In a perfect world climate change, wouldn’t be a problem, people wouldn’t go hungry, you don’t have to choose to get skittles or sour patch your mom would buy you both and many other things. And say in this perfect world we found a solution. The solution was to make humans autotrophic reducing our carbon foot print then maybe even reversing global warming. But even if this were to happen other problems would arise such as people having to change their lifestyles, tons more of water will be drank.
But just saying let’s make everyone autotrophic won’t work so we must figure out a way to make everyone autotrophic. Let’s use Mr. greens way, this is where already autotrophic people pollenate other people to also make them autotrophic. And this would be great but there would also be drawbacks. So, let’s elaborate what was said before. Okay so the good is that everyone would drastically decrease their carbon foot print this I because people won’t need to farm food. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations states that agriculture is responsible for 18% of the total release of …show more content…
We can start with the 786 million people who don’t have access to water. How are these people expected to survive? How are these people even surviving right now? But as autotrophs water will be needed since we won’t be getting war from food either. Plus, how will people react when they find out they’re growing plants on their chins. People don’t like change. And maybe becoming an autotroph doesn’t man were going to have natural instincts either. Also in most definitive some people don’t know what’s going on f we make the autotroph without their consent. Not everybody thinks climate change or our carbon footprint is a problem (also, not everyone wants to be an autotroph). So, this is where we (autotrophs) make the decision for