Nuclear Weapons In Cold War

Improved Essays
The world needs nuclear weapons; they are a powerful tool in negotiation and war prevention, however they need to be treated with respect and managed properly. Nuclear weapons are very powerful and necessary tools for world peace. However ironic that statement sounds, it is a fact that is too important not to consider. During the cold war, a theory called mutually assured destruction, known by the acronym MAD (Opposing Viewpoints), came about. The philosophy stated that any countries attacked with a nuclear bomb would retaliate to the launch of a nuclear device of their own,causing the destruction of both parties. In the case of the Cuban-Missile crisis, both parties had to consider the destructive nature of the weapons and the after-effects of using them and ultimately chose to compromise. Without the ever-present threat of nuclear weapons, the United States and Russia surely would have had more conflicts throughout the cold war. In order to cut the amount of destruction caused by nuclear weapons, the United States, Russia …show more content…
In the past two decades, we’ve seen India and Pakistan take their rivalries to a new level with the introduction of smaller, precision devices called tactical nukes (Asia Society). From their initial test dates, the US and the Soviets the world’s biggest rivals(Atomic Archive). Today, Russia is attempting to continue production and research of nukes while our weapons program languishes. Even countries such as North Korea signed documents promising that they won’t produce nuclear material or weapons,(Arms Control Association) but that hasn’t stopped them in the slightest. With the recent developments of Iran’s nuclear program, what will happen? Will they dismantle their equipment or continue researching weapons of mass destruction. But the real question is, where in the future, will the United States

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is what I always hope. We already see the power of the atomic bomb, thus, I think having a nuclear weapons can keep us from going to war. Because not every country can make a nucleus weapons. It can protect us.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There is no absolutely safe defense against a nuclear bomb, so as shown through history, nuclear weapons are their own deterrents. To stop wars, nuclear weapons, such as atomic bombs, were used, but in order for the enemy to combat those weapons, they had to develop nuclear armaments themselves, which creates a cycle where the production of weapons instigates the production of more weapons16. This led to the situation in the 2000s when there were, “[…] 32,000 nuclear bombs possessed by eight nations containing 5,000 megatons of destructive energy. This is a global arsenal more than sufficient to destroy the world”17. It was only after the cold war, when the Soviet Union and the United States of America were competing to develop more and more deadly weapons in larger quantities, did countries realize that there was no need for all of the weapons they had created, and thus agreed to limit themselves to only enough weapons to eliminate the enemy.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative Statement The current interventionist foreign policy that has driven the U.S. to accept an overwhelming amount of responsibility for maintaining the global order -- a commitment of such great magnitude that it should not be the burden of a single state, even a superpower such as the U.S. that “dominate[s] the world militarily, economically, and politically” (Posen 117). Emboldened by assumptions of American geopolitical strengths, the U.S. has pursued nation-building operations that serve as a detriment to both the federal budget and their international reputation. Instead, a return to the pre-WWII foreign policy of offshore balancing would reallocate resources from futile nation-building exercises towards preserving American dominance…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, there exists this culture of fear that plagues all levels of society. This infection is believed by the masses to only be cured by the notion of security. Security, however, only prompts more fear. In effort to protect our ways of life, people justify various decisions and by these justifications, the commercialization of security is deemed acceptable and has become normalized. Professor Park posits that the Control need is the source of all evil.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When World War II struck the nation, the United States became known as a super power but not right from the start. America started out being neutral and helping out with the war from only they were selective in who they helped, so America was not being very neutral. America denied aid to Japan and Germany, the United States had even put out an order to shoot German U-Boats on sight. World War II broke out in 1939 and ended by 1945 the United States entered by declaring war on Japan in 1941 after the fatal Pearl Harbor attack on December 7, three days after the United States declared war on the Japanese, Germany and Italy declared war on America putting the United States in a full fledged two front war. A main reason the war ended when it did…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason why nuclear bombs haven’t been used since World War II is because it’s expensive making nuclear bombs. The United States have weapons with unbelievable destructive power. Nuclear bombs are so deadly that it has the ability to destroy places and kill people that are far away in only minutes. Nuclear weapons are deadly weapons.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nuclear bombs became a power equalizer between the two nations. The game had changed now that there were two nuclear weapon states and fear of retaliation became a reason for deterrence. There was no possibility of trial and error with deterrence at the…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cuban Missile Crisis

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a dangerous confrontation between the US and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. This is when the US and Soviet Union came the closest to nuclear warfare. The situation was different in a number of ways, featuring confirmations and non supported directions as well as direct communications and miscommunications between both the US and Soviet Union (Office). The overwhelming conflict was also being judged by the fact that it was basically played out at the White House and the Kremlin level with very little say from the respective organizations typically involved in the foreign policy stages (Office).…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the U.S. dropped nuclear bombs on Japan the Soviet Union felt that they need to create their own nuclear weapon to ensure that the U.S. would not use one on them. Then in 1949 the Soviet Union set off their first nuclear weapon. The Soviet Union’s nuclear bomb test scared America because now the U.S. was not the only one with a nuclear weapon and now it felt threatened. As a result of the Soviet’s test the U.S. started to produce more nuclear weapons under the idea of deterrence. “The stockpile of both the United States and the Soviet Union increased in a nuclear arms race as each sought to develop a deterrent to the other, involving a second-strike capability” (Carlisle).…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear arms would play a vital role in the following Cold War. They were a cause of the cold war. They were a tool to threaten rival nations. And finally, they served as the deterrent that prevented the Cold War from becoming World War 3. Nuclear arms served as a cause of the Cold War.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    in the wake of World War II, in a move closely related to the beginnings of the Cold War, the United States of America decided to resume nuclear testing in the Pacific Ocean, on Bikini Atoll in the Marshall archipelago. After the displacement of the local inhabitants, 67 nuclear tests were carried out from 1946 to 1958, including the explosion of the first H-bomb (1952). Bikini Atoll has conserved direct tangible evidence that is highly significant in conveying the power of the nuclear tests, the sunken ships sent to the bottom of the lagoon by the tests in 1946 and the gigantic Bravo crater. Equivalent to 7,000 times the force of the Hiroshima bomb, the tests had major consequences on the geology and natural environment of Bikini Atoll and…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginning of the Cold War in 1947, tensions had been gradually increasing between the Soviet Union and the United States. However, in 1962 tensions reached an all-time high when the United States found evidence of Soviet missiles in Cuba. In this tense period, the entire world held its breath fearing global disaster. The Cold War at times threatened to become a direct confrontation between the superpowers. Looking back, a victory in terms of the Cuban Missile Crisis alludes to achieving foreign policy goals, and although both succeeded in the short term, Khrushchev was the ultimate victor in the long run.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And even if we never go to war with our weapons, Worldwide transgressions and arguments are solved easier because they know of our power. On the other hand people who believe our nuclear weapons should be dismantled state their view that nuclear weapons only cause problems. They make other nations not like us because nuclear weapons are very hostile and have nothing friendly about them and hurt the morals of our nation and others ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 8 ). North Korea feels the need to make more nuclear weapons because of ours. The United States should retain their nuclear arsenal because they help keep our nation safe, If we go to war we can use them to scare off other nations or worst case scenario, use the weapons, and nuclear weapons are more cost efficient than some…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even with discontinuance of the cold war, military continues to develop; this has lapsed the spending especially in the deployment of nuclear-armed and ballistic missiles along with defensive systems. Due to the fact that there was no formalized treaty ending the Cold War, the former influential nations have continued to desperate lengths. This caused them to depend on their economies to maintain and push to improve, even modify existing nuclear weapons. Many states had taken into consideration the potential risk to national and international security, which pushed them to acknowledge nuclear-weapons states had inherited major responsibilities in protecting sustaining the balance of their nuclear forces. To elaborate on risks, there are accidental and unauthorized nuclear havoc which not only puts the military in danger it puts civilians into that category as well.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays