Non Violence Vs Nonviolence

Improved Essays
We live in a world today where we are surrounded by violence. It seems to me that violence has increased within the last few years due to cultural and religious differences. Although violence has increased, has it really been effective? In my eyes, violence does nothing but hurt others. Instead, I believe that nonviolence is more effective. Like once said by the very influential Mahatma Gandhi, “Nonviolence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.” His quote is absolutely true, nonviolence is much more powerful than violence. Violence may be effective in the short run, but it does not leave the lasting effect that nonviolence does.
What causes
…show more content…
As a person who has always lived in a place where my religion and ethnicity has been the minority, this topic is very relatable to me. There have been times when I have been made fun of and bullied due to my appearance and beliefs. Those experiences were some of the hardest moments of my life, and it has taught me to help others who are in situations like mine, and to have no tolerance towards people making fun of others. If legal limits were put in, many situations like bullying at schools would be reduced. Many may say that legal limits would limit our freedom of speech, but it does not mean that we should just say everything that comes to our minds. We should not overuse our right ot freedom of speech for immoral purposes, but rather for good. It is true that we can say what we want, but if it is hurtful or discriminatory to other, it should not be …show more content…
In the Charlie Hebdo shooting, the gunmen should not have violence in defense of their Islamic religion. All the violence did was cause chaos and left 11 people dead. The offended gunmen should have taken a nonviolent approach and should have conforted the newspaper company about not publishing anything discriminatory against their religion, formed a protest, or many different other nonviolence approaches. Violence in defense of religion should never justified. Instead of helping the situation, it only leads to a never ending vicious cycle.People cannot just kill or hurt people because they believe they are right. Just like another famous quote by Gandhi, “An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.” If we all hurt each other, in the end, all of us will be hurt. Instead we must help each other and show others that resisting the temptation of violence is the best route to take. It all begins with us; we must show others to resist violence, so they will follow

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When the Towers Fell, We Took a Stand In a recent Ted talk presentation, executive director of the Albert Einstein Institution, Jamila Raqib, discusses how she knows the secret on how to resolve conflict in a non-violent technique. She goes on to state how there are over one hundred techniques of non-violent actions that can be taken to resolve harsh issues instead of using violence. Although I understand what she is saying and agree to a certain extent, I think living during the time of a terrorist attack has made me realize there are certain circumstances that can only be handled with violence. If we as a country did not result to violence and retaliate against Bin Laden, our country would have lived in constant fear, there would have been more attacks organized by him, and other terrorists from other locations would have seen our country as weak and possibly set forth plans to attack us also.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third paragraph inquires about beneficial aspects of nonviolence, claiming that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence”. It also contributes by stating, “nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive”, allowing for a peaceful and innocent reputation to help achieve success within a conflict. Contrarily, paragraph four explains the detrimental effects of pure rapid violence. Creating animosity and pain, futile violence results in “escalated” issues with “many injuries”, “deaths”, or “demoralization”. Chavez applies a compare and contrast method in order to lure the audience towards his personal mindset, which particularly favors nonviolence.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Todd May wrote the article “Is American Nonviolence Possible?” to address the growing epidemic of violent crimes and actions across the United States. Mays opens the article with specific examples of very violent events to set the situation to which he is responding so that the reader feels the need for what Mays is explaining in this article. Mays introduces the issue with a rhetorical question, and poses many of these throughout the article so that the audience asks the questions to themselves as they read his stance on how America needs to evaluate how much violence occurs in our nation. The author effectively appeals to the logical feelings of the American people, as well as invokes their emotions into feeling that a change needs to come…

    • 1286 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful resistance, which is a way in an attempt to accomplish goals such as social change, through nonviolent protest. I personally believe that nonviolent resistance impacts our free society, in a positive way. I see it this way because in short, simple words, it is least likely to get someone killed and set a good example for the future generations. This sets a good example because it shows that problems can be solved without blood shed, but instead with words and actions.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Non Violence Essay

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Non-violence is a peaceful way to evoke social and political change. Three cases where non-violence worked were in the countries of India, the United States, and South Africa where people felt they were being treated unjust. Gandhi, King, and Mandela all used non-violence, what made it work? Nonviolence is the practice of refraining from the use of violence when protesting against oppression. The use of non-violence by Gandhi, King, and Mandela worked because they were strong leaders who were able to unify people and used effective methods when protesting.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Violence Satire

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Violence is a sickness and we need to produce a cure, to help our world be one step closer to preventing violence from being what we think of when describing our…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through out the past century our people have continuously been brought down and shoved aside for who we are and what we stand for. The civil rights act of the 1960's was as peaceful as the country would allow but with every peaceful moment the country had brought down intense force trying to stop the change that was heading for America. Where in 1969 the Stonewall Riot was brought about when the patrons began rioting against the police in hopes to stop the police brutality. It then lead to several days of demonstration that helped cause a nationwide appearance of the LGBT+ community. In 2014 after many cases of cops shooting innocent men and some children the Ferguson Riots came to surface.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Americans Should Be Free

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All people should be given the right to say what they want America was made for Freedom that includes freedom of speech we all have different options but we all have the right to express your selves for our society is part of free speech. For we have the right to make jokes about ISIS for example but because we make jokes that mean nothing to us people from different places may get angry at us and some will even kill us even if we draw someone they just might kill us. Like the cartoonists killed for drawing Mohammed. Colleges are limiting free speech they are basically saying “Oh no you can’t say bad things to students you bad boy/girl now go into the safe room and eat your milk and cookies you can talk about them all the time you are in there.” Comedians have sworn off performing at colleges because they say students can’t take a joke.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Freedom of Speech is one of the core values that is proudly embedded in Americans. Although, some people wonder if there should be limits to this right that Americans have, Freedom of Speech. Many citizens are against different forms of hate speech, yet still understand that hate speech is protected under the first amendment. Hate speech is a way for people to express themselves and defend what they believe in.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is a privilege all Americans share. A person can state whatever they please, so long as it doesn’t cause a clear and present danger, without government interference. The idea that someone can legally think, be, and say whatever they want is what lead millions of immigrants to form the U.S. back in 1776 and is the same reason people fight for their right to live here today. Thanks to information being so accessible in this digital age, individuals are told that they are allowed and to study and form an educated opinion. This comes with one catch.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, violence causes many wars between countries. Non-violence helps to solve these problems in different…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “Is Violence the Way to fight Racism?,” Peter Singer, the author argues about the tragedy brought by violent protests that caused death and injuries to society. The author goes on to say that non-violent protesters even support violence after the tragic event from Charlottesville. In this article, Trump stated the problem that risen in Charlottesville was to blame on both white supremacists and non-violence protesters because he didn’t want white supremacists who started violently to take all the blame. Lastly, Singer claims that non-violent won’t solve the problem and need to find a better solution. Although some people believe that using violence can only bring peace, people shouldn’t use violence, and they should know that…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research of “Censorship: Should Language be censored?” Censorship in America is an ongoing debate in today’s society. Many argue there is too much taking place, while others argue we don’t do enough to control it. In this essay we will examine censorship from four different perspectives.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech can be debated on whether or not there should be boundaries to it or not and on what is considered freedom of speech. The First Amendment affirmed that "Congress shall make no law...abridging freedom of speech" but based on www.legal-dictionary.the free dictionary.com it states' All speech is not equal under the First Amendment. The high court has identified five areas of expression that the government may legitimately restrict under certain circumstances. These areas are speech that incites illegal activity and subversive speech, fighting words, obscenity and pornography, commercial speech, and symbolic expression'. On this information and amongst other I believe that freedom of speech is both restricted to a fault and abused.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is a right of citizens that is protected by the U.S constitution. Under this amendment, citizens are able to voice their concerns without being censored by the government. Due to this unlimited freedom, most citizens are using their voice to say hateful and negative things to other citizens. However, should this speech have some type of limitations? They have every right to speak their mind, except when it is harming or hurting another person.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays