Np Us Meeting Analysis

Compared to the author’s first N.P.U meeting, which was N.P.U. E the author thought both meeting run very efficiently. There were a few things that the author did like more about meeting M then she did E however. For instance, there was a microphone so that people in the very back could hear. Also room was very spacious and the chairs were positioned to where you felt the meeting was a group effort. It also gave you a chance to meet the person sitting next or across from you. However, there were no agendas for people attending the meeting, which made it a little harder to follow along. N.P.U. E did provided agendas to all people attending their meeting. Overall, the author enjoyed both meetings and thought they ran well and were consistent with each other.
My findings were consistent with my research on community power and did make a direct correlation. The system has a formal structure were there are elected offices by the residents. Each neighborhood planning unit meeting that the author attended showed a clear sense of power by its officers. The officers had the power to either approve …show more content…
The readers got an inside look on two different N.P.U.’s and how their meeting were conducted. All in all, the author concluded that these too particular N.P.U’s were very strong. The reader also got learn about community power. Community power is the ability to make change or decisions within a community. N.P.U.’s and community power goes hand-in-hand, whether the N.P.U. is strong or weak. N.P.U. M and E was both demonstrated they could run effectively and get the work done. If the author was able to redo this study, she would have attended two more N.P.U’s but on the south side of Atlanta’s city limits. The author thought by including these two extra meeting, her outcome may have possible be