“Lifes of little ones are destroyed when child labor is employed.” Today, throughout the world around 215 million children work, and many of those work full time leaving no room to develop as an adolescent. These children may either be working under the worst forms of child labor such as forced recruitment for slavery or prostitution. In addition, they may be children under-minimal age preforming labor or performing labor that jeopardizes their physical, mental and moral well-being of the child. Children are robbed of their rights on a daily bases and are competing to get their hands on basic needs. Due to the increase of property and wealth in private hands, it has resulted in children going off to work before they can multiply. They simply
…show more content…
Children are told what to do and how to do everything while having very little to say about it. This is a great example of alienation of the process and the only way to fix a society with this issue is to go extremely to the left towards communism. In a society with child labor, the mangers make all the big decisions, but the children do all the dirty, labor work and receives very little. To stabilize this problem, wealth and power should be shared equally by all members of the society, therefore, there would be no rich class or poor class, which would eliminate the reason for child labor. Children undergo child labor because the money is needed to help them provide for themselves and the family, and if the community regulates all aspects of the economy and society then, the overall wealth is owned by the community. One needs to keep in mind that one family doesn’t experience child labor by themselves, it is rather a collection of families in the same region. The reason for why liberalism would not work in this case is because, if private property is to be respected, but the government should also take care of the less wealthy, it does not seem ideal or realistic due to numerous of children in child labor. It would be more logical and beneficial if there were no private property to even create child labor to begin with. Most children work for big companies or factories which are owned by …show more content…
The key political concept is that they all need money and they compete with one another just to provide themselves with basic needs that first world countries throw around. This is referred to as alienation from other people, where instead of working as a collective to achieve one goal, it is every man for themselves. Communism would allow for all property and wealth to be shared by the community and everyone contributes what they can and receives what they need, which makes no room for competition. Everyone will receive an equal education and health care and there is no mix of public and private education and health care which ultimately is the flaw in a society with child labor. Without having a rich and poor class everyone can simply have their needs provided and the community can govern itself. Furthermore, the community can benefit from their own production rather than just have a few private hands that own the vast majority of factories and companies. Liberalism simply does not work in this case because, it is just not logical because if the government has a limited role in regulating the economy and society, but needs to balance this with the rights of private enterprises, they simply cannot protect the children’s rights at the
Children are told what to do and how to do everything while having very little to say about it. This is a great example of alienation of the process and the only way to fix a society with this issue is to go extremely to the left towards communism. In a society with child labor, the mangers make all the big decisions, but the children do all the dirty, labor work and receives very little. To stabilize this problem, wealth and power should be shared equally by all members of the society, therefore, there would be no rich class or poor class, which would eliminate the reason for child labor. Children undergo child labor because the money is needed to help them provide for themselves and the family, and if the community regulates all aspects of the economy and society then, the overall wealth is owned by the community. One needs to keep in mind that one family doesn’t experience child labor by themselves, it is rather a collection of families in the same region. The reason for why liberalism would not work in this case is because, if private property is to be respected, but the government should also take care of the less wealthy, it does not seem ideal or realistic due to numerous of children in child labor. It would be more logical and beneficial if there were no private property to even create child labor to begin with. Most children work for big companies or factories which are owned by …show more content…
The key political concept is that they all need money and they compete with one another just to provide themselves with basic needs that first world countries throw around. This is referred to as alienation from other people, where instead of working as a collective to achieve one goal, it is every man for themselves. Communism would allow for all property and wealth to be shared by the community and everyone contributes what they can and receives what they need, which makes no room for competition. Everyone will receive an equal education and health care and there is no mix of public and private education and health care which ultimately is the flaw in a society with child labor. Without having a rich and poor class everyone can simply have their needs provided and the community can govern itself. Furthermore, the community can benefit from their own production rather than just have a few private hands that own the vast majority of factories and companies. Liberalism simply does not work in this case because, it is just not logical because if the government has a limited role in regulating the economy and society, but needs to balance this with the rights of private enterprises, they simply cannot protect the children’s rights at the