Essay On Nuclear Technology In Australia

Superior Essays
Australia should definitely produce nuclear technology. Throughout this point in time, Australia is one of the few developed countries not using nuclear technology and energy. Nuclear has been used for over 50 years and supplies nuclear power to over 32 countries, without producing signs of any emissions. Therefore, Australia should develop nuclear technology as the geology of Australia is perfectly stable for the production of nuclear technology and more importantly, we have abundant uranium reserves, with 3 successful uranium mines in Australia. Unfortunately, the cost and nuclear wastage are the biggest challenges standing in the way of the development. That said, these challenges are not entirely undefeatable, and they do not stop a debate over whether nuclear power should be developed in Australia.

Nuclear technology should definitely be developed in Australia as
…show more content…
Nuclear technology will eventually, in time, become competitive with the introduction of any emissions trading scheme or carbon tax

While Australia is not in the process of producing electricity by nuclear power, we do currently have a relatively small amount of low level radioactive waste. In other countries, civil radioactive wastes comprise of about 1% of all toxic wastes, with Australia holding an even lower percentage rate. Low level toxic wastes are commonly disposed of in a shallow repository, which is designed to ensure radioactive material is contained and allows the waste to decay safely. Therefore, waste is not an issue in this case, as all nuclear wastage can be exposed of and this should positively assist the production of nuclear

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Since such fears are mostly unfounded and the positives of nuclear energy outweigh the negatives it is safe to say Australia should adopt nuclear reactors to power their energy needs. The most common argument used against nuclear energy is often that it is a danger to our health, therefore the first step to prove that adopting nuclear power is beneficial, is to prove that it is safer than many other accepted forms of power. To start off with, nuclear energy has by far the fewest accidents of any fuelled plants to date with only 3 major incidents and only two that actually escaped the plant. Many…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, using uranium as an energy source is dangerous and unnecessary to the surrounding environment. It is expensive and is 100%, not the source people are looking for when looking for a safe new energy source. We at “Top Coal Australia” definitely believe that uranium is clearly not safe and that we should continue using coal as it has been trustworthy for thousands of…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the biggest challenge in the nuclear usage is the storage and disposal of nuclear waste (Lipschutz & Dustin p483). Under the current situation, most western countries have reclamation programs to reprocess nuclear waste. Thus, are yet to establish centralized nuclear waste disposal and storage areas or zones. In most instances, countries that do not reprocess nuclear waste are stored in casks or dry storage at the nuclear facilities where the waste is produced. America does not reprocess their nuclear waste.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary audience of this article is subscribers to The Futurist magazine. More specifically it is aimed towards the people who are interested in learning more about the future of nuclear power. This group may encompass anyone ranging from a middle-aged garbage man to a high school teenager or even a grandpa looking out for the generations behind him. A person who wants to know more than the media portrays will read this article. The authors focus mainly on the benefits of nuclear power, but they also bring in the counterarguments to strengthen their argument.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How fear of nuclear power is hurting the environment, is a title that would spike anyone’s curiosity. In 13 minutes and 58 seconds, Michael Shellenberger crafts an argument about how the fear of nuclear energy is unfounded and nuclear energy should be the go to clean energy of the world. Shellenberger starts off his TED talk by claiming to viewers that we are in the middle of a clean energy revolution. He backs this up through empirical evidence in his home state of California and through the examples of Germany, who gets half of their power through solar energy, and India who has promised to expand their energy from solar to that of 10 times California output. He also cites bill gates working in china with their engineers and those of MIT…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    •What level of responsibility does Australia have to ensure that uranium is used for morally correct purposes? Australia has a high level of responsibility to ensure that uranium is used for morally correct purposes. For example, Australia has been shutting down some mine temporarily because of the effects of nuclear radiation to the environment and the people of Australia. •Economically, Australia gets benefits by selling Uranium.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student: Khalid Anwahi Rhetorical Analysis of Scholarly Essay The main argument in the article what role could nuclear power play in limiting climate change? by Robert Rosner and Alex Hearn is that nuclear power plays a great responsibility in hindering the change of weather. The authors point out that it is within the ability of the modern international technical in doing away with fuel produced from the coal firms in the world by the year 2100. They add that it would be more challenging to achieve this by the given time span. The article adds that the hindrances would entail negative public understanding in doing away with the final product of the used nuclear and the concept of security.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Australia has been engage using energy future or as it call, nuclear power and signed a contract around 1951s and in fact, Australia start creating uranium not as much of 2 grams between 1906 till 1932 Australia has exported their production in 1962s After that, large and high grade of uranium has been discovering around Australia, during the same era, the safety has been forcing to take in action to minimise the nuclear producing. However, uranium oxide has been to start move up and carbon an emission has been getting high in the air, nuclear power might be the solution to reduce this amount of pollutions. According to studies that mad, Australia has around 25% of the world’s resources of economic uranium.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Nuclear Energy Ferguson, Charles D. Nuclear Energy: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford UP, 2011. In this book Charles D. Ferguson, president of the Federation of American Scientists, writes about how nuclear energy is formed, the health risks it can cause, and the cost of nuclear energy plants. He gives the three sources to create nuclear energy: fission, fusion, and radioactive decay.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I'm not trying to be pro-nuclear, I'm just pro-arithmetic” said David MacKay, while trying to explain that this was the only option at this point whether anyone liked it or not. The United States is on their toes trying to figure out the best routes to go to create energy: solar and wind, coal, or nuclear. Solar and wind are found to soon die out and have nothing left to support the United States. Coal is a resource which we are running low on and soon will not be able to find, then we have nuclear which can solve most of our problems without running out. The United States should use nuclear energy, because we can recycle warheads into energy, lower the amount of waste we create, and become more efficient.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the nuclear waste is harmful to humans and the environment, however, when the waste is processed and stored correctly, the risks can be…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The revolutionary breakthrough of the fission of atoms created a new field of science that changed the world. In 1945, the splitting of an atom was accomplished when scientist, of the Manhattan Project, tested the first atomic bomb. A few months after the first bomb was tested, America was ready for war. The American Air Force began their journey to Japan where they dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and, a few days later, on Nagasaki. The weapon caused a widespread worry about the bombs ability to take thousands of innocent lives.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year our planet comes into contact with multiple large scale pollution disasters which continue to lead us to our inevitable demise if we don’t change something. Right now, our lives are fueled mostly by Coal, and Oil which create large disasters. Pollutants from these disasters flood into our oceans killing millions of fish, and other sea creatures. The pollutants also get into our air which cause smog in many cities, which can lead to death amongst thousands of small children. The time is now to switch to an alternate source of electricity that is required to save our planet.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Cost Essay

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear power comprises 20% of the world’s energy production. No other form of energy production runs the risk of being taken over by terrorists, or exploding and killing millions of people within a 50 mile radius (Nuclear Power Plants). The United States has 121 government sanctioned nuclear energy power plants in its borders that each cost extreme amounts to build and run. With the U.S. being nearly twenty trillion dollars in debt, it would be wise to stop all further development of nuclear energy.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays