that slaves are the ones to work on the richest farmlands in the Unites States.…

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln,” Sean Wilentz successfully argues that the election of 1828 represented a democratic revolt of the people as the election was crucial to the development and maintenance of the second-party system. Not only is Wilentz the George Henry Davis Professor of History at Princeton University, but Wilentz is also a successful author who has won many awards including the prestigious Frederick Jackson Turner Award, the Albert J. Beveridge Award, the Pulitzer Prize, and the Bancroft Prize. In his analysis, Wilentz claims that the election of 1828 marked an evolution in the American political system as Andrew Jackson became a symbol of political power as he appealed to the common man. In fact, Wilentz successfully argues that Jackson’s election and presidency lead to the development and mobilization of political organizations which significantly shaped future presidential elections. Therefore, in “The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln,” Wilentz successfully proves that the election of 1828 represented a democratic revolt of the people as the election…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays