The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

Superior Essays
Nuclear weapons were introduced into the world in 1945 ending the WW2. The main purpose of them was guised to “protect” the people of the world when it was truly created for another reason. We know what nuclear weapons can do, it has both short term effects and long term effects and also highly destructive, yet we still construct more of them. In total, there are about 23 000 nuclear weapons in the world (Walker, Countdown to Zero). Clearly, that is way too much weapons that cause mass destructions and all these weapons that cause destruction at a large scale is not protection. The Catholic Church were always against the idea of a weapon of mass destruction from the beginning these nuclear weapons were made. According to the church, that much …show more content…
World leaders should be able to secure their citizens from both internal and external threats. Nuclear weapons is an example of security from external threats, even though it causes so much destruction, also, it is a factor on why nuclear weapons still exist. Stockpiling nuclear weapons will give a higher leverage over enemies and prevent them from unwanted attacks, however, these are weapons that can literally blow up the Earth multiple times. Something that can cause massive destruction will not keep anyone safe, it will cause more problems and increase tensions with rivals. Robert Oppenheimer, who is known as the father of nuclear bombs because he created the first nuclear bomb, regrets creating it due to the power it possesses and the damage it can do and the that the world we live in is not safe with these nuclear weapons (Walker, Countdown to Zero). Using nuclear weapons to secure your own innocent lives and not think about others is what I call an act of evil and selfishness, and the United States is a good example for this. In 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy attacked a naval base in Pearl Harbour, Hawaii. In response, in 1945 the US dropped two nuclear weapons on Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945 and on Nagasaki on August 9th, 1945. Japan stopped attacking which ended World War II. Are nuclear bombs protecting people in this situation? Clearly not. A numerous number of innocent civilians of Japan were killed in the matter of seconds and many more due to high radiation. This is also the first time nuclear weapon was used against another country. The accumulation of bombs is what world leaders think is safe for their country, the Catholic Church thinks otherwise. The church’s recognizes how world leaders think of these bombs and express their thoughts about these bombs in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which is book that list and explains everything the church believes in. It

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Americans dropping of the Atomic Bomb over Japan under Harry S. Truman Name Institution Americans dropping of the Atomic Bomb over Japan under Harry S. Truman Under the rule of President Truman, USA were ready to use an atomic bomb against Japan. Various options that were suggested to the president for retaliating against Japan, but he decided on the nuclear bomb that has not been in use for a period. Truman based his decision on the past phenomenon such as “the wake of the bloody battles on Iwo and Okinawa. “The essay focuses on the primary objective of the Harry S. Truman, which is dropping the atomic bomb on Japan about the moral dilemma that the president faced.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also nuclear weapons cannot differentiate between military targets and civilians it violates the Geneva Conventions, which protect civilians. The author than talks about how the International Campaign to Ban Nuclear Weapons has convinced many countries to seek abolition of nuclear weapons and how the Treaty of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons have been steps in the right direction. The last point of the article is about how to undo the knowledge to create nuclear bombs. Schlosser believes that the knowledge to create these weapons can be forgotten because as time passes and when there is no nuclear testing, people will forget as they become less…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The military also supports the disarmament of nuclear weapons, as nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction, as a small nuclear bomb can wipe out large tracts of land. These are very hard to defend against, as stated, “Bullets kill men, but atomic bombs kill cities. A tank is a defense against a bullet, but there is no defense against a weapon that can destroy civilization. . . Our defense is law and order”15. One of the problems of nuclear weapons is the slippery slope created by the threat of them.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The uranium around the world mostly lie under land controlled by tribes or indigenous people who don’t support it being mined from the earth. Mostly if they release waste then it will last up to 200-500 years before it actually goes away. This can be very bad to the environment and the U.S. doesn’t have no operating long-term waste storage sites but one is in progress nonetheless it’s already oversubscribed. That means that its nuclear waste will last a long time before it actually leaves and shipping nuclear waste poses an increased potential threat to intercept to nuclear terrorism. Presidio Buzz’s thoughts can show that there are many terrifying things that can happen with using nuclear fission.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Viewpoint 30A “The United States Should Not Drop the Atomic Bomb on Japan.” The Franck Committee, 1945. Dropping a nuclear bomb on Japan would initiate grim political and economic problems in the future of the United States. Without international control of nuclear weapons, a nuclear armaments race is ensured. The Franck Committee states, “...A race for nuclear armaments is certain to ensue following the first revelation of our possession of nuclear weapons to the world” (239).…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Either in the film or in the reality, the risks from nuclear weapons are too big and the use of these weapons is a threat to the humanity. Therefore, using nuclear weapons must be stopped…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The decision to use the atomic bomb posed several significant moral dilemmas for President Harry S. Truman, among these were justifications, alternatives, and complications of the situation. After Teddy Roosevelt 's death, Truman was the new president with a huge decision to make only a few months after. People felt Truman was an insecure man and poorly informed by Roosevelt until his entry to the presidency. It was months later that he learned of America’s dark secret, the Manhattan Project. There were presumably three possible alternatives available to Americans to avoid using the atomic bomb such as invasion, increasing bomb threats and blockades of Japan, and negotiating peace.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this pastoral letter, Bernardin discusses the Catholic Church’s position on the nuclear arms race that occurred. He stresses the importance of a discontinuation of the arms race and the reduction of nuclear proliferation. Furthermore, he focuses on the ethical issues of war in general. He wrote, “The whole world must summon the moral courage and technical means to say no to nuclear conflict; no to weapons of mass destruction; no to an arms race which robs the poor and the vulnerable; and no to the moral danger of a nuclear age which places before humankind indefensible choices of constant terror or surrender. Peacemaking is not an optional commitment.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is a bomb that could wipe out hundreds and thousands of lives powerful? During World War 2 the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from Japan got devastated because of the United States bomb invention which is the nuclear bomb. United States dropped the first bomb on the city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, according to the articles about 65,000 to 200,000 people kick the bucket. After the destruction of Hiroshima, Japan still did not surrender. United States dropped the second bomb on Nagasaki which made them give up, one of the article stated that 39,000 people were assassinated and 25,000 were injured.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Perry

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As it stated in the article, “unlike the original Cold War, this time there is a world of busy fanatics excited by the prospect of a planet with more bombs—people who have already demonstrated the desire to slaughter many thousands of people in an instant, and are zealously pursuing ever more deadly means to do so.” Along with that, people are not as prepared for a nuclear war to happen. I do realize that there is not much you can do if a bomb is dropped in the area you live in, but if everyone was given knowledge about them, it may be able to save some people in the surrounding areas. Many years ago, nuclear wars were a common topic of movies and people thought about the threat of them everyday, but that is the other difference from the times of the Cold War, “Americans no longer think about the threat everyday.” I thought this article was very interesting because I had never thought about how others may look at nuclear weapons, especially those that had experienced wars where these types of weapons were used in the past, like Bill…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consequently, the thread of these bombs have kept any possible large scale war at bay, saving countless millions of lives annually. Truman had to face an unfavorable dilemma in whether or not to drop the bombs or to continue to fight the unyielding country of Japan, and I believe he made the right decision. As previously stated, by no means is killing in any manner moral, but his choice made the most sense, even if it may not have at the time, and was honestly the most just in this given…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The atomic bombs took the lives of way too many innocent men, women, and children. Over one hundred fifty thousand people were killed instantly when the bombs were dropped.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People had threatened war in the past to get what they wanted. Hitler threatened Czechoslovakians with war if they didn’t concede territory to the Third Reich. But nuclear weapons allowed one nation to threaten another with the prospect of death to the majority of their citizens, and the irradiation of their land; thus making it uninhabitable. Nikita Khrushchev is the first name to come to mind for nuclear threats. He did this many times.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some say one day nuclear weapons will be our demise, and others say nuclear weapons are the only reason we are still safe from nuclear war today. People that feel we should keep our nuclear arsenal make the arguments of nuclear weapons give the U.S a fear factor, or edge over other nations ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 5 ).…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays