John Mccain Feingold Act Case Study

Improved Essays
John McCain the senior senator from Arizona was one of the leading proponents supporting campaign finance reform. However, not everyone else in Washington agreed with him. He began to see how murky the waters of politics were becoming with the influence of money in the process of elections. McCain got together with Ross Feingold and drafted the McCain-Feingold Act to try to curb the corruption that was beginning to turn Washington into a free for all. Prior to this act politics and the influx of mass amounts of money supporting candidates for office had become widespread, and yet nobody wanted to tackle this gross issue. McCain-Feingold set to prohibit corporations from spending money on broadcast electioneering communication during the time …show more content…
This case did not deal with speech; however it dealt with the question to whether or not a non-profit corporation had the right to show a documentary, this would place the case under the issue of freedom of the press. However the court did not use the Freedom of the Press Clause instead it applied the First Amendment right of free speech to Citizens United a non-profit organization. The majority found that corporations have a voice and have a vested interest in informing the electorate. The majority found that the government’s regulation or censorship to control thought “to command where a person may get his or her information or what distrusted source he or she may not hear” Concluding that the “First Amendment confirms the freedom to think for ourselves.” The majority found the restriction of though unlawful and applied this to corporations. With a broad interpretation of who citizens were, the majority finds that limiting the speech of corporations is suppressing a important outlet of communication. By allowing that "Factions should be checked by permitting them all to speak, and by entrusting the people to judge what is true and what is false.” To regulate or censor speech the majority found that the government would deprive the people of “information, knowledge and opinion vital to its function" and would by the suppression of speech prevent the electorate to be educated “on which persons or entities are …show more content…
Austin banned independent expenditures by corporations for the purpose of political speech. Citizens reexamined those previously discussed precedent cases. The majority in Citizens found that Austin went too far in censoring free speech of an association of citizen’s right to engage in political speech. The majority felt Austin went too far in banning speech even though it was by a corporation. These associations of citizens, that were referred to as corporations, Justice Kennedy felt were “the most significant segments of the economy." Citizens overruled Austin and felt it was not judged on reason. The majority failed to make clear the difference between "corporate speech about the general issues on the one hand and corporate speech specifically advocating the election or defeat of a candidate on the other" this clear distinction was what brought about Congress 's laws and the previous statues which address corporate speech as having two different aspects. Stevens and the 3 other justices who dissented found that corporations interest conflicted with the interest of eligible voters, and therefore could not be able bodies citizens who deserved free speech if these corporations could be run by foreign interests. Justice Stevens believed that "Corporate speech is a derivative speech, speech by proxy." and that the “Unregulated corporate

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Stolen Valor Case Study

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this Supreme Court Abel Fields is found not guilty. In 2011, 39 year old Fields was convicted in California for falsely speaking of serving in the military for eight years and receiving a Purple Heart. He was in violation of the Stolen Valor act. The Stolen Valor act protects the veterans who receive a Purple Heart after being wounded in war. In his previous ruling he was found guilty.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court case was eventually partially overruled by the Supreme Court in Brandenburg v. Ohio but officially secured that free speech could be drastically limited. Oyez states, the “The Court used a two-pronged test to evaluate speech acts: (1) speech can be prohibited if it is ‘directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action’ and (2) it is ‘likely to incite or produce such action’” (Oyez). Thus, the limitations of free speech in Brandenburg v. Ohio were solidified and displays how the effects of Schenck v. United States inadvertently affected many prominent court cases Overall, Schenck v. United States illustrates how one case limited the scope of the 1st amendment's free speech. Along the way, the court case paved the way for other court cases to be settled upon Schenck v. United States results, all of which solidified the deprivation of rights.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Oz Hewett The Political Product The Constitution is document laying out the frame of America’s government, written by the creators of this country on a piece of parchment. This document has done a good job of making sure the rights of the people are protected, and that the United States maintains order. After the writing of the Constitution, there were ten amendments made to it, commonly know as the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case worked its way up to the Supreme Court. In a five to four vote, the majority decided that the ban was in fact a violation of the second amendment rights. Justice Scalia's argument…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Unfair Engel v. Vitale Court Case Many court cases are viewed unfair by the public, and seem to violate the U.S. Constitution’s first amendment. A particular trial aroused my attention as well. I disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision in the Engel v. Vitale trial that declared it unconstitutional to openly lead prayer in public schools.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Field Case Analysis

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case a man named Abel Fields falsely said that he worked in the military for eight years. He also claimed that he had earned a purple heart which you only earn if are wounded in battle. This man never served in the military so everything he said was false. He was making these claims in a public safety meeting, he told the public that they should listen to him because of his experience.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    his is the Supreme Court opinion in the case which involves the case of United States v. Fields. A man named, Abel Fields. who is a resident of California, is being tried for the Stolen Valor Act. In 2011. Abel Fields spoke publicly at a meeting he attend.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ratifying the Constitution The Articles of Confederation which established a governmental structure to unify all the states that fought in the American Revolution. The Articles of Confederations purpose was to create a confederation of states which soon failed. The reason the articles failed was because the Congress and the national government had not been given enough power to work efficiently. The Constitution was going to take over the place of the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The company understood the legal practices and procedures leading to a ruling of a First Amendment violation (Epstein, 2011). By releasing their film through a private industry, Citizens United established their freedom to withhold donor information from government bodies so long as they were following established laws (Epstein, 2011). The only exceptions to the First Amendment are criminal provisions, none of which were performed by Citizens United (Epstein, 2011). Epstein makes the argument that for governing bodies, it becomes more difficult to justify additional unprecedented restrictions in the presence of a multitude of additional restrictions (Epstein, 2011). With so many restrictive laws in place against corporations, it would be unconstitutional to infringe upon the company’s right to express their support of an independent body such as a super PAC (Epstein, 2011).…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution: Fixed or Flexible 1.The Death Penalty: Is It Constitutional? How should judges interpret vaguely worded phrases in the Constitution? The act of interpreting vaguely worded phrases in the Constitution should be frequently revised over time, according to Thomas Jefferson, in order to meet the demands of the nation, and to satisfy the public opinion at that certain time.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court cases have played a requisite role in modifying and defining certain amendments in the constitution. The decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans has displayed a monumental impact on American society, both at the time of the decision and in the latter future. Though the first amendment prohibits the restriction of speech and press, in this particular case the government was entitled to restrict those rights. The court argued that Texas specialty license plate designs constitute government speech, and thus Texas was entitled to refuse to issue plates featuring SCV’s proposed design. The court 's decision has stimulated great reaction in our nation causing dispute over whether the government passes off private speech as government speech.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let’s Stand Up For Liberty Citizens rights and liberty of America has been a very hot topic throughout all these years. There are many citizens who feels as if their rights are being abused and there are also some who would disagree. The ones who feel as if their rights are being abused are the ones who are under the government. They have limits to everything that they do in their life such as wars, racism, and speech and many more. The ones who would debate against this are the ones who are working within the government.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays