1. The union wanted to establish the company’s act as a UPL because, otherwise it would be an economic strike and the workers wouldn’t be entitled to get their jobs back. However, I think that the company did not committed a ULP because Gibson claimed in good faith that the strike was illegal, since the old CBA had a no strike clause and stated that it will stayed valid until they created a new one.
2. The Board of Education committed a ULP because they terminate the position to avoid arbitration. The Board of education had the responsibility to bargaining in good faith on the English teacher.
3. He violated the NLRA because he was refusing to hire union members.
4. The company violated the NLRA because it was trying to defeat the union …show more content…
The company committed ULP because Eads locked out its employees by denying to allow them go back to work. And also because the company did not allowed them to bargain the lockout.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. Yes, it should because the NLRB can help protect the Private University interests on improving wages, hours, working conditions, benefits, and retirement etc. for all its members.
2. The company have to pay Castro because he was wrongfully discharge for supporting the organization of a union. By doing this Hoffman was interfering with the efforts to organize a union, which is a violation of ULP. Even though Castro lied to the company, during his time working he contribute to the company and he is entitle for the time he work for Hoffman’s company.
3. This is up to him because he cannot be forced to rehire these workers since Sit Down strikes are not protected by the law. He can refused to rehired them since their strike cause some loss to the business, but he can also rehired them since the demand improve and he needs workers.
4. I think we should be able to decide whether or not we want to be part of a union. Only union members who want to be part of a union should have to pay dues for the benefits that a union provides. A union is like a type of insurance for which we have to pay to get its
2. The Board of Education committed a ULP because they terminate the position to avoid arbitration. The Board of education had the responsibility to bargaining in good faith on the English teacher.
3. He violated the NLRA because he was refusing to hire union members.
4. The company violated the NLRA because it was trying to defeat the union …show more content…
The company committed ULP because Eads locked out its employees by denying to allow them go back to work. And also because the company did not allowed them to bargain the lockout.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. Yes, it should because the NLRB can help protect the Private University interests on improving wages, hours, working conditions, benefits, and retirement etc. for all its members.
2. The company have to pay Castro because he was wrongfully discharge for supporting the organization of a union. By doing this Hoffman was interfering with the efforts to organize a union, which is a violation of ULP. Even though Castro lied to the company, during his time working he contribute to the company and he is entitle for the time he work for Hoffman’s company.
3. This is up to him because he cannot be forced to rehire these workers since Sit Down strikes are not protected by the law. He can refused to rehired them since their strike cause some loss to the business, but he can also rehired them since the demand improve and he needs workers.
4. I think we should be able to decide whether or not we want to be part of a union. Only union members who want to be part of a union should have to pay dues for the benefits that a union provides. A union is like a type of insurance for which we have to pay to get its