Norman Naimark's Genocides Analysis

Good Essays
Norman Naimark argues in Stalin’s Genocides that the dekulakization, the Holodomor, attacks on enemy nationalities, and the purges of 1937-38 purges should all be classified as the “crime of crimes”: genocide. Currently the four events are simply viewed as massacres or mass killings of a gargantuan scale. He goes further to assert that it was Stalin alone who facilitated and enabled these genocides to occur. By reclassifying them as genocide, Naimark hopes that Stalin’s crimes will finally get the recognition and proper classification that they deserve. The text focuses on these four key examples to prove this point, however, Naimark also insists that the four cases should be seen collectively as one interrelated genocide under the reign of …show more content…
This possibly one of the more convincing examples of genocide personally, as it clearly targeted a national group. The Soviet government killed millions of Ukrainian peasants by denying them aid, the ability to seek food elsewhere, and refused to relax restrictions until the damage was done. One key troubling point in this chapter was when Naimark admits that “there is not a lot of evidence that Stalin himself ordered the Ukrainian killer famine” as this hurts Naimarks key thesis that Stalin was the enabling agent for these genocides. I can believe however, that there can be no doubt that his policies and purposeful inaction were complicit scale of death and suffering during the …show more content…
Admittedly I knew the premise of the Great Purge before reading Naimark’s work, so I was slightly confused as to how the deaths of a wide spectrum of people from the top of government office to the lowest peasant accused of “Trotskyism” could be considered a genocide. Naimark makes a credible argument that it could be considered a political holocaust because of the sheer scale of the killings. Not only did Stalin wantonly kill those he perceived as a potential threat, he also killed their spouses and families. The total death toll reached over 700,000 people. These people were grouped by Stalin as being political opponents, thus satisfying Naimark’s definition of a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Both Stalin and Hitler wanted to rid their countries of undesirable people. Stalin did this before Hitler, and used intentional famine to starve people to death. Like myself, the average person, or American at least, does not know this happened. The Holocaust is typically viewed as a German phenomenon, without any reference to Stalin participating in his own murderous rampage during and even before World War II broke out. Hitler also used a policy of starvation to kill people off.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Rwanda Genocide

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Holocaust was one of the biggest genocides there are more genocides that have taken place and have damaged human populations. Genocide is a huge matter, by informing oneself the possibility of reliving history is slim to none. The Rwandan genocide is one of many genocides. It was a really short genocide, but in those one hundred days one million lives were taken. A population of Tutsi people was almost wiped out because the Hutu extremist took their hatred out on them and caused them so much damage.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    they were fighting for limited resources and territory.Both groups,Nazi and Tutsis, also wanted to superior for political purposes. In the Nazi death camps most of their actions for just out of sheer hatred and dominance over the Jews. Dehumanization is a key element in genocide.This rang true for true for the Rwandan genocide and the Holocaust, proven by the treatment of the oppressed groups and the obliteration of their entire race. Entire groups were virtually wiped out so the suppressors (Nazi or Tutsis) could benefit because they were thought to be more worthy. They were talked down upon, stolen from and mercilessly murdered, without a sense of rue because the idea of individuality and identity was ignored.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hintjens compares the Rwandan genocide of the Jews in Nazi Germany since it was a planned out mass killing of a hated minority. The genocide organized by both private and public sectors, which ensure “its subsequent implementation through the participation of most Rwandan people” that preceded the mistreatment of Tutsi (Hintjens, 244). The mass killing was throughout in a “strong sense of secrecy and false air of normality served to disarm many victims of this genocide (Hintjens, 245) making it hard for the victims to actually see what awaited. When the genocide began many Rwandans were taken by surprise, including the international community. Tutsi denies the fact that their Hutu acquaintance would one day turn against them due to their tribal history.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stanley Milgram, author of “The Perils of Obedience,” conducted an experiment that could help explain the Nazis, in their mind, were merely following orders and doing a job. In contrast with humanist Milgram points out most conservative thinking philosophers believe the core of society is compromised by disobedience (Milgram 692). The reason the Holocaust occurred was because the Germans thought all the Jews were evil and needed to die. During Hitler’s eight year reign of power millions of men, women, and children, most of Jewish descent were killed in concentration camps. Hitler issued directives, and the Germans obeyed his authority.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They collaborated with the anti-semitic work because their dictator, Hitler, told them to. Even though the Holocaust was a genocide, the Holocaust was also a democide because government officials murdered millions of…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Armenian Genocide has comparable qualities to the Holocaust such as tactics used to murder people, motives for hating other groups, and the extreme amount of humans killed. The Armenian genocide was not as large of a genocide as the Holocaust, but the revolting ideas connected. These genocides stand as horrific experiences. People living in the worst conditions, were starving, cold, and hungry. First, the Germans and the Ottoman Turks both took away the rights of religion to the other group.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They attempted to help all the people of Germany that fit into the classification that Hitler wanted to get rid of but were too late,Hitler had already committed countless murders. The U.S. convicted Adolf of mass murder, but didn 't get to him so Earle Rice Jr. states in his book by writing, " Hitler 's fleeing to the Alps would divert the soviet troop and allow some two million Berliners to leave the city and escape having to fight the soviets in the streets." (Rice 154) Which would lead to the U.S. in hunting him down. As fate has it, Hitler got his justice. Hitler later ended up losing his life to his own hands.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The holocaust is considered a travesty by all who have heard the tales of many who survived the event, sadly 12 million weren’t as lucky. Genocide is the systematic elimination of a group of people based of some quality that they share. The holocaust is a more well known example of this act which causes more damage than you’d imagine. Genocide has lethal effects on a culture,primarily the victims and perpetrators.There have been documented accounts of the steps that lead to a genocide.This is why we need to educate people in genocide prevention to fight against mass murder. The act of Genocide is much more dangerous than many people think as Stephen Levine stated during his article on genocide’s affect on society as whole during and…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Genocide is one of the many things today that is so hard to prevent. The word genocide comes from the Greek word geno-, meaning race or tribe, and from the Latin word -cide, meaning killing. The genocides range from the Armenian genocide, the genocide in Darfur, in Rwanda, the Holocaust, and so much more. Raphael Lemkin, the person who came up with the word genocide, came up with it because he wanted to describe Nazi policies of systematic murders and the other crimes against humanity. Genocide occurs because of the people who think it is okay to kill off an entire group that is different than theirs.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays