No Kill

Decent Essays
• We received a couple emails regarding Peta’s article “Don’t Trust the No-Kill Lie” claiming that the policy of no-kill is actually harming animals. Since I have not read Peta’s article, I put together a response using Francis Battista’s blog, "confused about what no-kill means and doesn’t mean?” regarding this very subject to clarify the no-kill philosophy and dispel the myths surrounding the no-kill mission.

• Debbie Pinsky and her family are planning a family volunteer vacation and she wanted to know if we had volunteer vacation opportunities at any other locations besides the sanctuary. While we have volunteer opportunities at our other locations, I explained the difference between the sanctuary and the adoption centers.

• Annette
…show more content…
I called our awesome website folks and they were able to fix it by taking the apostrophes out of the message. I called the member and she seemed to be happy.

• Elissa Masey called to say her group it trying to use the Tugg website for a Champion fundraiser, but Tugg pulled the website. In discussing this with Elissa, I found out that the website is not down. I contacted Elissa Masey and we went over the website together and it turned out that she was misunderstanding which licensing she needed for her event. I guess a friend of hers started the event and then turned it over to her. When she viewed it, she thought Tugg had discontinued the program.

• Carolann Larson called because she wanted to know where she can buy one of the vet machines and how well it works posted as a future wish in the fall newsletter. I explained that the machine is something listed on our wish list and is not something we actually have here at the clinic. She said she wanted to know because she wants to buy one to see if it will work for her. There are many listings for the machine when doing a Google search, however, I cautioned her to do her research when doing so. As odd as it may sound, this is not the first elderly person who called asking the same

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Greenhill community center suffered in the fundraising portion of the organization because members of the boards wanted to personalize every event so they could receives some type of…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The worldwide massacre of consuming animals and wearing their skins is accountable for the massive deaths of more than 150 billion animals annually. So then wouldn’t it be reasonable to ask, “Is my sandwich or my leather shoes really worth the pain and endless suffering of innocent animals?” If you asked vegan animal liberation activist, Gary Yourofsky, the answer would be a definite and absolute no. When discovering the gruesome reality of animal injustice, his passion for spreading awareness, and his willingness to put himself in danger for the freedom of the animals, Gary Yourofsky has been exceedingly significant to the fight for animal liberation. Discovering the gruesome reality that animals go through was a life changing event that…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    J Baird Callicott’s central criticism against animal liberationists (AL) is that the ethic is individualistic and limited to the concern of animal suffering; this ethic does not consider the morality of preserving the ecosystem. An AL argues that the interests of animals should be considered because they experience pain and suffering. They argue that the ethics of equality should be applied to other animals; all beings capable of suffering are worthy of equal consideration. Intelligence, value to a system, population size, or the destructive nature of the animal has no bearing in this consideration.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Killing Coyotes

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The title of the article "Why Killing Coyotes Doesn't Make Livestock Safe" is an effective hook because it draws in readers from both sides of the debate it discusses. Conservationists will be concerned with wildlife populations, and owners of livestock will be interested in the safety of their own animals. Megan M. Draheim's article follows up on its title with a startling introduction: the US government's Wildlife Services killed more than 70,000 coyotes in the year of 2016. Despite the fact that Wildlife Services is more than capable of utilizing methods of predator repellent that do not kill wild animals, they proceed with extermination. Wildlife Services mediates between wildlife and humans, trying to find compromises between the two.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement. The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Your grandfather’s Alzheimer’s has progressed to such a degree that his mental capabilities are no more than those of a lab rat. Scientists are in need of test subjects, so your grandpa is shipped off to a facility where they test unregulated amounts of drugs, makeup, and shampoos on him. R. G. Frey uses this example of testing on cognitively impaired humans throughout his piece, “Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism.”. This paper will outline Frey’s arguments on why human life generally has more value than animal life and highlight the exceptions to the rule that justify the mentioned scenario, while also presenting objections to the unequal value thesis and evaluating those oppositions with respect to humans with cognitive disabilities…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine life without depending on any animals. For some it may be easy for instance a vegetarian but hard for the meat lovers. Animals do much more than just feeding us. They can find cures for diseases like cancer and AIDS. In the essay “The Evil of Animal Rights,” there is a group of people who disagree with animal testing.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Heedlessness of Animal Rights Animal rights are the rights believed to belong to animals, so they can live experiment-free. The basic principle of animal rights according to PETA states that “animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on or use for entertainment” (BROOK). It is no secret that animal rights is one of the paramount controversial topics of the 21st century. There are still debates today between animal rights activists and animal rights terrorists. However animal rights activists seem to captivate different audiences through the media.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are various sides and opinions on animal cruelty, and they all vary according to the type of animal cruelty being done. In the article Is Hunting a Form of Cruelty for Animals? Dawn Laney, of the Greenhaven press illustrates the controversy on animal hunting after it was reported in the 2005 Washington post, that a young girl shot the first bear of the Maryland Bear Hunting season. In the eighth edition of Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors Stuart and James Rachel in chapter 7.4, pose the question of how to tell whether the treatment of animal is right or wrong. Each one of these pieces of writing aim at a certain type of animal cruelty and talk about the supporting and opposing points in each argument.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brandon P Thomas English 3 8/8/2015 Research Paper Experimenting on Animals is Wrong! Do you know what your tax dollars are being used on? Would it surprise you to know that you’re paying for the experimentation of animals? Death is what will become of animals if they are inhumanly treated. They will either end up dying of exhaustion, disease, severe bodily damage, or sheer pain.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By definition humans are animals. Humans kill humans and it is a massive crime. The question remains: why is that when animals are killed by humans, it’s completely accepted? As scientific research has revealed more of the nature of our fellow animals in recent years, many people over the world have debated and petitioned for a bill of rights for animals. There should be a bill of rights for animals because they exhibit humanlike cognitive abilities and emotions and must be protected from harmful abuse, but these rights must not blur the line with human rights.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Chenes, Elizabeth D., ed. Animal Welfare. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Print.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of animals in research is widely accepted, particularly within the scientific community. However, with the rise of new technologies and growing concern over animal welfare, the ethics of animal experimentation and the extent to which it is practiced has increasingly come into question. Although animal experimentation is regulated to prevent excessive suffering, opponents argue that these measures are insufficient. Proponents of animal research argue that knowledge gained from it and the various applications for it justify the unethical manner by which that knowledge is obtained. This argument neglects critical moral considerations rooted in deontology and utilitarianism which condemn the unethical use of animals for the advancement…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many people concern on what is right and wrong for animal treatment. These arguments are a major issue because many different views and beliefs of people reflect on them. Manly fighting and understanding who has the right over animals is the major concept. Since animals can not speak and choose for their own actions, many people believe that a truthful owner should have the say on what is right for their animal through their beliefs. No matter what regulations are set both sides of the argument will never be satisfied on how humans treat animals.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays