Nonviolent Tension Definition

Improved Essays
The foundation of a free society, as stated in the Declaration of Independence, is the understanding that all humans are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” This idea is the only true motivation for a society in which the government operates for the protection of its citizens’ freedoms; by protecting and valuing freedom, one admits that man has innate rights and freedoms to protect. This understanding also admits to the existence of a system of justice outside human law, since man’s natural rights, rather than law, ensure him his freedoms. Therefore, in a free society in which laws can be unjust, it is a natural consequence that its citizens should act in the role of, as Thoreau states in Civil Disobedience, “men first and subjects afterward,” meaning that they follow their conscience in judging what is just, and, if a law unjustly denies man what he deserves as a human being, then he must disobey that law. Despite this clear theoretical case of civil disobedience, many argue its detrimental effects on society for two reasons: it is unnecessary when protestors could simply negotiate legally, and it encourages disrespect …show more content…
termed “constructive, nonviolent tension” in “Letter From a Birmingham Jail.” When one citizen or a group of citizens peacefully disobeys the law and accepts punishment without resistance, it brings to public attention the injustice of certain laws. This civil disobedience makes the average person aware of the unjust laws within their government and creates a tension that moves society towards social and legal change away from injustice. Although many argue that this change would be more effectively accomplished through legal negotiation, often negotiation is not enough. In the case of the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s, for example, the legal successes could not have happened without the pressure put on the legislators by public

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Government is a system of legislators that act on the part of the people, to actively promote a healthy and interactive community - or at least that is what the concept of government was originally. However, government has evolved through those who control it, and oftentimes the role of the government in civilian life is viewed negatively by the governed. Those governed do not always agree with how the system is run, which has created friction between the two parties. Acts of rebellion are often violent, but peaceful protests also are led in order to bring attention to issues, and enact change. “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”, an essay by Henry David Thoreau, expresses his thoughts on the government and how citizens should respond to governmental issues.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The lasting impact of the Stonewall Riots originates from ideals in the Transcendentalist era. Transcendentalism was an American movement in both philosophy and literature, lasting from 1836 to 1860. Beginning as a movement for reform in the Unitarian Church, it branched off from William Ellery Channing's’ views of an “indwelling God and the significance of intuitive thought” (American Transcendentalism by Donna M. Campbell). Transcendentalism was a belief system that showed the significance of every individual, and valued self reliance along with openness. Ralph Waldo Emerson was a key author during this movement, and is considered the father of Transcendentalism.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Henry David Thoreau expresses his aim in writing his “Resistance to Civil Disobedience” was to advocate protesting the government in nonviolent mannerisms. He considers that not taking initiation and solely discuss abolishing evil, is comparable to inciting it. He encourages this by evoking that “All men recognize...the right to resist, the government , when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and endurable. But almost all say that such is not the case now.” (Thoreau).…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author, King, displayed a model of civil disobedience throughout the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” (King). Dr. King knew it was his responsibility to change unjust laws (King). Dr. King nonviolent civil disobedient approach was “to create a crisis and establish [tension] to force [the] community to negotiate (Bass 122). Dr. King’s steps toward creating tension was to help bring together brotherhood and justice in the American society. Dr. King implies that proceeding without tension is going to leave man in “the dark depths of prejudice and racism” (King).…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience” discusses why man should resist the oppressive government and the evil inflicted upon him in the form of law. He illustrates that this evil will never cease to exist as long as man lets it, so the only way to stop the it is to disobey, resist, and rebel in order to bring a change to the government. Thoreau advocates for the idea of rebellion by saying, “They think that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse than the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that the remedy is worse than the evil” (2). The government's solution for revolution is to punish those who oppose them with incarceration and/or violence, which is worse than the consequence they receive if they just…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As we take a look at the history of the United States, impacting a free society has not been easy. There have been many laws that have not treated everyone fairly. In order to impact a free society, many had to undergo civil disobedience in order to impact the free society that we live in today. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. Without civil disobedience, it would have been almost impossible to make change in our society.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    " The government is best which governs least” (Thoreau 76), Or is it? Should the American people be free to disobey laws they consider unjust? Thoreau talks about these issues in his essay, Civil Disobedience.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society should disobey unjust laws and obey the just laws with sound morality to help improve people's lives. Likewise, Thoreau’s take on civil disobedience follows the idea of opposition to unjust law as a moral duty.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anyone can recognize when a law is unjust - but can they be brave enough to face the consequences if they choose to protest that law? Should they? Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience” critiques that citizens must protest a law that is unjust, and his own experiences and methods for protest, and Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” where he speaks of his approach to protesting against unjust laws, even if it lands him in jail. Both philosophers regarding on their answers on this question shows that they are both willing to protest and face the consequences for it, but they differ in their ideas of solutions. King’s perspective on breaking unjust laws is that it is necessary to do it to give an oppressed group the opportunity…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Vs Mlk

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout American history, more often than not, our attention is drawn to the more violent attempts at making change. While some of these brutal attempts at liberation have come to be successful, violence is certainly not something we should have to resort to in order to see eye-to-eye. In the past, plenty of leaders have discovered the effect of non-violent protest, disobeying laws to prove a point. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. are two of plenty people who share this philosophy, though they are greatly credited with paving the way for this mentality. Within their own pieces, “Civil Disobedience” (penned by Thoreau) and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” (by MLK), they share many of the same techniques to further prove their…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson said, “Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude.” Throughout history, civil disobedience has been practiced and debated. Many civil rights activists and groups have protested various rights and laws they view as unfair or unjust. Other more pro-government organizations and people take a stand against disobeying laws made by the government. While these two opposing sides have both good and bad arguments for their positions, the question as to whether a Christian should commit an act of civil disobedience adds another dimension to the debate.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Thoreau declares, “The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right” (Ogunye). He ostensibly acknowledges no authority other than that of his own moral sense. In this essay, civil disobedience will be defined as the unwillingness to obey civil laws in an attempt to prompt change in governmental law or procedure, demonstrated by the use of nonviolent methods. The matter in question, then, is whether such civil disobedience is justified in a democratic society. The value of this essay’s argument is fairness; that is, defending human rights and granting each his or her due.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individual’s Moral Obligation to stand for what is Right In “Civil Disobedience” by Thoreau asserts that government seldom shows itself sufficient and that it often derives its power from the majority; who are its subjects. Furthermore, Thoreau underscores that the state, just as corporates have no conscience, but through its citizens, can be viewed as conscientious or reckless. Consequently, it is up to the people to practice conscience when endeavoring into their activities.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert O’Connor Concord High School New Hampshire Like many things in life, civil disobedience, is all a matter of perspective. Whether it be the Great Muhammad Ali peacefully opposing his selection for the draft or Rosa Parks literally sitting down instead of standing up for what is right on a bus ride home, each and every case of civil disobedience has its ups and downs. Though, when talking about basic human rights, there is no room to be neutral, and that is why peaceful resistance to laws most certainly impacts a society positively. From an optimistic perspective, everything will be alright in the end. Despite Ali’s…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays