In fact, I would argue that in these statements, we may uncover a level of national pride and patriotism in Nichiren’s views. Nichiren falls under the category of a religious nationlist because, simply put, he utilizes his dogma to try and influence governmental change. Additionally, in the second excerpt, Nichiren explicitly calls on the “people” to partake in “saving” Japan by engaging in prayer. Perhaps it is a common trend in nationalist figures to call on the power of the people to affect change, and while the entirety of the Risshōankokuron is itself a treatise demanding religious reform, Nichiren also makes a direct link between national wellbeing to religious affiliation. From here, I would argue that Nichiren’s patriotism for Japan also heavily manifests itself through the disapproval he espouses for other religious groups and Buddhist
In fact, I would argue that in these statements, we may uncover a level of national pride and patriotism in Nichiren’s views. Nichiren falls under the category of a religious nationlist because, simply put, he utilizes his dogma to try and influence governmental change. Additionally, in the second excerpt, Nichiren explicitly calls on the “people” to partake in “saving” Japan by engaging in prayer. Perhaps it is a common trend in nationalist figures to call on the power of the people to affect change, and while the entirety of the Risshōankokuron is itself a treatise demanding religious reform, Nichiren also makes a direct link between national wellbeing to religious affiliation. From here, I would argue that Nichiren’s patriotism for Japan also heavily manifests itself through the disapproval he espouses for other religious groups and Buddhist