Nichiren's Letter To Mongol Envoys

Improved Essays
Nichiren’s religious vision is competitive, harsh, critical and aggressive. In his letter to Nishiyama Nyudo in 1275, Nichiren discusses the execution of Mongol envoys, and the possible Mongol invasion to come. Nichiren writes, “I have also received your news about the beheading of the Mongol envoys. How pitiful that they have beheaded the innocent Mongol envoys and yet failed to cut off the heads of the priests of the Nembutsu, Shingon, Zen, and Ritsu sects, who are the real enemies of the country…Among all grave matters, the ruin of the nation is the most serious. The Saishōō Sutra states, ‘Among all forms of harm, none is heavier than the loss of the ruler’s authority.’ This passage means that among all evils, the worst is to become the ruler, misgovern the country, and meet defeat at the hands of another kingdom” (qtd from Yampolsky, 443-44). It is apparent that Nichiren expresses a greater concern for other existing Buddhist sects than he does an eventual move of aggression from the Mongols. In Dialogue IX of the Risshōankokuron, titled …show more content…
In fact, I would argue that in these statements, we may uncover a level of national pride and patriotism in Nichiren’s views. Nichiren falls under the category of a religious nationlist because, simply put, he utilizes his dogma to try and influence governmental change. Additionally, in the second excerpt, Nichiren explicitly calls on the “people” to partake in “saving” Japan by engaging in prayer. Perhaps it is a common trend in nationalist figures to call on the power of the people to affect change, and while the entirety of the Risshōankokuron is itself a treatise demanding religious reform, Nichiren also makes a direct link between national wellbeing to religious affiliation. From here, I would argue that Nichiren’s patriotism for Japan also heavily manifests itself through the disapproval he espouses for other religious groups and Buddhist

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Genghis Khan and the Mongols were willing to go to great lengths to succeed in conquering Asia. In fact, they went much too far. Although they did do many great things for the economy of the towns they conquered, and they held many admirable beliefs, that does not excuse the fact that they killed a very large amount of people and they did so in terrible ways. Genghis Khan had incredibly strict rules for his men. Document 2 states that if a group of 10 people flee from battle, then the other 90 people that were part of that group all get put to death.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 13th century, a small tribe from the steppes of Central Asia had conquered most of the known world at the time. Mongols rode on the back of horses, as they swept most of Asia, the Middle East and Eastern Europe. It has never been seen before at the time, they had even taken over more land than Alexander the Great, the mongols taking 4,860,000 square miles of land. (Document 1). The mongols were fearless warriors who took over people's land yet they weren't as barbaric as they seem.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Q: How barbaric were the barians? About eight hundred years ago, a small tribe in the steppes of central Asia were newly ruled by *Temujin. They conquered much of the known world. Mongol warriors fought on horse back. They took over most of asia the middle east, and eastern Europe.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mongol Empire was the greatest empire ever. Its region reached out from the Yellow Sea in eastern Asia to the outskirts of eastern Europe. At different times it included China, Korea, Mongolia, Persia (now Iran), Turkestan, and Armenia. It additionally included parts of Burma, Vietnam, Thailand, and Russia. The Mongols, who inevitably got to be known as the Tatars, were the most barbaric victors of history.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Heinrich Von Treitschke: Warfare and Nationalism to gain Liberation Germany faced the worst era of political imperial leadership, which suppressed the economy. During the nineteenth-century, Europe had many historical nationalists who studied their history and then glorified their nation's past (Kohn 21). A historian named Heinrich Von Treitschke vastly influenced Germans through his, political speech, named “The Greatness of War” shifting Germany’s perspective on the needs of the citizen’s committing to the country’s needs before theirs. My goal in this paper is to elaborate on how Treitschke impacted Germany’s view and nations mission by providing background history of Germany during the nineteenth century and connecting it to how Heinrich was glorious in bringing…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Can Syed's piece be considered a nationalistic document? Why or why not? A nationalistic document is “a document that supports or explains the commonalities that make a group a nation.”…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongol Empire By Stefan From 1206 to 1366 the Mongols took over so much land they had the largest contiguous land empire in history. The Mongols were so big and important they impacted not only everyone in Europe and Asia, but they impacted the entire world history. It is believed that they impacted the world in a positive way. For example, the Mongols influenced the creation of new inventions by bringing new ideas and materials into different lands, combining cultures and raw materials.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anthony Smith sets the rhetorical question: (1)"Where, after all, lay the reasons for the existence of every nation (if you distinguish it from the state), if not in the cultivation of its unique (or perceived as unique) cultural value? Ethnic differences remain the terms ‘sine qua non’ and that means shared myths about ancestor’s common historical memories, unique cultural traits and sense of difference - if not chosen by God - all elements typical of the ethnic communities of the pre-modern era. They must be maintained in the modern nation, so it won’t be invisible.” His statement that "nations have deep roots" can be traced back to the national identity. This idea is also emphasized in the work of Alvin and Heidi Toffler(2), whose description…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Mongols created the largest empire in all of history. The land they had conquered is more than two times that of the next greatest conqueror, Alexander the Great. But unlike Alexander, who is often remembered as a hero, the legacy of the Mongols is one of brutality and barbarism. But in truth, these so-called “barbarians” were, in fact, not very barbaric at all. Recent discoveries challenged the long-accepted statement of Mongols being savage brutes, suggesting that they were perhaps wrongly labelled; the facts about them were twisted and lost to history.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negatives Of Mongols

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine this, you are a Chinese peasant living in the 1200s minding your own business farming; then suddenly, flaming arrows are fly out of nowhere, the sound of war horns roar in the distance and mounted warriors are riding around slaughtering your fellow townspeople. Who are these evil people? They are the Mongols! Not only will they kill your townspeople, but also will end up killing millions of people across Eurasia and create the largest land empire in history. One may think that this is another history lesson to collect dust the shelf, but little do people know that the Mongols had left a large impression, both positive and negative, on the world that helped shape what it is today.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols and the Europeans had many characteristics that were similar and characteristics that set them apart. They both had strong attributes that set them apart from any other group of people; they were powerful in their own way. It was the Mongols during the third wave civilizations era that created the largest and influential empire of that millennium. Their empire reached all the way to Eastern Europe and it was the Mongols that brought regions together into a single interacting network. The Comparing and contrasting of two expansive cultures will provide us with a better understand of how their connection pushed us into the global integration of the modern era.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were horse riding people that began gaining power in 1130 A.D and their empire collapsed in late 1368 A.D. They were known for their warfare methods, which were extremely unique at the time because they rode on horseback and completely destroyed every surrounding civilization they went into war with. The Mongols were also known for having one of the most iniquitous rulers of all time, Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan then passed the empire on to his grandson, Kublai Khan. Throughout this paper I will be discussing how the Mongol Empire was founded, how their education system worked, daily life, housing, how horses became such a big part of the Mongol Empire, Genghis Khan being in power, warfare for the Mongols, passing the empire on to Kublai Khan, and contributing factors of the empire ending in 1368.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    So many of the problems they face today as a country and as a world are the result of ignorance and ethnocentrism. The misguided War on Terror, one of the more important examples in our time, is the result of religious and cultural intolerance on both sides. In her essay “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism,” Martha Nussbaum argues that to remedy such issues, they should forgo their nationalist tendencies and view themselves first and foremost as citizens of the world, or cosmopolitans. Most of her suggestions are well taken, but her belief that “national boundaries are morally irrelevant and that patriotism is altogether poisonous” (Nussbaum 1994) may be taking the idea too far, and in a very impractical direction. In this paper, I will argue for…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sydney J. Harris Analysis

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In societies perspective, patriotism and nationalism represent contrasting values depending on the individual being asked. Although, in my personal opinion nationalism and patriotism are two very similar matters that can drive into two paths; a negative or positive direction. Furthermore, Sydney J. Harris reflects that statement as he establishes an idea of what patriotism and nationalism distinctly represent in his opinionated claim. Sydney J. Harris’s source supports the negative outlook on nationalism and positive viewpoint on patriotism. In addition, the Sydney J. Harris demonstrates this through specific words choices, firm tone of the source and accentuating the clear gap between nationalism and patriotism.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongol Empire (1200 – 1400 CE) was arguably the largest land empire of the time. To date, it is the second largest empire in landmass ever, second only to the British Empire. At its height, it had covered an area of over 33 million km3; it is estimated to have had a population of over 100 million people. The expansive empire was birthed through the leadership of Genghis Khan in 1206 [also referred to as Chinggis Khan]. It stretched from China to the east to as far as current day Iraq to the west (Brent, 1976).…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays