In The Sign of Four, Doyle attempts to convey the Sikhs as evil because they convinced Jonathan Small, an white man, to murder a man for his riches. Doyle writes as though Small would never have thought about committing a crime like this, but the Sikhs would because Doyle perceives them as murderers and thieves. When Jonathan Small describes the Sikh characters, he says “They preferred to stand together, and jabber all night in their queer Sikh lingo” (Doyle, 100-101). Small alienates the way the Sikhs talk because the author views this culture as abnormal and displays his views through the thoughts of this character. In this story, Doyle portrays the Sikhs simply as money hungry people that cannot be trusted because they will take advantage of white people if they get the chance. This generalized assumption about the Sikh culture show that there is a subtle racism within the story that is common to European people and their views on non-European people and
In The Sign of Four, Doyle attempts to convey the Sikhs as evil because they convinced Jonathan Small, an white man, to murder a man for his riches. Doyle writes as though Small would never have thought about committing a crime like this, but the Sikhs would because Doyle perceives them as murderers and thieves. When Jonathan Small describes the Sikh characters, he says “They preferred to stand together, and jabber all night in their queer Sikh lingo” (Doyle, 100-101). Small alienates the way the Sikhs talk because the author views this culture as abnormal and displays his views through the thoughts of this character. In this story, Doyle portrays the Sikhs simply as money hungry people that cannot be trusted because they will take advantage of white people if they get the chance. This generalized assumption about the Sikh culture show that there is a subtle racism within the story that is common to European people and their views on non-European people and