In the article, “The Long-Term Effects of Prison-Based Drug Treatment and Aftercare Services on Recidivism” David Olson found that individuals who participated in the treatment and aftercare programs for drug offense in Illinois had a lower chance of returning to prison (Olson). In the Sheridan Correctional Center (SCC) in Illinois, “researchers found that individuals who participated in drug treatment had a 15% lower chance of returning to prison and individuals who participated in aftercare programs had a 44% lower chance of returning to prison” (Olson). Therefore, the No Entry Strategy programs help reduce the incarceration rate by helping people with their drug problems. As a result, people are less likely to return to prison or jails for drug …show more content…
As stated above, the average cost of the No Entry Strategy treatment programs is about $4,000 for one year compared to $21,000 for one year in prison whereas, the Sentencing Reform and Correction Act only reduces the amount of time spent in jail or prison. As a result, the prevention and treatment programs are still more cost effective than the Sentencing Reform and Correction Act. This is one reason why prevention and treatment programs such as the No Entry Strategy programs, are a better solution for reducing drug offenses affecting the incarceration rate than the Sentencing Reform and Correction