Normal Accidents

Improved Essays
How Experts Conceive the Risks Related to the Nuclear Energy Plants
The expert in the field of nuclear energy has always argued that the benefits associated cannot even be comparable with limited risk in the nuclear plant. The specialists in this area conceive that the risk involves in the nuclear power plant is of little concern if all the necessary risk measures are put into place (Nuclear Energy Agency, 7). Under the few situation in which nuclear energy power have resulted in been catastrophic, the expert has explained that they are few incidences that accidence occur, and that should be expected any why. In his book, Normal Accidents, Charles Perrow described how real the risk associated with the nuclear energy plant are and also outlined few standard accidence that were expected (Perrow, 45).
…show more content…
The experts find limited risk in the case of the nuclear energy plant. Among the risk that they find as of concern includes the involuntary nature of the technology used in the nuclear plant. They find it to be risky to use a technology that imposes limited risk to the member of the public without they concern (Sjöberg, 742). They also find the concept of nuclear energy been hard to be understood by many in the society as risky. Additional they also perceive some level of riskiness in nuclear danger as it cannot be sensed by human if it can occur, the radiation cannot be seen, heard, felt, tasted or smelled.
Another risk that the experts perceive in the setting up of nuclear energy includes little knowledge to those that many be affected. Not only is the concept of nuclear power had to understand, but they is
AuthorLastName5
also still little know-how among many people in the society, hence it a risk of concern to experts knowing that people have limited knowledge of it. Other fear that expert's shows include dread matter if an accident occurs, hard to avoid in case of an accident, and irreversible effects (Sjöberg,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The failure to address the safety mechanism flaws and properly train technicians have made citizen believe that nuclear power is the most dangerous although “statistics show that nuclear power has killed by far the fewest number of per terawatt hour of any type of power”…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even After Fukushima” by William Tucker portrays that all energy technologies have risks and that the world needs to use nuclear technology to help maintain the standard of living. For example, the natural gas explosion in Cleveland, the coal mining in china, and the hydroelectric dam collapse in Japan are all examples of technology accidents. Tucker implies that nuclear power does have some risks but it is still one of the best sources of energy. Uranium fuel rods cam sit in a reactor core for up to five years and power a city close to the size of San Francisco. Nuclear reactors can last quite a long time before they need to be refilled and can supply to a big chunk of the world with very little…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    TMI Accidents

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition to the safety risks associated with nuclear…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, he is inaccurate because in “The Fatal Flaws of Nuclear Power”, it discusses about the additional expenses of nuclear power since “Other aspects of nuclear power, such as the pollution from uranium mining, risks from nuclear weapons proliferation, dangers of reactor accidents, and the legacy of radioactive waste, are further hidden costs.” This demonstrates that constructing a nuclear reactor is highly priced, along with numerous other requirements that necessitate funds. Additionally, nuclear power generates harmful risks towards humans. Based on…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Topic: Nuclear Energy Thesis: While nuclear energy has many benefits, the negative implications must be considered. " Fukushima's Radioactive Water Leak: What You Should Know. "…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both the progress and energy independence frame promote nuclear power with the former presenting it as essential and beneficial, particularly in terms of technological and economic advancement, and the latter promoting it as a solution to dependence on foreign sources of energy. Counter to these are another five frames that criticise the use of nuclear power. Soft paths view it as environmentally hazardous, promoting greener energy, lifestyle changes and conservation as solutions while runaway is extremely negative yet resigned to its use. The no public accountability frame criticises regulation and both commercial and government management of the energy source while the not cost effective frame questions the economic benefit, particularly in comparison to the risks involved. Finally, the devil’s bargain frame presents nuclear power as a dilemma, recognising the benefits but believing there will ultimately be a huge price to pay.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The most debated topic of nuclear power is the question: “Is nuclear power ethical?”. There are a number of areas to consider when looking at this. First one must must look at the risk to cost ratio and see if the benefits of nuclear power outweigh the risks. Secondly one must must look briefly at the environmentally effects caused by the generation of nuclear power. Lastly one must must look at the potential effects on future generations.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All sources except for “Thorium”, Ian Schultz’s article and the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency conclude that nuclear energy is reliable. The sources that do not state this deal with other aspects concerning nuclear energy such as cost and fuel. Another trend is the low cost of nuclear energy after the initial build of the plant, which is concluded by every source, but “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, “Unmatched Reliability” and “CO2 emission of electricity from nuclear power stations”. Finally, all sources but “Thorium”, the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ian Schultz’s report, “Unmatched Reliability” and “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, discuss the low pollution of nuclear energy which is the last key point of my essay. • All of the sources are credible sources, because they are relevant, produced recently and are either organizations, education sites or databases.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Nuclear Energy Ferguson, Charles D. Nuclear Energy: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford UP, 2011. In this book Charles D. Ferguson, president of the Federation of American Scientists, writes about how nuclear energy is formed, the health risks it can cause, and the cost of nuclear energy plants. He gives the three sources to create nuclear energy: fission, fusion, and radioactive decay.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No matter how small the probability, safety concerns with nuclear power plants pose a real and finite danger. The purpose of a nuclear power plant is to produce electricity for supporting increases in consumption of other electrical uses like power and other things. In spite of its many benefits, nuclear power often falls under fire because of the many disadvantages it brings. After the uranium splits to generate heat, the resulting byproducts are radioactive, which means they need to be removed in a safe way. Even though power plants have undergone recycling efforts of this waste product in recent years, storing the byproduct can lead to contamination through various containment failures.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It has been almost 70 years since the end of World War II. Today, nuclear power is used in everywhere, and it has become a very familiar thing to people. It is used in nuclear power plants, cancer treatments, radiocarbon dating for research and investigation purpose, and even in every household like smoke detectors. It has been contributing greatly to the modern society, and made people’s life better. However, its fast development is inseparable from the Manhattan Project in the World War II and the cruel results of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Topic: Atomic Bomb: Composition, Explosion By Chandra Goyal (IPM2013032) By Shilpika Ganeriwala (IPM2013085) Introduction Every nation requires the advancement of energy policy as an act which balances. A country’s decision regarding inclusion of nuclear energy in the country’s portfolio can be more complicated because nuclear needs an industry and regulatory infrastructure to ensure the safety, the ongoing access to the global nuclear trade with the help of treaties and cooperation agreements, a significant amount of capital for the construction of new plant and public support for the use of technology peacefully.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The documentary that was first shown in 2013 and is approximately 83 minutes long, does an excellent job of creating a debate about the perception of nuclear energy in challenging global climate change during the 21st century. This documentary film's main argument is that nuclear power, yet contradicted by many environmentalists, is a relatively safe and harmless source of energy if compared to other energy sources and can counteract…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year our planet comes into contact with multiple large scale pollution disasters which continue to lead us to our inevitable demise if we don’t change something. Right now, our lives are fueled mostly by Coal, and Oil which create large disasters. Pollutants from these disasters flood into our oceans killing millions of fish, and other sea creatures. The pollutants also get into our air which cause smog in many cities, which can lead to death amongst thousands of small children. The time is now to switch to an alternate source of electricity that is required to save our planet.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays