Marriage Roles In A Doll's House By Henrik Ibsen

Superior Essays
In modern society, it is believed that a marriage is now more equal than before because of the increase in opportunities that women have in modern times. Women now have more economic freedom and are not just confined to the house. Women can get jobs and can discuss their problems openly in society. In addition, they are not confined to just one role in society and are allowed to choose whether they want to go down the path of motherhood. In the nineteenth century, marriage roles had been perceived as unequal because of how constricted a woman was in the eyes of society. At that time, women did not have monetary freedom, which meant that they did not have power in their lives. Therefore, women were only expected to bear children since they did not have the necessary power to desire a different life. They did not have the choice of …show more content…
When Torvald says this to Nora, he is not giving Nora the option of becoming something other than a mother or a wife. Torvald believes that Nora cannot be something other than those two options while he has the power to explore his options. This shows the imbalance within the marriage because Torvald does not need to give his all to his family while Nora is being forced to do this. Another example of patriarchal power is when Torvald states how Nora does not consider what people will say if she were to leave her home. This is another example of patriarchal power because of how it is believed that a woman 's place is at home, which is a social norm. It shows the imbalanced marriage because Nora’s actions are being defined by a society that is ruled by men. If a man were to leave his wife and family, most would not think much of this because it would be perceived as acceptable and normal if it were to happen. However, a woman leaving her family is deemed bad and wrong because it “undermined and threatened the stability of society”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Women were still limited in their rights and education at the start of the 19th century. When the French adopted a constitution in 1791 it gave women more power in divorce and inheriting property, but they still were not allowed to vote or hold a public office. Education was also more readily available for women, but it was intended to shape women into the “ideal wife”, so they focused on activities that were appropriate for women, like embroidery and music. The more academic pursuits were left to the intellectually superior gender. When looking for a husband, women were expected to “marry up” because many people believed that this was the only way for a woman to be successful.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They were also to be controlled by men and simple minded. During this time housewives had a higher social status than working women like Mrs. Linde, who were thought to be miserably unhappy. In the beginning of the play Nora insisted that she had never been so happy and in love, that married life couldn’t be any better and her husband absolutely adored her. She had a bouncy and playful attitude but there were some things that she was not blind to, like how her looks would soon fade and he may not like her as much. It wasn’t until her husband did not agree to take the blame for her that she finally realized that her father and husband had been treating her like a toy doll.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nora seems to be entrapped in the panopticon of patriarchy. The panoptic nature of societal power makes women’s social position more vulnerable to be effected by patriarchy. Let me first explain, briefly, Michel Foucault’s concept of Pantopticism: Foucault expounds the concept of Omniscient power governing our society by elaborating the concept of panopticon. He explains how panoptican gives power over people's minds through architecture and how behavior is modified.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “During the course of the twentieth century, marriage in America was in effect redefined as a relationship for personal self-fulfillment.” “The contemporary view of marriage as an emotional, perhaps lasting bond, between two independent individuals is shaping our law and arguably has become the predominant American opinion on the purpose of marriage.” The feminist movement and, in general, supporters of personal autonomy are two groups behind the redefinition of marriage. Feminists took issue with the consent of women when it comes to marriage. “Feminist critics of marriage believe that the consent of women and the actions of wives and mothers within marriage are subtly shaped by ‘patriarchy’ in what they take to be our male-dominated society.”…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torvald held the most power in the relationship. However, Nora holds some influence over her husband. She uses her influence to derive meaning and autonomy in her life. She uses her power to influence her husband’s bank policy. He takes her ideas and implements some of…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main character, Nora, experiences this suppression and frees herself from her doll like lifestyle. Nora is an example of feminist progression in the 1800s. In the first act of the play, Nora and her husband, Torvald Helmer, seem happily…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the book, Nora is unable to fulfill her desires and is living under Torvald’s dominancy. These occurrences in the book show us the different roles and expectations of women and men in our world. If any person doesn’t follow their socially-constructed gender roles, they are judged and shamed by society.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Doll House During 1870’s, the role of women in marriage was a very controversial theme because there was a belief that women were supposed to follow certain duties with her husband and family; furthermore, women did not have many possibilities to depend on themselves, and they utterly depended on men. Henrik Ibsen wrote the play called “A Doll House”, which is a critic toward the models and standards of marriage during this time, and its protagonist, Nora Helmer, represents the situation of many women at this time. Women had to stick with whatever their husband gave them, and they had to accept the treatment that their husband gave them.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nora, the main character and wife in the play, deviated from society’s expectations. This essay will explore the contrast of women of Nora’s time and women today. Today, women are more likely to voice concern about the marriage and finances, commonly a joint effort. In the early 1900’s men were the only ones able to make financial decisions and ultimately ran the household.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Equality of Men and Women American women in society were expected to follow one path for decades, a path to get married in an early age, quickly start a family, and devote their lives to home making. Judy Brady, in her 1972 classic short essay “Why I Want A Wife,” clarifies some of the common stereotypes that a typical married woman had to face in the 1970s: “I want a wife who will take care of my physical needs. I want a wife who will keep my house clean” (1). She argues that women are nearly powerless when it comes to making their own decisions and following their own dreams.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He sees her as nonthreatening and too naïve to handle real world issues. For example, Torvald uses phrases such as “The child should have her way,” (49) in order to demean her and to make her ideas seem unimportant. Torvald’s passive way of viewing Nora can relate to the fact that society treats the issue of gender inequality as something that can be put aside and solved later. However, just as children need to be taken care of, so do these issues. In many cases, Torvald brushes off Nora’s opinions by calling her hysterical whenever she tries to stand up for herself or provide any input.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    While Nora’s actions theoretically would have been frowned upon, abandoning her children and husband, lying and cheating her way through the justice system, but Ibsen provides a deeper, analytical view into the root of the problem and Nora comes out the true victim and is not to be shamed. Nora represents a modern-day woman, though in the late 1800’s her actions were not so fairly understood by both genders. In Shannon Cron’s commentary on Ibsen’s play, she indicates that even in a society charged with double standards and blatant bias, Nora was a heroine for misunderstood women, she…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torvald 's patronizing mindset was not really unusual for men during the Victorian era. He asserts his dominance over Nora verbally in a nonchalant manner by giving her nicknames. He is a man who is more worried about his reputation rather than his wife 's overall wellbeing. Furthermore, Nora 's and Torvald 's marriage on the outside may appear to be the perfect relationship, but as the play progresses forward, she begins to realize that her marriage is not as authentic as it appears to be. Torvald sees Nora 's role as being the subservient and perfect wife, he presented her to…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Henrik Ibsen was a major 19-century playwright, theater, director and poet. Often referred as “The father of realism” and founder of modernism in the theater. People called him the “next” Shakespeare. He was born on March 20, 1828 in Skein, Norway. His parents’ were Knud Ibsen and Marichen Altenburg.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are major opposing moral views between characters in Henrik Ibsen 's dramatic play A Doll 's House. One moral trail leads to the conclusion that once someone commits a bad deed, there is no saving them; that person is now a low-life degenerate with no redemption in sight. The other side falls under a much more sympathetic view. They believe that the goodness of a person, whether it comes from who they once were, or who they are now, can help them overcome their mistakes and become truly good again. If brought to trial, through Torvald 's close-minded views on how people are, the sympathy of Krogstad 's children, Ms. Linde 's views on Krogstad 's character, and the words of Krogstad himself, the accusation of Krogstad 's moral degeneracy…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays