Nietzsche's Criticism Of Religion

Superior Essays
Religious truth claims and religious institutional ideology have long been subjected to criticism. They are often laid out in the form of a critique where one expresses their opinion on the subject. Marx, Freud and Nietzsche have offered their own critiques on how they feel about religion. The one being most persuasive of all is that of Nietzsche with Marx being the least persuasive. Nietzsche’s opinion, to me, seems more appealing while Marx’s doesn’t seem to offer all that much. Nietzsche conveys his religious criticism in his book known as “The Anti-Christ”. He focuses on the religious institutional ideology of Christianity. He begins to describe it in Section 2 where he claims “Active pity for all the failures and all the weak: Christianity” …show more content…
It is unnatural to him. All religions and ideologies have been created by man. What makes what one person came up with more true than what another has? No one should have the power to make you believe that all you do is wrong. Every thought, word and action you commit to can harm you. If you promote sin and/or give into it, you are deemed to go to this place called hell. He doesn’t condemn all that Christianity imposes but most he despises. He influences one to re-think about religion. Religion doesn’t permit someone to want to do more and feel more fulfilled. Instead, it makes you restrict all that you do to a certain set of standards and morals. He drives me to rethink and question all that I know regarding my own religion which is …show more content…
They allow for me to picture in my head a society where what he said is actually believed by many instead of the few. Religion has come a long way throughout history, but it is something that will continue to live on. People will never be able to stop believing in something that just isn’t real. It’s like telling someone to start their whole life over living by a new set of truths and morals. Like Nietzsche said “Faith means not wanting to know what is true” (Nietzsche,http://listverse.com/2007/12/07/top-15-quotes-by-famous-atheists/). Religion will continue to govern people’s lives if they never want to experience the truth. Truth is too much for most people to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The difference between the religious and the atheist is that the atheist do not try to justify their morals with a religion. Religious people may view themselves as more moral than atheist because they may suffer from the just world phenomenon. They may view the world has ultimately being a just place; hence religious people will have more of a tendency to blame people for their lack of morality as a result of them not believing in a God. This all too well creates a divide between Atheism and religion. Atheists typically see religion as irrational as noted in the book, Riveted.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morals Without God There are many theists in the world, whether they be Christian or Islamic, but they all believe in some form of god. Whether it be Allah or Ra, they still follow a “moral code of conduct,” instructed to them by the divine. Atheists are harassed by theists, trying to denounce that the atheists are a cruel people because they don’t have a god to set morals for them. However, atheists set morals based on those around them, and basic human principles. Atheists have morals without a god.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion Vs Constitution

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Religion as a law or constitution is a daily controversial issue between a believer and a thinker. The believer argues that religion is accessible for any place and any time because it came from God. On the other side, the thinker articulates that religion is not manageable to build a society under the circumstances of developments and open minding concept that the human being has reached. Even though people are teachable and everyone can think for his/her own sake, some thing people gained from the surroundings without being taught by someone. Furthermore, These days some people live under threaten of racism and comparison because people are having luck of mind communicating, and most of the times their emotions are the ones who take control…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Between Ivan Karamazov and Nietzsche, I think that Nietzsche makes the stronger argument against religious faith. Nietzsche, in Section 2 of the Antichrist, begins by condemning Christianity by saying “Active pity for all the failures and all the weak: Christianity.” Christianity gives people hope for the failures and weaknesses by letting them slide. It doesn’t teach them that they should grow stronger from their mistakes. Instead, it tells them that failing is okay because they tried and didn’t succeed.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although Paine believes there to be a god, he does not believe that structured religion benefits anyone; in fact he calls them “human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind”. Paine clearly states his disdain for organized religion, for him personally, however he recognizes that not all people believe the same thing, and should not be condemned for they have equal rights to their beliefs. Thomas Paine believed that all had the right to believe what they so choose, and that being said, being mentally faithful to oneself is a necessity in life. “Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving, it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe (Paine 654).” Being true to what you believe in, whether or not that is a God or nothing, is the basis of morality. How can someone be morally sound when they falsely claim to…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche being an atheist was faced with the dilemma of having no moral code to follow. Nietzsche’s statement which originates from his books The Gay Science, and Thus Spoke Zarathustra, is often mistaken as a celebratory statement that reflects the triumph of atheism over theism and instituted religion. However, Nietzsche’s statement actually reflects his concern that atheists are simply directionless without an institution or a moral guide. Nietzsche is one of the few atheists that are brave enough to address this issue, as if God is dead, (or never existed according to Nietzsche himself) then all actions are permissible and humans have no guide in life or even a moral code to follow. Nietzsche’s respond to this atheist problem resides in his own philosophy and views and morality.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that true knowledge can be based only on facts, and any idea which is not supported by a valid scientific argument should perish. Since religion cannot provide a reasonable answer to criticism, it is often beaten by anyone who identifies the inconsistency between the shared views of the church and gathered facts from science. But is there any solution to such a significant problem which will end the numerous and meaningless arguments? During the 19th century the idea that there was a contradiction between the scientific knowledge and religious faith was widespread amongst the people. It is not a secret that science and religion are quite opposite especially in their explanations of why we must do things in a particular…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Nietzsche’s claim God represents the authority which is held over us and stops us from having absolute control over our lives. Also that He represents all the old beliefs and traditions that today’s society is still practicing. In other words God is the old society where He was given all the power and praise which according to Nietzsche is the wrong idea and yet we still continue to live this way. It can be seen that we are still living in the shadow of God even in 2015. Even though according to Christians Jesus died on the cross centuries ago we are still reminded of him.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When discussing the omniscience of God, Warren makes a clear distinction that was not made by Mackie: God knows everything that is able to be known. Certain things simply cannot be known because they are impossible to actually be done or known. He also makes another clear distinction as to the omni-benevolence of God. God loves the sinner, but utterly despises the sin that that sinner commits. Stating that God’s word demands that His servants demonstrate to the best of their ability His moral character, Warren does his best to distinguish the differences between that viewpoint and Mackie’s viewpoint.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    cannot be dictated by anything or anyone but themselves. He rejects what he terms “deterministic excuses” as he says that instead of blaming their actions or behaviour, they should take responsibility for it. Sartre believed that we as individuals have no certain way of formulating morality. He mentioned that if we follow a moral system or religion, we are acting in “bad faith” by denying that we have the responsibility for our choices and actions. This all leads back to the philosophy of God and Knowledge.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics