Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

Improved Essays
Every government has a king, prince, queen, president etc. They are in charge of maintaining leadership and control within the people and the states. In Machiavelli’s work “The Prince,” the ideal prince should be wise, thoughtful, and versatile. Wise in his way he runs the kingdom. Thoughtful in the way he communicates with his people of the kingdom and takes their concern into consideration. Lastly, a prince should be versatile. He should be able to adjust and handle both his duty a ruler and his personal life, while also being well rounded. Fist and foremost, a prince must be wise. He needs to find a way to stay on the throne for as long as possible and to do that he needs to run the kingdom accordingly. A wise prince should always portray …show more content…
A thoughtful prince always thinks about others before making a decision. Machiavelli said, “ It is therefore necessary for him to have the ability to change his mind according to the way the winds of fortune and conditions required” (288). This means an ideal prince must be thoughtful and think about all the possible outcomes. The ideal prince should not jeopardize a good outcome because of his pride, but at the same time, he should make a decision in which he feels is beneficial for the whole kingdom. Machiavelli also mentions, “ A prince should be very careful that nothing ever comes from his mouth that is not full of aforementioned qualities” (288). This means a prince should always speak good thoughts. This plays a big role in being a thoughtful prince in the sense that the prince always has to be accounted for what he says. The people look up to the prince as a leader and as a person. Therefore, a prince should always be thoughtful when it comes to running a kingdom. Adding on to that, being thoughtful could only benefit the prince because it will make the people cherish him and want to keep him on the reign for a long time. For example Machiavelli said, “If a prince has a great reputation, it is difficult to plot against him or to attack him as long as he is thought to have great ability and the respect of hi subjects” (289). This shows one of the many pros of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccoló Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513 after witnessing Italy's political decline. In this book he highlights how a ruler can maintain his power and lead an effective government by any means necessary. Compared to Louis XI of France, Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain, Henry VII is the most Machiavellian…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Would Socrates Support a Machiavellian System? During a time of political turmoil, it is hard to know who to trust, and who should lead. In “The Prince” Machiavelli lists a plethora of guidelines as to how a prince should gain political power along with ways for them to ensure this power is long-lasting. Although Socrates and Machiavelli both lived in time periods with serious political issues, Socrates would not support Machiavelli’s concept of a Prince, or any type of government created as a result of Machiavellian principles.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyday people take advantage of their power that ends up affecting others around them negatively. Power has a negative effect on other people because the person who holds the power becomes arrogant and become power hungry. In Antigone, King Creon feels no one should be antagonistic towards him since he is the ultimate power and he is on a higher platform than everyone else. Creon shows that power creates arrogance's by him saying “This girl is guilty of a double insolence, Breaking the laws given and boasting of it.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He brought glory in the form of money to his home country. Thus, the positive outcomes cancel out the negative actions. Political philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli--writer of The Prince-- would earlier align this philosophy along with his own through defining the goal of a leader is not to be loved and make ethical decisions, but to choose the best option for his or her country. Early 16th to 19th century pirates illustrated this ideology along with…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are many qualities of leadership that contribute to creating a strong leader. Enchiridion, “Life of Lycurgus,” “Allegory of the Cave,” and “Life of Pericles” each speak about the traits of a leader and how those qualities affect the stability of a state. However, there are traits that, more than others, exemplifies qualities that help the stability of the state. Although a leader filled with passion is an imperative, a strong leader perseveres holding onto his restraint when making decisions regarding city-state affairs to keep stability.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Very rarely have a seen a man consult others before making a decision. As a leader you have to be willing to listen to others and not just make decisions based on what you think is best. I think humility is a skill a lot of women posses. As women, we can be strong and assertive, but still have humility. I think that is key, to be able to listen to others, but when it comes down to make a decision you are confident enough to make…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a leader, one must know when to take charge, when to let go, and when not to force everything to go one’s way. A leader must also be fair-minded because all citizens should be given the opportunity to support themselves. Being fair-minded earns respect, and a leader without respect is not a leader. Humility…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicollo Machiavelli and Martin Luther were both prominent figures in world history, and both left a significant impact in their own way. For Machiavelli, the focus was on government and politics, while Luther was generally more concerned with religion and the corruption from within. Both men left their mark, and they both had stark differences in their campaigns, but delving deep enough into their works shows that they also had striking similarities in what they viewed as flaws or faults in leadership. “I conclude that since men love at their own inclination but can be made to fear at the inclination of the prince, a shrewd prince will lay his foundations on what is under his own control.” For Nicollo Machiavelli, the general idea behind…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince, it is almost impossible to be a successful leader and a moral person in the Christian point of view. A good leader needed to know how to keep the empire safe, but he also needed to keep the interest of the citizens. Once the citizens understood this basic requirement, they stood to be less disappointed, and clear about what they need from their rulers. In Europe, the Renaissance was being experienced. During this period, the revival of the arts, politics, literature, and economics, brought with it social disorder, and socioeconomic instability.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli in The Prince is primarily a practical observer and diplomat analyst prescribing numerous ethical and political instructions to Cesar Borgia for pyramidical maintenance, sustenance and enhancement of political power at various stages of capturing, nurturing, preserving and augmenting power and absolute power for the prince. Hobbes’s aim in his Leviathan is similar to that of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Both are equally concerned for bringing about order out of chaotic civil war like situation in England and arbitrary ruler in Italy respectively. Hobbes is making an all-out effort to create an edifice and basis of scientific foundation for the need of a sovereign power through his so called scientific materialism. That is why he discusses at length human nature, psyche and need for sociological order in society.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Prince, in contrast, is a tyranny and bares tension with republicanism. A tyranny is exactly what is identified as a bad counterpart in the Discourses. This distinction does strain the potential relationship between the two texts, yet this is only validated if the two texts are read in mutual exclusion and without the consideration of external historical…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “All states or dominions which hold or have held sway over mankind are either republics or monarchies” (Machiavelli, 5). Machiavelli states that both monarchies and republics are the most widespread, used forms of government; however, as Machiavelli critiques the way monarchies are run, specifically in Florence under the Medici family, The Prince highlights how republics could be more beneficial. Although The Prince, by Niccolò Machiavelli, discusses both forms of government, the text is still largely relevant to contemporary society. One example of this is that the overall ideas from the text are still practiced in modern politics and culture, fiction and nonfiction. Furthermore, Machiavelli predicted the outcome of fallen monarchies, which…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays