's Contrast The Heaviest Burden By Nietzsche And Husserl

This verse has a striking similarity with Nietzsche 's explanation of Gay Science that should carry the heaviest burden. Hafez also believes that this burden is so heavy that even the whole cosmological order could not carry it and flinched from accepting this huge responsibility and transferred it to human. His interpretation of "burden" gives primarily a negativ impression and later a positive one: when one undertakes the burden, first of all, its weight hunches one 's shoulder. But, it is in confrontation with the depression caused by this heavy burden, that a man learns to accept the life in its totality, either joyful or disappointing/frustrating. Also, Neitzsche considers thought as the heaviest burden, the thought that comes to you …show more content…
But in loneliness and internal life of an individual, sign cannot be the sign of something else, because in this loneliness, words that attack the consciousness are merely meanings, all discharged of any indicative function. If this attack happens in solitude, thought acts in its purest capacity, discharged of any indicative function, with merely expressive function. I believe, even though Nietzsche and Husserl may diverge in many perspectives, they do converge at this point. They both find the end of the thought in loneliness and solitude, where the words do not serve for communication, but for shedding light/illuminate for/on an individual. Every word as a sign has both indicative and expressive functions. But, in solitude, the word intertwined with thought, has merely an expressive function that is the difficult act of bearing the meaning; that 's why Nietzsche calls it the heaviest burden. An individual 's confrontation with the demon has to happen in solitude to bear a new meaning for life. It is then that the loneliest loneliness stands at such a supreme position that an individual could be able to bear the burden, that according to Hafez, even the universe cannot …show more content…
Nietzsche specifically speaks about the possibility of meaning of life and bearing the burden of life in the condition of "that which must come". This is the eternal return of the same. Zoroastra defines the condition of bearing of life as the underestanding of the eternal recurrent situation. What does he see in future that helps him bear the life? He responds that "And all my creating and striving amounts to this, that I create and piece together into one, what is now fragment and riddle and grisly accident." He sees past in future and here is the point that he presents his famous formula of redemption that helps bearing the difficult riddle of life: "To redeem those who are the past and to recreate all ‘it was’ into ‘thus I willed it!’ – only that would I call redemption!" Therefore, to