Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity (NGRI)

Improved Essays
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity(NGRI)
Intro
The criminal justice system is utilized to punish those who violate the laws and to protect the rights of the people who abide by the laws. However, there are instances where the criminal act of an individual are not punished through imprisonment. In these instances they individual may have a mental illness, which is causing them to not understand the consequences of their actions. The law is aware of instances such as this and has created a plea of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI). In receiving this verdict, the individual will be sent to a mental health facility to be treated for their mental illness instead of being sent to prison and being punished for the criminal act. The symptoms of
…show more content…
In addition, these individuals may not be able to recognize that the crime that they have committed was wrong.
- Flaws o There are several flaws to the M’Naughten rule. The basis of not knowing per the M’Naughten rule alone was weak. Not knowing that the crime committed is right or wrong could be contributed to the ignorance of the accused. The accused could be faking the fact that they did not know what they were doing was wrong. The M’Naughten rule questions the accused ability to understand the consequences moreso than the accused mental capacity in understanding the criminal act and the possible punishment for that act.
Durham Rule
- The Durham rule was later developed as an extension to the M’Naughten rule. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in the 1954 Durham vs. United States case ruled that “an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of a mental disease or defect” (www.dorianchialant.com).
- Evidence to prove
…show more content…
He was found incompetent to stand trial and admitted into a mental hospital. He was tried once he gained competence two years later. Although he was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia at the time of the crime, Arizona only went by the second half of the M’Naghten rule, understanding that your actions are wrong, to determine insanity. Due to this Clark did not get the insanity plea and was sentenced to 25 years in prison. An appeal hearing was held in June 2006, stating that by Arizona eliminating the first portion of the M’Naghten rule it violated Clark’s due process rights. The courts held in favor of Arizona stating that insanity standards are open to state choice (2004).
Clark vs. Arizona relevance
- It is important that the evaluating mental health professional to be aware of state standards for the insanity defense. The statues vary by state. The role of the mental health professional is to prove the mental illness of the defendant at the time of the criminal act to assist in the Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity plea.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Case Of Andrea Yates

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Texas uses a combination of the McNaughton and Irresistible Impulse Test. On the McNaughton test the defendant must be suffering from a defect or disease of the mind, not be aware of what they did it or whether it was right or wrong to be found insane. However, on the Irresistible Impulse Test if a defendant is cognitively aware of what they did was right and wrong , but cannot stop themselves from acting a certain way they can be found insane. Some psychiatrists and legal scholars have criticized both tests for failing to allow for degrees of incapacity. The presence of postpartum psychosis may significantly impair a woman 's mental stability but still not satisfy the cognitive test or even the irresistible-impulse test (Nau, McNiel, & Binder, 2012) .…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The presence of this plea option has led to controversy in the law world; some think that the plea should be diminished while others notice its necessity. Nevertheless, there are people with mental illness in our society that commit crimes just as those without mental illness do. There should be a system that protects the rights of those with mental illness, but there is a lot of grey area with the current system in place because it is difficult to tell if the person was not in a sane state at the time the crime took place when the trial often occurs months later. Those who plea guilty by reason of insanity are required to go through an extensive psychological…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 20, 1998, Kipland Kinkel went on a shooting rampage at Thurstone High School. After the shooting spree Kipland was arrested and convicted of four counts of murder and twenty-six attempted counts of murder, with a total sentence time of 111 years and eight months. Four years into the 111-year sentence, the attorneys of Kipland Kinkel appealed the initial sentencing. In the “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel,” Judge Haselton offers information on the original trial, the grounds of the appeal and the state’s decision to uphold the sentence. Judge Haselton utilizes the rhetorical tools of ethos, pathos and logos to support the court’s decision to deny the appeal.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Authors Larry Siegel and John Worrell, The M’Naghten rule, enacted in 1843, deems a person insane if, “at the time she committed the act she stands…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mrs. Andrea Yates past life showed that she has had a history of mental illness. Mrs. Andrea Yates had been brought to the hospital many times for strings of mental cases that she had received treatment for because she had harsh depression and the depression came due to psychosis. One time when Yates was in the hospital, she was described as an intensely psychotic woman. Yates has tried many times to commit suicide; for instance one time she tried to overdose by using antidepressants and even after that did not work she attempted to murder herself by stabbing herself. Yates has been through unfavorable paranoia.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003, Andre Thomas viciously attacked and killed his ex-wife and her two children, and was sentenced to death row. His defense argued that he was not eligible for death row because of his mental state. The court ignored the argument and passed it off, saying that they were using his illness as an excuse to “get out of” maximum punishment. As demonstrated in this case, mental illness is not given the attention it deserves when determining a sentence. Cases such as these have aroused concern how fair the criminal court is towards the mentally ill.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For an individual to be blameworthy and criminally responsible for their actions, the accused person must have committed the actus reus and the mens rea. In the case of the accused pleading Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD), the court focuses on whether the accused had the mens rea while committing the alleged offence (Verdun-Jones, 2015). If the accused person did not know what he or she was doing was wrong, or did not appreciate the conduct or omission, the accused will not be found criminally responsible (Verdun-Jones, 2015). Overall, if the accused is found NCRMD, he or she will most likely be apprehended in the hospital, or supervised in the community to keep the citizens safe from a possible reoccurring…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mental Illness In Jails

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In that case, with the obstacles the police faces when dealing with mental illness situations, there are two serious issues appears from the current state of criminalization with someone having a mental illness and injury or death as a result of their contact with the police. As noted, officers are in the position to be first responders to serious mental health emergencies; police intervention accounts for a significant amount of referrals into care estimates of 15-40% of the mentally disordered is currently in jails and prisons (Adelman, 2003). Majority of arrest of mentally ill people are for non-serious crimes such as minor theft, noise or disruptions complaints, failure to appear in court following other charges that was either directly or indirectly related to their illness. A study by Rogers, suggest that lack of advance knowledge of mental illness was a contributing factor to arrest (1990). As a result, an arrest was often the only step available for officers in situation where individuals were not sufficiently disturbed too be accepted by hospitals but were too public in their deviance to be ignored.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marley Lyster PHIL 1000 Assignment 2 Prompt 2 Susan Wolf’s compatibilist predisposition evaluates moral responsibility with her “Deep Self View.” Not only does she argue that events can be fully fixed and determined and one can have some freedom in action, but also that the agent only has moral responsibility in these actions if they are in control of their deepest desires (Wolf, 460). After presenting this view, Wolf uses her example of JoJo to demonstrate a hole in her own Deep Self View that can be patched by the addition of a sanity clause (Wolf, 462). Should her compatibilist view be accepted, the sanity clause does justly remedy the blatant weakness JoJo reveals in her Deep Self View to resolve her argument’s inadequacy.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to briefly explain the process in which the Mental Health Court executes when solving problems that combine legal and mental health issues. The importance to raise awareness about this matter is with the sole intention to reduce criminal actions and improve the quality of life of the person who takes part in this activity. Many people will argue that this type of problem-solving court system might not be necessary to correct the criminal behavior; however, evidence based practice may demonstrate otherwise. The King County’s therapeutic courts handle people with mental illness differently from the other defendants; their main goal is to give criminals with a mental illness the treatment that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The amount of individual that go through the criminal justice system that have a mental illness has become a growing issue in the criminal justice system. Many individual that enter the criminal justice system are bound to end up in prison, where they have little access to mental health help. The amount of individual that enter the criminal justice system that have a serious mental illness is estimated to be 16.9 percent. These individuals are usually repeat offenders that circulate through the system because they do not receive the treatment that they need. (Almquist & Dodd, 2009).…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays