Non-Consequentialist Theories Of Ethical Differences

Improved Essays
In chapter 3, we were introduced to different ethical theories and how they were divided. In the sub-section 3.3.3, “Non-consequentialist theories”, it got my attention particularly the Kantian Deontological Theory. While I was reading this theory, I was able to understand that Kant focused on how to fix moral obligation and that he believed that all people had the same reasoning ability however he had made offensive comments against women and non-Europeans. He believed that these groups of people did not have the same capacity of understanding as European people because they were not descendent European and their gender. I disagree with Kant’s theory because it contradicted itself and only was focused to a small group of people (Europeans).

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introduction An Educational leader has an awesome responsibility. There are many challenges as well as opportunities to address. Critical to being successful is the ethical compass which guides your decision making. Every decision should be made for the common good.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In consequentialism the "outcomes" of an activity are everything the activity achieves, including the activity itself. In consequentialism, the "outcomes" of an activity incorporate (a) the activity itself, and (b) everything the activity causes. What then, do these two sorts of result have in like manner, that makes them both "outcomes"? On the off chance that there is an answer, maybe it is something like this: both An itself and the things A reasons are things that happen on the off chance that you do An instead of the distinct options for…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professor Emmart CHFD 220 1008 September 20, 2016 Ethical Dilemma The Religious Employers such as, Hobby Lobby and Wheaton College have decided to refuse health coverage for birth control use because of their moral religious beliefs, from the Affordable Care Act and Patient Protection which in March of 2010, signed a law that ordered group health plans for employers for the employees to accept the financial uncertainly for the plan. This contraception order to improve preventive care for females has provoked backlash from conservative and religious organizations like Hobby Lobby and Wheaton College who belief is that it disrespects some freedom of religion (AMA journal of Ethics, 2013). Religious groups or organization that are nonprofit under the Obamacare are…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology is a famous meta-ethical theory practiced among famous philosophers such as Immanuel Kant, W.D. Ross, Sissela Bok, and many other philosophers and influential people we know. Deontology is focused on “duty” based actions. The entire theory is focused on the duty of people and how they submit to the duty that they have. It is simply defined as duty is the basis of morality. It is also focused around looking at the consequential effects of a particular action that is done.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people have justifications for why they do certain things. Some justifications are based off of happiness, desires, god or morals. People who use happiness and desires as their justification use theories of the good. While those who use god and morals use theories of morality. Some theories that fall into the theories of morality are the divine command theory, consequentialism, and social contract theory.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. Deontology is driven by the duty and righteousness of an action alone rather than the consequences. Deontologists argue that “morality is a matter of duty” (Lacewing 1) and the ethical theory can often be described as “duty-based” or “obligation-based” due to the fact that we are driven by the moral duty to do right based on a moral norm (Turner 7). This ethical theory argues the consequence or justification is irrelevant and determines an action to be right or wrong based on the action itself alone. Deontology differs from its opposing ethical theory Consequentialism, by stating that “right takes priority over good” (____).…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For centuries, philosophers have applied sets of normative principles in effort to distinguish if an action is morally right or wrong. The purpose of normative ethics is to help guide society on how humans ought to act. These theories provide justifiable and reliable outcomes to determine if an action is moral or immoral. Two principles that play a significant role in normative ethics are consequentialism and Kantianism. When faced with a moral dilemma, these theories may agree or conflict with one another.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant was a deontologist and developed an unbreakable moral code that he called the “Categorical Imperative”. Kant characterized the Categorical Imperative as an objective, rationally necessary, and unconditional principle that people must…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume and Immanuel Kant are both known for their great contributions to moral philosophy. Hume who is mainly known for his empiricism, skepticism and naturalism and Kant who is best recognized for his great work in metaphysics, ethics and also for his contributions in others disciplines in the area of philosophy. Although they were both exceptional philosophers and gave stupendous apports, Hume and Kant agreed nor differed in various aspect and ideas. Hume believed and is mostly based on his empiricism which involves the theory of the mind. Hume’s empiricism consist in to affirm that the moral foundation is not in the reason but in the senses.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the major tenets with this theory is that morality is based strictly on the intentions of an individual rather than on the consequences of an action itself. The problem with this aspect of this theory is that we can have the greatest intentions possible but still have catastrophic consequences. Secondly, Kant argued that for an act to be moral, that it must always be done from duty. The problem here is that if we adhere to the “wrong” moral laws to begin with, then even if we have and engage in perfect duty to those laws, then our actions would also be wrong by default. Then of course, those duties have to universal and without contradiction.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is there a moral difference between male and female prostitution? I believe that there is not a moral difference, and both male and female prostitution is morally wrong even if the circumstances are that everyone involved is 18 years of age, it is not a form of slavery, and that there is no more duress than most people encounter in difficult lives. To defend my position, I will use the Kantianism to respect people at all times. Throughout my argument, I will focus on the principles and morals behind the decision to sell yourself for sex, rather than the results that follow the act of prostitution. Kant’s ethical theory states that moral duties are absolute and universal.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Ethical Approaches Nigel Floyd BA500 Management Dr. Diane Hamilton7/21/2015 Grantham University Comparing Ethical Approaches Ethics is about good or bad, right or wrong for a given situation, decision making or an action. It is difficult to define ethics in a precise way, but can be referred to as "ethics is a code of moral principles and values that governs the behavior of person or group with respect to what is right or wrong" (Daft, 2010). Organizations conduct ethical training programs to inculcate ethical behavior among their employees. The employees who are aware of ethics may not reveal confidential data of the organization. Ethical training seeks to help people understand the ethical aspects of decision making and to incorporate high ethical standards into a daily behavior of employees (Schermerhorn & Bachrach, 2015).…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the other hand, Deontology, also known as Kantianism, is an ethical theory based in rationalism where the motives determine the ethical value of the act, not the consequences. In deontology, Kant suggests that there are universal ethical rules that are common sense and gathered through reason, not experience (Burkhardt and Nathaniel, 32; vol. 2). Therefore, the moral rules are applicable to everyone regardless of the situation. As a result, everyone who is a person has the right to equality, privacy, veracity, and freedom. Another important aspect of deontology is the idea of humans creating their own destinies and making their own decisions.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays