Argumentative Essay On North Korea

Improved Essays
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, more commonly known as North Korea, is a country founded on September 9th, 1948 after being liberated from the Japanese by the Russians while South Korea was liberated by the United States of America. South Korea took on a Democratic government similar to the US while North Korea took on a Communist government similar to Russia. This caused a serious divide between the countries. Roughly two years later North Korea invaded South Korea with support from Russia and China as an attempt to convert Korea into a full on communist country. This began the Korean War, with the allies of the North and South fighting for land. The war resulted in 2.5 million deaths but a ceasefire was agreed upon in 1953, …show more content…
It has had many opportunities to join the global community but has thrown those chances away with multiple nuclear arms tests that go directly against the UN’s orders. North Korea is a country that has the power to start a World War or Cold War between the US, Russia, China, and other countries around the world. No one would win. The food aid the country is given is not equally served among the citizens and as a result they are not getting the food and shelter they need. The North Korean government refuses to negotiate and continue to run a dictatorship. People were worried about what North Korea could do to America before the turn of the century and the fear is still present today. North Korea needs a new government with capable and responsible people in charge. The country does not need to have its food aid cut off nor does it need a 100% embargo. Any and all materials related to nuclear weapon construction as well as militaristic construction or weaponry should be banned from being sold to North Korea with a strong push China to follow the embargo. While China is most likely to deny these requests this may cut down on the amount of these materials transferred, slowing the building process of nuclear weaponry and weakening the militaristic strength of North Korea. North Korea is a major issue in the world that with consistent deterrents will collapse, allowing the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to truly be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In an article from the bulletin of atomic scientist says, that if US does get rid of all there weapons it won’t cause countries like North Korea and Iran to get rid of their weapons. This proves that it is unreasonable to get rid of all weapons in the world because not all countries will cooperate in global disarmament. After the 9/11 attack people have been paranoid of another attack. To calm themselves they spend money on weapons for protection, that is the military budget has been increasing in america. If the US keeps spending money then all the other countries will raise their budget on the military to try to keep on pace with US because they do not want to be behind.…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sovereignty In North Korea

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This is a perfect example because the North Koreans know they should not be able to have nuclear power yet they flaunt their power and threaten the United States. This violent conflict has caused problems amongst various country’s such as South Korea and China has had to reason with the U.S. to talk about how to address the problem with North Korea. This type of Realism shows that King John Un cares about nothing but power and how the rest of the world will view him and his…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So that, the countries which have nuclear weapons must to limit them. We all know, it will be a disaster to normal people if use it like the second war in Hiroshima. Second reduce nuclear weapons. At any time nuclear power is the biggest threat in the world. Defend country can not be the reason to research nuclear weapons.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mutually assured destruction prevented an outbreak of nuclear warfare during the Cold War. The stance against the employment of nuclear weapons arose from shifting norms in international society, as states were prompted to dedicate themselves to preventative war. Additionally, it was challenged whether the enormously devastating impact of nuclear weapons was ethically sound and whether it could be effectively used militarily. The notion that there was no winner to a nuclear war, however, predominately restricted states from resorting to nuclear warfare. The was no nuclear conflict in the Cold War because of mutually assured destruction.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The connection of the previous arguments against the use of nuclear weapons to the requirements of both jus ad bellum and jus in bello is that nuclear weapons do not accomplish with the main purpose of Just War Tradition, which is preventing and saving innocent lives. The long-term dangers of radioactive fallout and environmental contamination potentially affect innocent people, allies, enemies, or even one’s own population. Hence, since the side effects of nuclear weapons can’t be measure or controlled, can’t be ever justifiable. The psychologist Eric Fromm supports part of this view by claiming that logic of the way that wars back in the day used to be, are not the same, nor hold for the same standards for modern nuclear wars. The pacifist position argues that the use of nuclear weapons will always be morally wrong because: “1) their use will result in widespread noncombatant deaths and 2) the destructive effects of such weapons will necessarily be out of proportion to any political or military objectives achieved” (p.208).…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also nuclear weapons cannot differentiate between military targets and civilians it violates the Geneva Conventions, which protect civilians. The author than talks about how the International Campaign to Ban Nuclear Weapons has convinced many countries to seek abolition of nuclear weapons and how the Treaty of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons have been steps in the right direction. The last point of the article is about how to undo the knowledge to create nuclear bombs. Schlosser believes that the knowledge to create these weapons can be forgotten because as time passes and when there is no nuclear testing, people will forget as they become less…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Napalm, Agent Orange, communism, and death: the Vietnam War can be difficult to understand. However, American involvement in the Vietnam War was not justified because it did not fulfill the requirements of jus ad bellum. The United States did not have just cause or the right intent to fight yet they still sent millions of soldiers over in an effort to win. Our reasoning was not clear, war was not formally declared by congress, and there were no extraneous circumstances that would cause us to enter this Asian country. An easy victory was not probable and the U.S. allowed the situation to careen way out of control.…

    • 2738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Democratic party failed to accept any peace candidates. This made people turn their backs against their own government. More and more radical and anti-war activities spread around the country. In 1969, Johnson’s successor, Richard Nixon failed to deliver his promise of peace (Hun 162). He tried to end the war by force but North Vietnam would not give up.…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You have to know your enemy before you can fight and defeat them. If saying Islamic terrorism is too difficult, defeating them will be impossible and this much Trump knows. Trump has profited politically as he comprehends the nation’s frustration when he said, “President Obama disgracefully refused to even say the words ‘Radical Islam.’ For that reason alone, he should step down. If Hillary Clinton, after this attack, still cannot say the two words ‘Radical Islam’ she should get out of this race for the Presidency.” Clinton has since uttered those difficult words, but it was like pulling teeth on a blind donkey on…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    North Korean War Effects

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On June 25 1950 North Korea invaded South Korea igniting the second major conflict on the Asian continent in five years. The Korean War was a result of many ripple effects that involved World War II and the democracy of the United States and the communism of the Russian country. This thus became a representation war between two distinct ideals from two powerful nations to assert their influences in strategic regions. The Immediate result, was of the North Korea trespassing over the 38 parallel border dividing South Korea established by the US and Russia. The partition of Korea was decided on a conference that involved the Allies in 1945, named Potsdam conference.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays