Obedience To Authority In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
From watching 12 Angry Men, it raises the question of what are the factors that influence the choices we make and the actions we take? 12 Angry Men was about a trial of an 18 year old boy who was accused murdering his father. He was accused of stabbing his father in the chest with a pocket knife. The judge commanded that the jury needs to come up with a decision as to whether or not the verdict (the boy) was guilty or not. If the jury pleaded guilty, the boy would face the death penalty. At first everyone but one person pleaded guilty. As the movie progressed, more and more of the jury were convinced that the boy was not guilty and eventually the jury decided that the boy was not guilty. To come up with this conclusion, the jury was not able to come up with …show more content…
Obedience to authority is defined as a social influence in which an individual follows explicit instructions and orders from an authoritative figure. For example, in the beginning scene, the judge commanded that the jury must bring a non guilty verdict or else the verdict would face the death penalty. This is an example of obedience to authority because the jury has to listen the judge due to the fact that they have the most authority in the court during the trial. The jury has to obey the judge's wishes by coming up with a conclusion as to whether or not the suspect is guilty or not guilty. Another example from the movie is when the jury did their first vote of how many people thought the boy was guilty and how many thought that the boy was not guilty of his killing his father. Most people in the jury voted the suspect as guilty, so anyone who does not know will vote guilty to prevent controversy between the people who think the boy is guilty. Lastly, another example is when the 12 men (jury) would yell at each other. The person who yelled at everyone, would get everyone’s attention and stop everyone else from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Variations of his experiment have been conducted over many years and in other settings with similar findings. The effect of authority on obedience is striking. People obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative, even when acting against their own better judgment and desires. The vast majority of people will obey authority even when it overrides their own moral judgement. Their feelings of duty and personal emotion are separated, and responsibility shifts in the mind of the subordinate to that of the authority figure.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s a daunting place the courtroom, to think this is the same place that criminals get prosecuted, charged for committing murder, domestic violence, there all prosecuted here, so what does that make me? Am I nothing but a murderer or rapist. I walk into the courtroom, it’s airy, a layer of silence blankets the room, I walk pass Jase's mother, she stares me down, guilt rushes over my body. I know all too well what she thinks of me, and what Jase's situation would be like if I were just to come forward as that third man. I look over to the Lamb, he gives me a reassuring nod, he’s ready to take a bullet for me, go down with a prosecution that could set him back years, and leave a big black mark on his file, the jobs that he could miss out on his future in pieces.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Few Good Men was written by Aaron Sorkin and it is about a lawyer trying to defend two marines accused of murder. The two marines claimed to have received an order to discipline another marine and killed him in the process. The lawyer, Lt. Daniel Kaffee, then has to gather evidence for this claim and eventually get Colonel Jessep to state he gave the marines the order. The story encompasses many factors of obedience to authority and peer pressure and shows what can happen when orders are followed blindly. Many experiments and studies have taken place to explain why people follow orders even if it might violate their morals and result in someone getting hurt.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obedience To Authority Obedience basically means compliance with an order, request, or law or submission to another's authority. Following the orders of authority blindly can have many negative effects. My Lai Massacre, Jonestown Massacre, Millgram Experiment and Nanking Massacre are some incidents that have caused negative consequences as a result of obedience to authority. My Lai Massacre took place in 1968.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Honor or Murder How far would someone would go to make another person happy? Even if it meant hurting them mentally and physically? Obeying authority can only go so far before it becomes a very unhealthy action. Sadly that is exactly what Lance Cpl. Dawson and Pfc.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These twelve men of the jury will have to discuss and go over evidence to decide the boy 's fate. When the men sit down in the room it is very obvious that, most of the men do not want to be here. Also majority of the men think the boy is guilty, even without discussing the case. So they all take a vote on what the boys fate will be. Eleven of the jurors say death, but juror number eight votes not guilty.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3). This simple ethics, values that most reasonable people can agree on and be governed through. Because we agree that justice is a basic value this it is imperative that the boy be considered innocent until proven guilty. To render judgment prematurely would be unethical yet as we see in 12 Angry Men, eleven of the twelve jury members are convinced the boy is guilty during the first vote, only eight stands against them.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their choice would either send an 18-year-old Hispanic man to death or set him free. When the twelve men were locked in the deliberation room, the jury foreman acted as the facilitator for the group. It was the jury foreman that got everyone focused for the initial vote. It was important get everyone focused because the group was busy discussing their personal life, occupations, and their future plans. They were not discussing the case because they assumed everyone would vote the same.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the movie, A Few Good Men, there is controversy about obedience to authority when two marines follow an order believed to be unethical. Privates Dawson and Downey, carry out a “code red”, or hazing, of another member of the unit, and were put on trial for the unintentional murder of Private Santiago. Stanley Milgram, Yale psychologist and author of “The Perils of Obedience” claims, “Some system of authority is a requirement of all communal living” (Milgram 78). Along with Milgram, Philip Zimbardo, and Erich Fromm also converse on the psychological issues regarding human behavior. Milgram’s test subjects were tricked into thinking they were electrically shocking someone if they answered a question wrong.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Okay. Eleven to one, guilty.” (Rose 4). At first glance, all the jurors excluding Juror #8, view the boy as guilty. They claim that this is due to the evidence they were presented with, but it is also related to their bias and the fact that they want to go home as early as possible.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The combining effect of these two incidents, gives off the illusion is that the group is all unanimous in the guilty vote. This symptom of group for group think also facilitate the reason behind the normative influence and informative influence that occurred during the voting, by claiming the group is in unanimous agreement, the jurors now think that if everyone agree then I should agree too because they either know something I don’t or I don’t want to be the only odd one out. By definition, conformity happens when we are placed in ambiguous or confusing situations, crisis situations or when other people are experts. During the first voting all but one of the 12 jurors voted not guilty.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie. Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays