Nuclear Iran Essay

Improved Essays
Nuclear Iran

Iran is one of the leading countries in the Middle East and the Muslim world. The controversial theocratic regime which has been leading the country since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, headed by Ali Khamenei, has been eager to develop and acquire nuclear weapons, despite scrutiny from the international community and the United States. Ever since the revolution took place and the new regime was established, sanctions were put in place against Iran. Even though over the years the country’s desire to acquire nuclear weapons has brought more sanctions, restrictions and worsen diplomatic relations with the world, Iran and its leaders did not give up and eventually managed to obtain them, according to intelligence reports. This act violates the Non-Proliferation Treaty of the UN and many consider it an act of aggression and provocation against the rest of the world. However, one must look beyond the conservativism of the
…show more content…
However, the Persian state and its regime, similarly to any other around the world, is rational and wants to ensure its future existence and security. The presence of such weapons guarantee that no other state would dare to attack or invade them, including the United States, out of fear of nuclear war. This certifies that in the near future Iran will not have the same fate as its neighbors Iraq and Afghanistan, turning into a failed postwar state. On the other hand, a nuclear armed Iran also will serve as an offshore balancer for the United States, against all other middle eastern states such as Saudi Arabia and Israel. Undoubtedly the Persians were a regional super power before acquiring nuclear weapons, due to their big population, strong military and enormous oil reserves. Now following its nuclear armament Iran only solidified its position as a leader in the Middle

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Iraq War Realism

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bush took control of the situation by deciding to invade Iraq. Realism is effective in this argument because it displays the capability, military power and resources that showed US were the dominant powers in the world. United States had worked hard to gain hegemony through war victories and they were not going to let an attack like 9/11 bring the status of the state down. Critics may say that war should not happen just because of self-interest which in this case is maintaining the hegemony. I argue that realist believe that the only way to maintain hegemony is to use authoritative power which is the only way to maintain peace.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to this theory, nations possessing nuclear weapons will not attack other nations because of the potential of an outbreak of nuclear war. In effect, the fear of nuclear war, its chthonic, devastating consequences, and its resultant widespread civilian casualties act as deterrents to the commencement of a major war in the modern age. “Nuclear weapons have helped maintain peace between the great powers and have not led their few other possessors into military adventures”(Waltz). While this simple theory may have been successful in the past 60 years, the precarious way it rests on the ever-growing precipitous cliff of nuclear war cannot be overlooked. A major flaw of the deterrence theory is the the assumption that leaders of countries will act in a rational manner- considering the consequences of their actions on their citizens and citizens of other countries.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons create a risk to nations themselves as they begin to acquire more and more nuclear weapons, especially for nations who are trying to obtain nuclear weapons and have periled relationships with the other states. For example, Pakistan and India are states that have nuclear weapons and their relationship is very sensitive which could collapse at any time for any reason. Although this has not occurred yet, which Waltz would argue, look at the history of Pakistan. Sagan explains that the three theories of the dangers of nuclear weapons actually happened in Pakistan. First, Pakistan became an increasingly aggressive conventional state because of the nuclear shield.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, the U.S. hopes to stop Tehran’s support of terrorism. Because some sanctions still remain in place, the U.S. can still promote Iranian democracy and human rights. The main U.S. goal by far is to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. The JCPOA practically ensures that Iran obtains nothing even close to that. Accordingly, the U.S. has met their main goals through this…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Iran has an abundance of natural resources, mainly oil and gas. But the United States has pressured the UN to oppose sanctions upon Iran, which in turn makes it hard for Iran to sell their oil because the United States consumes 25% of the world’s oil. If Iran were to develop nuclear weapons then they could get the sanction removed by threatening the western world with a nuclear launch. Hegemonic internationalism in this case, is the building of nuclear arms because once Iran has nukes, they can flex their muscles a little bit and nations will give in to their demands. A good example of this is how Nazi Germany flexed its muscles in taking over Poland and the world’s…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet by the time the time the rest of the world reacts to the cheater nation could be possibly too late. Also if the only thing that is keeping a nation from building nuclear weapons is the threat that other nations have the “know how” to build them and use them against you. What is stopping that nation from building nuclear weapons, because once they possess them they know they will not be…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cold War: The Arms Race

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thus the arms race began. Both of these countries aimed to create more and more nuclear weapons in order to have the upper hand which had major effects on relations. This arms race between the US and the Soviet Union and nuclear proliferation resulted in a more stable, but tense relationship. Nuclear proliferation had started with the end of the Manhattan project, commonly known as the…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The scientist who was in charge of the research was Igor Kurchatov. Although the Soviets had some of the smartest minds of the time, they still needed answers. Igor and many of his colleagues needed to gather new information from the United States, especially the Manhattan Project. In order to achieve this, the need for spies came into effect. The mission of the nuclear weapons program was to build and have a flawless atomic bomb, before the United…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States willingness to negotiate with Iran brought the entire U.N. council to support America. This breakthrough in U.N. support led to huge economic stress in Iran, which, come election time, translated to a change in government. This new government is the gaping hole that offers new possibilities for negotiations with Iran. Once Obama had convincingly stated why this new Iran nuclear deal would succeed, he proceeded to go into detail about what the new deal entailed, and how it would prevent Iran from creating a nuclear weapon. (For complete details on the Iran nuclear…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nuclear Deterrence Theory

    • 2178 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The nuclear deterrence theory is a common term used in international relations. This theory gained prominence during the Cold War with regard to the use of nuclear weapons. Nuclear deterrence in short means to deter one state from attacking another with its nuclear weapons, that is, the state is discouraged from attacking. As a result of its extreme destructive power, nuclear weapons could deter more powerful adversaries. The nuclear deterrence theory is and has always been a theory that many states have made allusions to since the Cold War to solve foreign conflicts.…

    • 2178 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays