Pros And Cons Of Nonviolent Drug Offenders

Improved Essays
President Barack Obama states that "it just doesn 't make sense to require a nonviolent drug offender to serve 20 years, or in some cases, life, in prison.” After granting pardons to over 58 nonviolent criminal offenders, he came to this conclusion. Obama makes a very good point here, why are we sentencing nonviolent offenders greater lengths than murders or rapists? The truth, America is caught up in the war on drugs. This results in failure to solve the real, bigger issue at hand. Instead of neglecting these people, we must exercise our power to help them become active members of society again. We have numerous rehabilitation programs that the Government doesn 't recognize as legitimate resources. Instead of utilizing these programs, the …show more content…
Of course, non violent drug offenders still deserve to serve their time; however, how much is enough? The Bureau of Justice defines “nonviolent crimes as property, drug, and public order offenses which do not involve a threat of harm or an actual attack upon a victim.” These are people who have an opportunity to better themselves, and our economy. If they become working members of society, it’s beneficial for America as a whole. It’s completely unethical and illogical that nonviolent drug offenders serve the same sentences of those committing violent and severe crimes due to the cost, defiance of alternatives, and irrational ideology. Due to the cost alone, we must reassess our harsh policy on nonviolent drug charges. America is roughly $19 Trillion in debt; however, we still spend ludicrous amounts on our prison system. These are the people that will attribute to our economy, once healthy. They …show more content…
Society fails to realize that addicts need help in order to become themselves again. Addiction is an illness, and while the inmate chose that road, America has the power to help them off it. Hoping they will become clean in the prison system isn’t solving the problem. It is almost if we are just wiping our problems under a rug, hoping they will fix themselves. Putting addicts in the prison system, without proper treatment, creates a surefire way to have them end up back in prison. I know firsthand, living with an addict guides my argument. Learning my once loving, caring mother was an addict crushed me. I actually wished she had gone to jail; however, she found rehab. Seeing my once alcoholic mother, back to her caring loving self shows me how powerful rehab can be. It truly works. Finding rehab helped her, which uplifted me and my family. So, multiple people may benefit from rehab; the user, as well as families will find peace. This creates a domino effect, leading to an increase of happiness within our society. Courses such as “HOPE programs, function like 24/7 programs for methamphetamine users. Participants are called each day and asked to come in for a drug test on random days. Failure to show up or a failed tests result in short jail stays” (Hult). This is where America must put the focus. Our efforts must be on helping these people, not neglecting them. It is America 's

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The prison population has skyrocketed from 357,292 in 1970 to 2,306,200 in 2014 thanks to the war on drugs and war on people who use them. These numbers have only started to decrease in recent years because Americans had to learn the hard way that putting drug addicts into prison with other drug addicts and drugs dealers instead of rehab and counseling to treat their addiction was not an effective way to stop drug usage and sales. Of course this was never intended to stop drugs. It was intended to fill prisons because of companies like the CCA who make money off of having people in their prisons. Other companies like Victoria’s Secret make money off of prisoner’s labor.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supplying drug treatment for all American would cost money, but would cause more success for fighting drugs then locking up millions of people (Alexander, p 233, 2010). Locking up drug users and giving them sentences that will remain on their records only prevents them from finding a good job and contributing to society. However, placing them in drug treatment centers would filter through the real heavy drug users and those who are willing to get better and make a change. In the end this would save money and do more against drugs then locking all offenders up would do. An additional solution that may be successful is revoking financial incentives given to police for high amounts of drug arrest, usually among African Americans (Alexander, p 232, 2010).…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Treatment vs. Incarceration for Opioid Abuse There are more than 15 million Americans that suffer from opioid abuse disorder (WHO,2014). This paper looks at treatment options verses incarceration. Out of the 2 million people in federal and state prison more than one-quarter of them suffer from drug abuse (Common Sense for Drug Policy, 2016). What is more astonishing is that most of them do not receive the treatment they need to recover from their opiate addiction.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the last few decades, the U.S. population of incarcerated citizens exploded from around 300,000 to more than 2 million, with drug convictions accounting for a majority of the increase. The War on Drugs functions more realistically as…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crime In Prison

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, although crime has decreased, drug use has not decreased, and imprisonment rates are growing more drastic. Between 1993 and 1996, serious crime decreased by 5% and adult arrests increased by 12%, but adult arrests for serious crime only increased by 3%; in contrast, arrests for less serious crimes, like drug possession, grew by 14% (Cunniff 9). Yet despite the lack of impact of anti-drug programs, the government continues to take the same approach. Even despite the increase in prison populations, there are little to no regulations of prison populations (Schlanger 199). Clearly, the federal government must discontinue the emphasis on drug sentences and begin to put more effort into decreasing prison populations.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In 2005 four out of five drug arrests were for possession of minor drugs, and one out of five were for actual sales… [with] most people in state prison for drug offenses having no history of violence or significant selling activity” (Alexander, p. 60). If the prison system was designed to keep out the most dangerous and worst kind of people behind bars, it shouldn’t be a fact that the majority of those in jail are nonviolent offenders of…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As many of you already know the United States has the highest percentage of its population behind bars compared to any other country. This may be related to the fact that a majority of petty crimes require mandatory sentencing. Politicians such as District Attorney Dan Conley believe that mandatory sentencing is an efficient way to protect the population from corrupt individuals as well as decreasing crime rates. However, housing all of these individuals is not cheap, the funding for this endeavor is taken directly from the taxes all of us have to pay. While I agree that petty crime offenders should compensate in some way for their crimes, further destroying their lives is not the answer.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Out of all the nations, America has the largest incarceration rates in the world. How can America justify its methods of punishment when there are plenty of non-violent offenders residing in jails or prisons? From establishing the war on drugs, minimum sentencing laws, or sentence enhancements, America still has much to do to lower its incarceration rate. Can the United States successfully argue that punishing a non-violent drug offender with life without parole is fitting? The epidemic of mass incarceration within America speaks volumes as there is a continued pattern of imprisoning than…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lsd Pros And Cons

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    United States has the world largest prison populations Most of the inmates are not rapist murders or robbers but are drug addicts and sellers. Every year thousands of inmates are sentence to long prison terms for a variety of drug crimes. Most of the inmates are getting mandatory sentences because of laws that been put in place to curtail the use of drugs but they are not working and more and more people are going to prison for long term. The sale of illegal drugs in the US is extremely lucrative, earning an estimated $60billion and involving 16 million or more customers each year. In 1999, Americans spent an estimated $36 billion on cocaine, $11 billion on heroin, $10 billion on marijuana, $6 billion on methamphetamines, and $3 billion on…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Satire On Drugs

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the United States something as simple as a drug possession charge can get you into serious trouble, with some offenses even marked as felonies. (Controlled Substances Act, 2014) This is a ludicrous idea, drug crimes are usually victimless, restricting drug usage violates basic human rights, and even tobacco and alcohol are legal. In addition to these things, putting drug charges on a person’s criminal record, or sending someone to jail on drug charges pushes more people to a life of crime. For these reasons, I believe that people should not be punished for using drugs.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AFFIRMATIVE I affirm: Resolved: The abuse of illegal drugs ought to be treated as a matter of public health, not of criminal justice. I define the following key terms: Treated- to act or behave toward (a person) in some specified way to consider or regard in a specified way, and deal with accordingly: 2. to consider or regard in a specified way, and deal with accordingly 3.to deal with (a disease, patient, etc.) in order to relieve or cure.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cost of treatment as opposed to incarceration is much less (Me). Sadly, some people cannot afford treatment. If treatment does not work or the addict is not taking it seriously then and only then should jail be the solution. There has to be some form of pressure to stop. A three-strike rule would work diligently.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During a time when the federal government has trillions in debt, it seems unethical and unintelligent to ignore the benefits and cost savings of helping people get the treatment they need rather than worsening everyone’s problems with incarceration. Several states have already taken considerable steps to divert people convicted of low-level drug offenses to treatment and other services. The California Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (SACPA) diverts people convicted of non-violent, drug-related crimes to community-based treatment, education, or training and probation. A fiscal evaluation estimated that for every $1 allocated to fund this program, $2.50 was saved. The resulting net savings to the state and local governments amounted to a staggering $173.3 million per year in avoided criminal justice costs, reduced trial court costs, and reduced arrest rates of participants.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While there is wide consensus that tougher penalties are necessary and appropriate for those convicted of serious violent or sex offenses, many policymakers are questioning the need for long prison terms for people convicted of less serious crimes such as nonviolent drug offenses. Some of these provisions were reversed during the fiscal crisis earlier this decade, resulting in severe prison overcrowding. States are also presented with a growing number of elderly and chronically ill prisoners whose ongoing care requires significant resources. To address these issues, officials have added or modified the laws and policies that determine the amount of time people spend in prison. These changes have the potential to lower prison populations, allowing states to close facilities and reduce corrections expenses in the longer term (Scott-Hayward,…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Funding of Rehabilitation Programs in the Federal Prison System of America and Their Effect on Prisoners Prison rehabilitation can be defined as the re-integration into society of a person who has been convicted of crime, to counter habitual offending, also known as criminal recidivism. (Rehabilitation Center., n.d.) These rehabilitation programs can take the form of educational, artistic, recreational and drug abuse programs. Many prisons in the U.S. don’t fund a substantial quality of rehabilitation programs even though they have proven to be highly effective in reintegrating prisoners to the outside world; seen through a lowered recidivism rate in those prisons that have implemented them.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays