Nietzsche On Abortion Essay

Improved Essays
In this day and age, everyone has their own opinion, especially when it comes to topics such as abortion. Abortion is something that is heavily debated in today’s society. It is more than just labeling someone who is a Democrat as being for abortion and someone who is a Republican as being against abortion. Most everyone has his or her own opinion for why he or she thinks abortion is moral or immoral. This paper is going to address how three important philosophers would view abortion. The three philosophers that are going to be addressed are Friedrich Nietzsche, Aristotle, and last but not least John Stuart Mill. It is important to note that these three philosophers are not living today. Therefore, their views are conducted based off what they …show more content…
This phrase ultimately means that people are capable in going above and beyond and past their capabilities. Also, everyone can improve and better him or herself. Nietzsche believes in something called an overman. An overman is someone that can be characterized as overcoming who they are. It is important to note that this is not an endpoint but a journey. One other thing Nietzsche believes in is not giving up. This would ultimately result in not having the “will to power”. With all of this prior information, I believe that, in most cases, Nietzsche would agree the abortion is immoral. For example, if a child were diagnosed with a disorder like Down syndrome or something of that sort then that child would obviously have a hard life growing up. Not only that but also the mother may be too young and might not be able to provide an adequate life for the child. I still believe Nietzsche would agree that abortion is immoral in this case. This is because the mother would be essentially giving up and not demonstrating the “will to power” by deciding to have the abortion. Using …show more content…
He is one to believe in Eudemonia. Eudemonia is something that brings happiness. According to Aristotle, happiness is the chief good of human beings. In order to achieve Eudemonia you must die. I don’t believe that Aristotle would agree that abortion would lead to Eudemonia for the child, in most cases, because it is essentially taking the child’s life away without giving the child a chance to achieve happiness. If a woman chooses abortion then her child will never have the opportunity to have virtues instilled. When speaking in terms of the mother, she will never be able to achieve Eudemonia. This is because she will never be able to be an ideal person as she has taken the life of her own child in a sense, whether there was good reason for her choice or not. Aristotle believes that people’s experiences can give them character or virtue. For example, if a woman who was raped decided to have the child she would have the chance to develop a strong will power. However, if she chose to have the abortion she would never have that character or virtue. Aristotle would agree that abortion is impermissible or good to not practice. However, I do believe that Aristotle would agree that abortion would only be permissible if it occurred before the onset of life. Overall, I believe Aristotle would agree that abortion should be illegal unless it somehow leads to happiness, which could possibly occur in a rape

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    And she also says that in extreme cases where the life of the mother is at stake and the pregnancy is due to rape then we cannot come to the conclusion that the morality of abortion depends on moral status of the fetus. This is because regardless of a fetus assumed to have moral status, it does not enforce that the woman is morally obliged to allow the fetus to use her body for 9 months. (Thomson, 54-57) To expand further, Thomson says an abortion is moral when the woman has not assumed a “special responsibility” for the fetus such as allowing the pregnancy to last longer than the normal time to abort. She believes that choosing one’s body over the fetus who is innocent with a right to life is not morally wrong as long as the killing is not done unjustly.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why choose abortion? Abortion is seen as a necessity right because a women shouldn’t need a reason to not want to be pregnant. In the article “Abortion With Apology”, Katha Pollitt persuasively argues that it is simply the woman’s body and nothing should stand in the way of what she wants for herself. Pollitt asks, “What’s praiseworthy about bearing more children than you can--or want to--take care of?” (Abortion Without Apology).…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis Abortion

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I will argue that abortion is not immoral by analyzing two ethical theories natural law and ethical egoism, analyzing Don Marquis’ conclusion of abortion, and discussing my personal position…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this woman was to not receive the abortion and was to raise the baby, she would probably feel pain/resentment towards this child. In exchange, the child could pick up on this resentment and also feel unhappy. So this action might actually not produce happiness. This would result in pain for the mother and child. However, if the woman was able to receive an abortion, there would be only one person’s emotional feelings to integrate into society instead of having two people.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bailey Washington Mr. Reynolds Philosophy MWF 8:30 1 December 2016 Thomson vs. Hursthouse In this paper I will be comparing and contrasting Thomsons A Defense of Abortion and Hursthouses Virtue Theory and Abortions. Also in my paper I will be sharing my opinion on abortion and which view I agree with.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical critique on the traditional argument against abortion Robert Bertram - UBC ID: 24675373 Phil 333 (001) - Biomedical Ethics The University of British Columbia The concept of morality in relation to abortion is a significant cause of conflict. These moral ambiguities are put into question by Pope John Paul II’s excerpts on the “unspeakable crime of abortion” with regards to the validity, committed fallacies, and the fetus’s content to the right to life (Paul II, 1995, pg. 1). Paul II's Evangelium Vitae (1995), states that aborting a fetus is the "deliberate and direct killing...of a human being in the initial phase of his or her existence". In the paragraphs to follow, this essay will reconstruct the argument, and analyze Thomson's, and Warren's objection to Paul II's statement.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hills Like White Elephants Critical Response Essay The issue presented in this work is one that continues on today. How pro-life and pro-choice individuals approach the moral dilemma of abortion. Immediately there is a dismissive tone set by “The American”.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s societies around the world, there is currently two factions of the highly controversial topic of abortion and whether it should be allowed or outlawed. These two factions on opposite sides are pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-choice supporters in essence believes a woman has the right to an abortion if she decides to do so. On the other hand, pro-life supporters believe the fetus is its own human being and has the right to live, thus an abortion cannot be performed on the woman. Judith Jarvis Thomson, a philosophy professor supports the right to an abortion in her paper, “A defense of Abortion” (186).…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion, in its nature, is considered to be a hugely controversial subject, with pro and anti choice sides levelling various reasons at each other as to why abortion is, or is not, ok. In this essay I intend to discuss whether or not abortion is an individual choice or economic necessity, based off the theories and reasoning of Mary Wollstonecraft, J.S Mill and Karl Marx, and from each authors perspective and what we can perhaps deduce about their thoughts. The phrase 'politics of abortion' can strike up various meanings for people; it essentially invokes the ever ongoing struggle for women's reproductive rights, and fighting for reproductive rights traditionally means that there is a focus on issues of agency or control, and who has the…

    • 2041 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With this given, I would strongly support a woman’s right to do an abortion under certain circumstance of rape or unplanned pregnancy. Although it is mentioned that, “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life.” (Thomson, J.), it cannot be morally wrong to commit murder towards the fetus if the mother is doing an act of self defense in this case to save her own life. Thomson states that a fetus has a right to life at the moment of conception (Thomson, J.) but thoroughly explains how the fetus cannot overweigh the pregnant woman’s right of life so therefore, it does not begin at the moment of…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the horrifying reality linked to abortion, the debate about allowing abortion in a moral society has never ceased. There are various ethical theories that would support abortion based on some arguments. The theory argues that the moral rightness is based on the total good the consequences of a certain activity (Sinnott-Armstrong, 1). According to the consequentialist ethical theory, a consequentialist would first enquire on the consequences allowing the abortion and not allowing abortion. The people who support this theory would want to know the action that would produce the greatest goodness for either the child or the mother.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One day Socrates went to the park to run as training for the 5k run he signed up to do. After running two miles, he decided to stop for a short break. As he was sitting in a bench at the park, a young women sat angrily down next to him to receive a phone. Janice: Claire, listen to me you cannot follow through with it. It is precious life inside of you.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Catholic Social Teachings consider the issue of abortion unethical. In regards to Situation ethics the most loving thing to do would be to look out for the mothers’ wellbeing, and to prioritise the mother over the foetus.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays