I want to start off by saying that Friedrich Nietzsche was one of the more complicated philosophers that I ever had pleasure of studying. What I took away from Friedrich Nietzsche opinions on the death of God is that he was referring to the declining belief and respect for God or religion in general. Nietzsche felt that with the loss of religion the west would lose its distinctive cultural identity. Friedrich Nietzsche was not a big fan of Christianity to say the least, but he still understood its importance and its benefits to the culture. Friedrich Nietzsche, in my humble opinion had a strange outlook on morality.…
“From where in the human head did logic arise? Certainly from the illogical, whose domain must originally have been tremendous.” (Guignon/Pereboom, pp. 136). In the first sentences of Nietzsche’s aphorism “source of the logical” Nietzsche establishes his original style of writing as he introduces the topic of discussion. The commencement has a sort of elegance to it mainly due to the contradictory connotations implied. Nietzsche’s unique way of writing leaves plenty of room for personal interpretations and, as a result, a few key concepts arise. Is Nietzsche referencing an evolutionary perspective? Stating that the logical part of the brain developed through natural selection out of a large illogical part.…
How Siddhartha is going through Nietzsche's Three Metamorphoses For many years intellects from around the world have wondered what the key to true enlightenment is. They have wondered how people can balance their physical and spiritual life, and lead a moral, and satisfying life. With his 1922 novel, Siddhartha, Hermann Hesse addresses these concerns, and through narrating the story of the young prince, tries to answer to these wonders. On a journey of multiple lessons, Siddhartha experiences rebirth, and enlightenment. Moreso, these rebirths Siddhartha undergoes are a representation of the young Brahmin going through the Three Metamorphoses that are seen in Nietzsche’s…
Nietzsche’s writing are very distinctive and provocative in their style. His writing are designed to provoke question or even to provoke doubts rather to answer basic philosophical questions. In this respect, Nietzsche has a particular fondness for use of metaphors, parabolas and aphorism. Nietzsche in his book ‘On Genealogy of morality’ sought to prove certain points about the morality by tracking its history, the way and which people are conceived of morality. Nietzsche takes the view that morality should be grounded in ascetic values…..…
He gives the example of knowledge and charity as a means of possession because when a child gets some knowledge from his teacher he thinks in a way as his teacher wants him to think. Nietzsche express discontent to “slave revolt in morality” which believes rich, powerful as evil and poor as good. 6. We scholars: With the success of science and scholar, the level of philosophy…
Nietzsche relates a lot to White in the sense of things not mattering and if nothing matters therefore God doesn’t exist. Black mentions the bible to White, as a book he reads. White comments back in he has never and that book and its not true. “The Bible is full of cautionary tales.…
Heidi Kelchner provides a quick reference that consists of different components of the novel, along with a list of the main characters and their descriptions. She then summarizes the plot of the novel. Kelchner discusses how Jack London is famous for his adventure novels and his technique of portraying animals as ‘compelling’ leaders in society. Many contend against his use of this technique, criticizing how it toys with the reader’s emotions. However, the reasons behind London’s use go deeper, reflecting a scientific and philosophical issue: the hereditary correlation between humans and animals.…
“Knowledge” recurring many times throughout the Frankenstein novel. A word that speaks for itself but also can have different meanings. It is also a powerful tool to that can be used as a result of our judgment. “Knowledge consists in recognizing the difference between good and bad decisions”. (Knowledge Intellectual understanding)…
In Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, the concept of truth is developed and bent and flipped in on itself over and over, especially in “How to Tell a True War Story.” In this chapter, O’Brien sets abstract definitions to the seemingly concrete idea of truth. These definitions of a “true war story,” as convoluted and contradictory as they seem, all ultimately prove to be true, just as all versions of a story are true because the story changes as the emotions that drive it change. In the end, according to O’Brien, it’s the story that lasts, so it is the story that becomes the truth.…
This did come at a price though, Nietzsche’s style of writing changed. Nietzsche did not notice the change until one of his friends wrote him a letter. The letter said how his writing has become more “telegraphic and tighter.” Once Nietzsche received this letter he soon wrote back, “our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts.” So, Nietzsche did agree with his friend.…
For Nietzche, truth is a completely perspectival phenomena. There is no overarching truth and, so, the individual must make truth for himself/herself. Kierkegaard held a similar view. But, in Kierkegaard's theory of truth, one could not come to know the truth until one became in the truth via a “leap of faith”. Sartre was a nihilist and believed that, if there was some form of truth, it did not give life a meaning.…
Knowledge is developed through much reading and being able to be a critical thinker. Every person who can think has a different definition of what knowledge is and how it is beneficial. Ignorance and knowledge both contradict each other very well in the book Fahrenheit 451. People learn more than any other way from their mistakes. It’s very important that people learn from them.…
Nietzsche characterized Europe in late nineteenth century as nihilistic, and even considered the late twentieth century to be even more so. He generalizes that we no longer need a God, that a God doesn 't give us meaning and purpose to our lives. Our lives are simply meaningless and lack the capacity to become anything new. Nietzsche stressed that without a sole purpose of living, we would create a new world built on weakness and comfort. He also foresaw that nihilism might lead to radical nationalism, causing horrific wars.…
Because of the corruption that may occur through knowledge, I believe God limits our capacity for knowledge. God gives us the basic survival skills, as well as a moral compass. He also inspires us with knowledge and understanding that we need at times. God provides us with sufficient knowledge for the purpose we have here on…
I define knowledge as something that you are aware of. Knowledge in my terms does not have to be truthful or factual; there is no relevance factor on what knowledge can be either. Knowledge in my terms can just be anything as long as you are aware of it. So for…