Nuclear Energy Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
Hello Mr. Wolfe, I have written to you in a genu matter. The matter of the usage of nuclear energy in our state should be stopped. I understand nuclear power is currently playing a large role in our environment. However, we should stop using nuclear power plants for many reasons. Some of the reasons include pollution for aquatic life and their high cost. Those are just the tip of the iceberg Mr. Wolfe, and as your advisor, I’m only trying to help our state.

Mr. Wolfe, there are copious amounts of reasons of getting rid of nuclear energy in our state that I think that you should listen to. One reason that we shouldn’t be using nuclear energy is because of radioactive waste which is produced from the use of nuclear energy. Once
…show more content…
Nuclear energy, and the use of it, has been used for weapons and items to destroy the Earth, rather than making the world a better place to live in. Using nuclear energy involves strict protocol and huge amounts of responsibility to avoid any major accidents that would devastate the area surrounding the site of the accident. Power plants are common targets for militant and terrorist organizations, and the general security of the compound has always been at risk and of high concern. One mess up from security and someone could take advantage of the mistake, and once they take advantage of the mistake, the fate of the world, depending on the size and destruction rate of the given nuclear components, could be in their hands. Nevertheless, there are more consequences in the pursuit of nuclear energy. In the light of one fault in using nuclear energy is that it impacts aquatic life. A result of radioactive waste, which nuclear power plants create, helps to cause eutrophication. Eutrophication can affect plant life in the water for the reason that minerals could cause algae to grow, which would block sunlight from the reach of the plants at the bottom of the water. Coupled with the impact on aquatic life, nuclear power plants also have a tremendous impact on human life as well. On August 6, 1945, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki were obliterated by nuclear bombs. For this very catastrophe, five decades after the bombing, children are still being born with the aftereffects of the booms from their family trees. Currently, there is no cure for the affected children and

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Nuclear Question: Should Australia Partake Almost 40% of all enriched uranium begins its half-life in Australia but none of this is being used to generate energy in Australia. This is mostly due to the negative stigma that accompanies nuclear power. The fear of meltdowns, accidents and sabotage has lead the general populace to influence legislation against the use of nuclear power. Their fears, however, are unfounded as nuclear power is profitable, efficient and above all safe.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. “Why the World May Turn to Nuclear Power” is a passage that lays out all of the main components of Nuclear energy. It is filled with statistics and real world examples, including visual aids. The major purpose of this text is to inform the reader that nuclear power is in fact a beneficial form of energy. Three images on page 18 show nuclear power in action.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the term Nuclear Power or Nuclear Energy is used usually the first thing that comes to mind for most people are war, bombs, deformed humans, and destruction. In fact, these are four things that least occur in the nuclear field. Yes, war, bombs, and what not are used, but also most of all the nuclear energy used in today’s society comes in the form of production of electricity. Therefore, we do get something good out of it.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It's easy to think that nuclear power plants are a great benefit for the united states because it will has smaller carbon footprints, it will help with air pollution however, if a nuclear accident were to happen air pollution wouldn't be the problem, radiation would be the problem. This would mean that people would not be able to survive in that area and would need to evacuate. This is worse than any other problem. To wrap it all up nuclear power is not reliable and shouldn’t be passed in the united states because it takes a long time, nuclear accidents , and it attracts…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saying “No” to Nuclear Power As of 2003, 49,000 metric tons of nuclear waste has been produced in the United States alone. Every day, more and more of this incredibly dangerous substance is released into our planet’s soil. Nuclear power seems like a good idea on the surface, but obviously, it is not the answer. Nuclear power is too dangerous, too expensive, and unable to be contained, therefore it should not be the world’s primary source of energy.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All sources except for “Thorium”, Ian Schultz’s article and the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency conclude that nuclear energy is reliable. The sources that do not state this deal with other aspects concerning nuclear energy such as cost and fuel. Another trend is the low cost of nuclear energy after the initial build of the plant, which is concluded by every source, but “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, “Unmatched Reliability” and “CO2 emission of electricity from nuclear power stations”. Finally, all sources but “Thorium”, the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ian Schultz’s report, “Unmatched Reliability” and “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, discuss the low pollution of nuclear energy which is the last key point of my essay. • All of the sources are credible sources, because they are relevant, produced recently and are either organizations, education sites or databases.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the atomic bomb was dropped nuclear physicists began looking into other uses for nuclear power. A decade later scientist were able to productively generate nuclear power into an alternative source for electricity. Nuclear reactor generate 17 percent of the electricity around the world reaching a remarkable high compared to previous years (Martin). Plants can generate more than a gigawatt of electricity which is about one million megawatts of energy. That’s why using nuclear power for electricity is beneficial.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chernobyl and Fukushima: Two of the biggest nuclear disasters in history. When thinking about nuclear safety, the issue of a potential meltdown will always follow nuclear energy. A nuclear meltdown occurs when the nuclear reactor is unable to be cooled down and hot melted radioactive fuel can spill and be released outside the plant. The main opposition against nuclear energy lies in the danger of a meltdown. Admittedly, these disasters have caused devastating damage.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The documentary that was first shown in 2013 and is approximately 83 minutes long, does an excellent job of creating a debate about the perception of nuclear energy in challenging global climate change during the 21st century. This documentary film's main argument is that nuclear power, yet contradicted by many environmentalists, is a relatively safe and harmless source of energy if compared to other energy sources and can counteract…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This contrasts to coal fired units which emit copious amounts of substances that aren’t immediately deadly, and didn’t require immediate attention when they were first created thus leading to the environmental state we’re currently in. even though it’s true that nuclear fallout can be a serious problem, many reactors have several containment precautions. Even the incident at Three Mile Island which scared a nation into halting production of nuclear energy was mostly contained, and there have been no identifiable negative health effects [9]. Even considering the amount of current deaths because of both nuclear and fossil fuels, studies show that the amount of energy being produced by nuclear power instead of fossil fuels has actually saved tens of thousands of lives. The study estimated that for each terawatt hour of electricity produced, an average of 26.67 lives are lost whereas a terawatt hour of nuclear electricity kills an average of 0.074 people (stats relevant for Europe)…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Also nuclear radioactivity has a disastrous effect on aquatic life if neglected. “Reports say that radioactive wastes take almost 10,000 years to get back to the original form”(Risks) and radioactivity has a heightened effect on aquatic animals. Along with the 60 people killed in the Chernobyl disaster, there is still an estimated death toll of 4,000-25,000 latent cancer deaths. This grueling number is a testament to how potentially dangerous a nuclear power plant can become if ignored. Because of these reasons, countries around the world have strayed from constructing new nuclear…

    • 1358 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today our world is powered by many new sources like wind using the air currents, solar harvesting the sunlight, or geothermal manipulating the water, and many more as well. Even though we have all these power sources most of them are location oriented so most of our energy is created by two sources fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and petroleum) and nuclear. Coal and natural gas make up most of our energy, but why am I telling you this it’s because coal energy is a giant now but it is slowly ruining our environment. That’s why the future of our energy should be nuclear.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today I am going to talk about the topic of nuclear power. A local Nuclear Power Plant has come up with the idea to build a power plant in the town of Enola, PA. As the governor of Harrisburg, I am persuaded you to allow this to happen. There are three reasons you should allow this to happen. One reason is that it doesn’t cause pollution.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also there was a copious amount of radiation exposure in the air and water supply. Despite the various controversial issues revolving around nuclear energy, the benefits are too big to pass up. In order to sustain a growing population, the United States will soon require large sums of electricity that only nuclear resources can provide. Although it is true that nuclear power plants come with possible negative effects, technological advances continue to diminish these problems. In other words, nuclear power is continuing to become more reliable and it is all uphill from here.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was the biggest nuclear disaster since Chernobyl, and nothing could have been done to prevent it, as there is no stopping nature. Then, in any extreme natural event, there is a risk of damage to a plant 's structure or contents, which could easily result in a release of contaminants. Nuclear energy has immense power, and it 's not surprising that that power can be harvested in a detrimental way. There is no remedy for the effects of radiation, which can cause cancer, genetic mutations, and a drastically shorter life expectancy. Given this, nuclear power plants are a prime target for acts of terrorism.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays