Non-clashing absolutists touch base at the same conclusion as do evaluated absolutists-that may be, Rahab did not sin in her misleading though by means of an alternate course. Though evaluated absolutists hold that Rahab's breaking of reality standard was not a transgression since it was conferred in a perspective of a more prominent great, non-clashing absolutists show that Rahab's double dealing was not an infringement of an ethical supreme by any means. Outline, a non-clashing absolutist, gives a general meaning of lying as he asks, "What, then, is a falsehood? I would say that an untruth is a word or act that purposefully cheats a neighbor with a specific end goal to hurt him… .The wrongdoing of false witness is that of bending the certainties
