Question 1 part A
The first thing you should do is state the facts. As a journalist, you should already identify the facts because that is what your story is about. Understanding the facts of the case by stating all the facts and issues going on. The second in the list is our values. You should outline your value and say “What is important to me and what are you willing to give up for this value?” The value affects our final decision because your decision cannot go against your values. The values also help the third step in the potter box, principles. Based on our values, we have to apply the ethical principles we have learned before.
I think value would be the most important because it affects your decision in the long run. It also affects …show more content…
If your name wasn’t on there then that means you weren’t the author and the company solidified that with them not paying you, but your newspaper did get the money and that is where one your loyalties lie. The public is informed of a place to go to for a better retirement home, they knows it is an advertisement based on the disclaimer on the top. The public just doesn’t know who you are. Newspapers can have and the ad paid for a spot on it. I think them not paying you specifically made it, so they weren’t influencing your writing. The client themselves, have your loyalty so I think that you did them a good service by following through with the interviews and not bad mouthing them in the advertorial. My values were loyalty and the truth. I think that I would let them publish it without my name being on it and without getting paid. SPJ made it more clearly that even with publishing without your name in it is ethical and publishing an ad by a journalist is okay if you inform your readers about what is going …show more content…
You only let in people that you choose and you can give them that information. The moment that goes away is when an ethical issue should arise. It is kind of taking about someone freedom and someone’s right to some sort of privacy. This app can get all of your information by you just click I agree and it gives you both the negative and positive comments instead having that in the first place. You actually don’t have to create the profile someone else can create it for you and all you have to do is hit select and all your privacy is out the window. Peeples is the yelp for your personal life app. You can get rated on as a person and it can lead to bully which leads to so many horrible and psychological problems for some people. You can actually search people on it and you can have their information without them making a
The first thing you should do is state the facts. As a journalist, you should already identify the facts because that is what your story is about. Understanding the facts of the case by stating all the facts and issues going on. The second in the list is our values. You should outline your value and say “What is important to me and what are you willing to give up for this value?” The value affects our final decision because your decision cannot go against your values. The values also help the third step in the potter box, principles. Based on our values, we have to apply the ethical principles we have learned before.
I think value would be the most important because it affects your decision in the long run. It also affects …show more content…
If your name wasn’t on there then that means you weren’t the author and the company solidified that with them not paying you, but your newspaper did get the money and that is where one your loyalties lie. The public is informed of a place to go to for a better retirement home, they knows it is an advertisement based on the disclaimer on the top. The public just doesn’t know who you are. Newspapers can have and the ad paid for a spot on it. I think them not paying you specifically made it, so they weren’t influencing your writing. The client themselves, have your loyalty so I think that you did them a good service by following through with the interviews and not bad mouthing them in the advertorial. My values were loyalty and the truth. I think that I would let them publish it without my name being on it and without getting paid. SPJ made it more clearly that even with publishing without your name in it is ethical and publishing an ad by a journalist is okay if you inform your readers about what is going …show more content…
You only let in people that you choose and you can give them that information. The moment that goes away is when an ethical issue should arise. It is kind of taking about someone freedom and someone’s right to some sort of privacy. This app can get all of your information by you just click I agree and it gives you both the negative and positive comments instead having that in the first place. You actually don’t have to create the profile someone else can create it for you and all you have to do is hit select and all your privacy is out the window. Peeples is the yelp for your personal life app. You can get rated on as a person and it can lead to bully which leads to so many horrible and psychological problems for some people. You can actually search people on it and you can have their information without them making a