Nuclear Regulatory Commission, A Atomic Weapon Or Atomic Bomb?

1311 Words Apr 27th, 2016 6 Pages
According to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a "dirty bomb" is one type of a radiological dispersal device (RDD) that combines conventional explosives, such as dynamite, with radioactive material. The names “dirty bomb” and RDD are used interchangeably in the media. Most RDDs would not discharge enough radiation to execute individuals or cause serious ailment - the ordinary unstable itself would be more unsafe to people than the radioactive material. In any case, contingent upon the circumstance, a RDD blast could make dread and frenzy, taint property, and require conceivably exorbitant cleanup. Making quick, exact data accessible to general society may keep the frenzy looked for by terrorists.
If we compare “dirty bombs” and nuclear bombs, we will a vast majority of differences. A dirty bomb is not the slightest bit like an atomic weapon or atomic bomb. A nuclear bomb creates an explosion that is known to be millions of times more powerful than that of a dirty bomb. The cloud of radiation from a nuclear bomb could spread tens to hundreds of square miles, whereas a dirty bomb’s radiation could be dispersed within a few blocks or miles of the explosion. A dirty bomb would be considered a “Weapon of Mass Disruption” rather than a “Weapon of Mass Destruction.”
The degree of nearby contamination would rely on upon various variables, including the extent of the hazardous, the sum and kind of radioactive material utilized, the method for dispersal, and climate…

Related Documents