Nomads Vs Mongols

Improved Essays
Nomadic people have been a staple of world history throughout time as they have played an important role in the world we have today. In Eurasia, which is modern day Europe and Asia, there were many strong groups of nomadic people who moved frequently. Two of these groups were the Mongols and the Seljuk nomads. Although there are many reasons, these nomadic groups moved more often because of environmental, social, and political problems in their lands. To begin, the Mongols were a strong nomadic powerhouse located originally in the East steppes of Central Asia through the 13th and 14th century. They spent their time in the grassy steppes growing a strong group of people who were skilled archers, equestrians, and strong conquerors. They were …show more content…
These people were a group of nomadic people from Central Asia who made a strong empire in Persia during the 11th century. They moved frequently as they had herds of animals, like the Mongols, who needed grass to graze on. Originally, the nomadic people followed a religion based on religious people named shamans, who has supernatural ability. Both the Seljuq and Mongols were influenced by the religions they came across during their movements. The Seljuk Turks were the first to have a large-scale conversion when they turned to Islam and entered Iran to have a better relationship with the Abbasid authorities and caliphate. The Seljuq were also very similar to the Mongols, as they were taught horsemanship at a very young age, which led to the expansion of their people. Their military was able to conquer many people because of their archery skills and also by outmaneuvering their opponents. Like most nomadic groups, the Seljuq people lived on the outskirts of the Abbasid Empire because they lack manufactured goods and valued trading. By the mid eleventh century, the Seljuq people were in the Abbasid Empire and outshined the Abbasids. In 1055, the Tughril Beg was elected sultan of the Abbasid Empire, which was key in the uprising of the Seljuk people. Soon, they expanded to Syria, Palestine, and other focused their attention to Anatolia. Seljuk warriors were able to overthrow Byzantium and transform Anatolia. They put taxes of the Byzantine church and welcomed Islamic converts. Overall, the Seljuk were important to the history of Eurasia and although they were a nomadic force, they were able to conquer substantial

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Historians believe that the mongol invasion of europe and asia brought about positive as well as negative consequences. One way they should this is by the mongols tricking their enemies. In passage one it says they told their enemy that they surrender and waited till they all came out of their castle to slaughter everybody they saw.this supports my thesis because it shows that they tricked people a lot.so by doing that they cant help each other because they could just think the mongols are trying to trick them so they won't believe them and won't help them do anything. In passage two it says a good thing they did was introduce trade and help make trading routes.when the mongols made routes to trade on they allowed people to get goods they couldn't get where they live and it helped spread culture and religions to other parts of the world.while the road was new it started a period of peace called pax mongolia.with the new trails they opened up hospitals and orphanages.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were people from Central Asia who came together to establish an empire which lasted from 1206 CE to 1368 CE. They were herdsmen and tradesmen who herded sheep and goats, and were nomadic people. Even though at first the Mongol community was small, they were able to expand by conquering China, Persia, and Russia. The Mongols were culturally destructive and constructive to a moderate extent in Persia during the 13th century because they positively influenced academics while they subjugated agriculture.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the Mongols were barbaric and very destructive and unforgiving people. Although they were barbaric, they united Eurasia and spread ideas and were very intelligent. One reason why they were barbaric is how they ruled in battle. While they were in battle, the Mongols had one person in charge of 10 warriors and then one person in charge of 10 of those groups of ten (100) and then ten of those ten (1000) and genghis would tell only a few people what to do and it would be a chain reaction of how the orders went around to everyone. If only a few people flee from battle out of a ten person group, the whole entire group is sIaughtered.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a. The armies were dominated by infantry and divisions that were made up of troops that were known as Janissaries. They had control over the artillery and firearms. b. They would have elaborate court rituals, similar to early Byzantine, Persian and Arab.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although the ways the Mongols dealt with war and prisoners were barbaric, their society and way of life was extremely civilized. For example, the Mongols buried prisoners alive, which was extremely barbaric. Document four states “They severed the heads of the slain from their bodies and heaped them up in piles, keeping those of the men separate from those of the women and children.” This act was also extremely barbaric.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    DBQ On Modern Day Mongols

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Modern Day Mongols ~ The Mongols could be your worst nightmare destroying your village and killing all your family and friends or your best friend keeping you safe and making sure you had everything you needed but thats depending on whose side you were on. The Mongols were somewhat barbaric warriors that lived in the 13th century and took over most of Asia, The Middle East and Eastern Europe using barbaric Tactics. Even though the Mongols had barbaric tendencies they also protected their own. The Mongols were barbaric because they were an army that killed without remorse. They served the heads of the slain from their bodies and heaped them up in piles {Document 4}.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mongols Dbq Analysis

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Mongols sophisticated military tactics, organized ethical and religious codes, their economic contributions, and road systems are tributes to the fact that they are not barbarians. The Mongols had displayed organized military strategies to aid their conquests that can only be achieved by intelligent and well thought out planning. Planning such as surrounding their enemy and attacking their fortresses from all sides; this cornered their enemies and allowed for easy attack. The Mongolians also had tactics like placing dummies on horses to give the impression that a great crowd of ready to fight men were assembled at the battle ground. ( Doc 3)…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 13th century, a small tribe from the steppes of Central Asia had conquered most of the known world at the time. Mongols rode on the back of horses, as they swept most of Asia, the Middle East and Eastern Europe. It has never been seen before at the time, they had even taken over more land than Alexander the Great, the mongols taking 4,860,000 square miles of land. (Document 1). The mongols were fearless warriors who took over people's land yet they weren't as barbaric as they seem.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were a nomadic civilization that never settled in one place. They lived in yurts or tents that could be easily packed up and moved. In the early 12th century, the Mongols were made up of many tribes who often fought and competed for land and livestock. In 1206, Genghis Khan united these tribes and the Mongols went on to become the most successful warriors in history. Although the Mongols brutally killed and murdered many people, they developed battle tactics, laws, and an acceptance of religion that demonstrated that was an advanced society.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Mongols caused death and destruction to whatever came its way. These Barbarians captured land and killed everything in sight in the 13th century. Barbarians is a word to describe a negative meaning, referring to people who were savage and evil. This meaning is what the Mongols portrayed through their actions of mass destruction.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suleiman was also known as the lawgiver and the laws he created worked successfully to better rule his empire. Suleiman worked on new ideas that strengthened his government and military, but also addressed taxation and the treatment of peasants. Suleiman changed laws so that people were paid for their services, established a simpler taxation policy, and established new rules regarding crime and punishment. Because of his fair systems of laws, Suleiman was known as a great legislator, who made his empire a place of personal freedom and security for his subjects for his subjects. For his subjects for his subjects for his subjects Suleiman and the Ottoman Empire were also very successful because of his ideas and practices of religious tolerance.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Mongols created the largest empire in all of history. The land they had conquered is more than two times that of the next greatest conqueror, Alexander the Great. But unlike Alexander, who is often remembered as a hero, the legacy of the Mongols is one of brutality and barbarism. But in truth, these so-called “barbarians” were, in fact, not very barbaric at all. Recent discoveries challenged the long-accepted statement of Mongols being savage brutes, suggesting that they were perhaps wrongly labelled; the facts about them were twisted and lost to history.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: How Barbaric were the "Barbarians"? Although Mongols were strikingly ruthless through their military tactics (Doc. 2, 3,4,5), they were able to develop a rather sophisticated society (Doc. 7, 9, 10) and executed noteworthy and structured accomplishments (Doc. 1, 6, 8). As shown in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5, the Mongolians are quite infamous for their questionable harshness considering their military techniques.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were horse riding people that began gaining power in 1130 A.D and their empire collapsed in late 1368 A.D. They were known for their warfare methods, which were extremely unique at the time because they rode on horseback and completely destroyed every surrounding civilization they went into war with. The Mongols were also known for having one of the most iniquitous rulers of all time, Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan then passed the empire on to his grandson, Kublai Khan. Throughout this paper I will be discussing how the Mongol Empire was founded, how their education system worked, daily life, housing, how horses became such a big part of the Mongol Empire, Genghis Khan being in power, warfare for the Mongols, passing the empire on to Kublai Khan, and contributing factors of the empire ending in 1368.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With a very advanced and large military, warfare with others was constant, and very harsh. With this strength, and willingness to do whatever was necessary to obtain new land, the empire was able to conquer land from the Persian Gulf, all the way to the Mediterranean Sea and even in some parts of Egypt. (Page 130 Map 4.2) Once…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays