Energy And Nuclear Energy

Superior Essays
What is Nuclear energy
In the terms of theoretical physics energy is the ability to do work. You apply force and you get displacement. In a more practical world energy is heat, electricity, light etc. Per the theory of thermodynamics; energy is never destroyed it is changes form. I.e. heat/thermal energy converts to mechanical energy to move a car, nuclear energy to electric energy. Two major energy sources that the civilization requires now-a-days are, electricity and heat. Sun, the source of heat/thermal energy & light is incessant, at least for the next few thousand years. Electricity and Mechanical energy on the other hand doesn’t have an efficient sustainable source. Fossil fuel, crude oil and natural gasses are used to create those energies.
…show more content…
It is efficient as in one small plant produces enough energy to run a about 100 homes for about a 1000 year without refueling. Now imagine this times a few hundreds. if all the world used nuclear plants for eighty percent of their energy consumption instead of fossil fuels and natural gasses the world will produce energy efficiently and in massive amounts, which will benefit us globally, socially, economically, and lastly and most importantly Environmentally. It reduces carbon dioxide production by a lot, and the cost of producing nuclear energy is much lesser than the cost of fossil fuel and natural gasses. Biggest plus point is that it is sustainable; as the energy is produced by a chain reaction and radioactive decay (most used elements have a half-life of at least a few centuries). This means that we won’t suddenly run out of nuclear energy source like natural resources. Nuclear energy is sustainable; we have enough radioactive elements to serve hundred percent of the worlds energy needs for at least the next few hundred years. Because most elements used in nuclear plants, Uranium235 has the half-life of about four thousand five hundred million years. This goes to say that even that if the whole world converts to using nuclear energy we will be good for at least a next few centuries. Now moving on from sustainability to environmental safety, nuclear plants are environmentally friendly; they do not emit carbon dioxide (CO2) or carbon monoxide (CO) that causes global warming. Trees do not get cut down because wood is not a necessary raw material for nuclear production. It’s environmentally clean and after the first few years cheap and affordable. Which means that if all off the world’s energy was produces from nuclear plant it would create long and steady jobs for all everyone in all areas of study. Global energy consumption is beyond limits and for that the society requires a source that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Nuclear power has a lot of benefits, especially towards the environment. For example, in Document A, it states that “nuclear power production releases no pollutants into the air.” Meaning that while the nuclear power plant is giving out energy for us, it’s not harming the environment. This is important because since it's not releasing any air pollutants, then its not releasing any greenhouse gasses, the earth’s temperature is going to decrease. It's a win win for both the humanity and Earth.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of TMI

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think we should keep TMI(Three Mile Island) because the positives outweigh the cons. In my opinion, keeping TMI would be a good idea because of the amount of energy it can produce. If they closed TMI then a lot of people would lose their jobs. TMI produces emission free energy unlike coal or other fuels. If TMI closes, then Pennsylvania's main source of energy would be coal or propane which is very bad for the air.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear energy has been tried and tested over the years and has been reliable. The technical feasibility is also in place, we already have nuclear reactors that are up and running, we even are in the development process of fusion reactors, which will be even more efficient. Unfortunately, this is where the viability of nuclear power starts to fall apart. In his TED talk Joe Lassiter, a senior fellow at Harvard Business School and a climate change researcher, says it best: “So what's holding new nuclear back? Outdated regulations and yesterday's mindsets.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socolow and Alexander Glaser contains four main arguments. First, nuclear power is capable of making a notable effort of doing away with climate change (Socolow & Glaser, 2009). Secondly, the world is not in a safe position for an immediate international increase of nuclear power (Socolow & Glaser, 2009). Thirdly, a globe that is to some extent safe for nuclear energy could mushroom as an advantage of the nuclear disarmament activity (Socolow & Glaser, 2009). The last argument is that the next decade is in a critical condition.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With its cheap cost to produce and provide electricity and it’s flawless safety record, the benefits of nuclear power definitely outweigh its risks. Secondly looking at the effects of nuclear power on the environment, nuclear power is cleaner than many forms of energy. According to ehow.com, the two main byproducts of generating nuclear power are water and radioactive waste used as fuel for the reactors. while this may sound bad, waste storage is not a huge issue. Much of the nuclear waste is able to be recycled into more fuel products, reducing the amount of waste actually needing…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saying “No” to Nuclear Power As of 2003, 49,000 metric tons of nuclear waste has been produced in the United States alone. Every day, more and more of this incredibly dangerous substance is released into our planet’s soil. Nuclear power seems like a good idea on the surface, but obviously, it is not the answer. Nuclear power is too dangerous, too expensive, and unable to be contained, therefore it should not be the world’s primary source of energy.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Low pollution, Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. Nuclear energy has one of the least effect on nature, since it doesn’t discharge any greenhouse gasses. Low operating cost, Nuclear power produces very inexpensive electricity. Since the cost of a nuclear reactor is anywhere between from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being used. Reliability, There has been an estimation that with the current rate of consumption of uranium, We may have enough uranium for 70-80 years.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Essay Nuclear

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Following are some of the challenges that we face in using nuclear power as a sustainable and ethical source of energy : Handling Nuclear Wastes: On one hand Nuclear energy seems to be a sustainable way forward, not emitting greenhouse gases and producing far less waste material. On the other hand, it is not truly green; it involves mining, recycling and refining of radioactive waste…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The problem is that why do we think nuclear power is good? And why not use wood or coal or something other that nuclear power. Science has identified this issue when they monitored how much resources we use and we have to understand how we won’t run out of resources. This issue affects us because one day we will run out of resources such as coal gas or oil and it will lead to a difficult like which will affect human population. Uranium has several uses and one of them is to power a nuclear power plant.…

    • 3158 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear power is a better benefit to atmosphere and the world itself than coal. Nuclear power releases less greenhouse gases than coal making it environmentally friendly. For this reason we are better off choosing nuclear power rather than coal. Coal power plants are one of the biggest contributors to global warming. On the other hand nuclear power plants release little to no harmful gasses into the atmosphere.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another plus of Nuclear energy is its footprint on the area of the earth is very small. Wind and solar take up quite a bit of area. Even though the wind turbine itself only takes up a small area, the land around it is pretty much useless except to let farm animals graze. Solar panels can use some useless space on top of buildings, but that doesn’t really amount to enough energy, so solar farms are built. A nuclear reactor can be the size of a semi truck, fit in a submarine, or the size of a house.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Energy is the power derived from the utilization of physical or chemical resources, especially to provide light and heat or to work machines. Energy is all around us and can be created from many things such as oil, natural gas, coal, wood, water, wind, and petroleum. Most industrial nations use fossil fuels, which are natural fuels formed in the geological past from the remains of living organisms such as coal, natural gas and oil to be driving force that powers their modern industrial societies. These fuels are unable to be recreated, so the rate of consumption of these resources is at a staggeringly high rate. Non-renewable resources are finite, which means one we use them they are gone, and renewable resource are ones that are renewed by…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year our planet comes into contact with multiple large scale pollution disasters which continue to lead us to our inevitable demise if we don’t change something. Right now, our lives are fueled mostly by Coal, and Oil which create large disasters. Pollutants from these disasters flood into our oceans killing millions of fish, and other sea creatures. The pollutants also get into our air which cause smog in many cities, which can lead to death amongst thousands of small children. The time is now to switch to an alternate source of electricity that is required to save our planet.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays