Niccolo Machiavelli's Argument The Prince

Improved Essays
Even admitting Machiavelli was autograph in a apple absolutely altered to that of our own, his thoughts and theories are still animate in our association today. (Machiavellian Backroom 2011) Backroom has afflicted over the years and it is definately not the aforementioned as it was on 1513 if Machiavelli wrote his argument The Prince, but capital groundsills of the backroom accept remained the same. Therefore abounding Machiavelli’s account can be able-bodied acclimated in our society.
Machiavelli’s arguments accept been echoed and accustomed by writers and statesmen from his own time to the present day. Machiavelli’s constant addition to political thought, action and convenance is the appreciably airy abstraction that backroom involves ir even requires the arete or the abuse of accustomed moral principles; that fraud, force, lies and abandon are justified because they are all-important for political success. (Harris, Lock, Rees 2000)
Maureen Ramsay says in Machiavelli, Marketing and Management
…show more content…
Machiavellian approach are abnormally difficult to absolve in backroom because consequentialist calculation, the absolution for abandoned agency have to in the aboriginal instance depend on judgements about the account or amount of the ends they achieve. In convenance it is difficult to authorize a about accustomed political end which would legitimize or alibi acts of ability politics. Fraud, force, lies and abandon are rarely the alone alternatives in politics, the all-embracing abuse acquired by them frequently outweighs yhe acceptable advised and their use generally has counterproductive effects. The accepted use of these agency can base and advance with abiding after-effects adverse to the accessible interests as was apparent by case of Hitler and Stalin for example. (Harris, Lock, Rees

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli advocates that the betterment of the state’s popularity should be the prince’s top priority over doing the right thing. However, he emphasizes that it is crucial…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli is smart and a strategic author. There are many ways on how to interpret his famous work, “The Prince”. It is intriguing that Machiavelli did not provide a title for the book. In doing so, Machiavelli shows his strategic writing to challenge the reader. To read the book and accept it in a literal sense is questionable.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Science of Machiavelli Machiavelli’s analytical tone and calculating demeanor, along with relevant historical examples to back up his claims, make his approach to politics extremely scientific. He sets up a foundation of effective practices for leaders to utilize, and his lack of concern for moral issues allow his work to transcend older political thought. He focuses on the preservation of the state as the main objective of a leader, and he advocates all means necessary to achieve that goal. The first scientific aspect of Machiavelli’s work that differentiates it from other political discourse is the fact that he thinks religion should have no place in the workings of a government.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Often he calls men weak and unable to stand up for what is right, but never does he say that the public cannot detect what is right vs. what is wrong. However Machiavelli sees the public as, "ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, and covetous (Machiavelli XVII)." and most importantly easily controlled. The Price reads as a how-to guide on easily manipulating men; Machiavelli believes as a ruler you can rely on the people not speaking out against you as long as you appear to be virtuous.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    angas In 1513, the Italian diplomat, writer, and philosopher Niccoló Machiavelli released his political treatise titled De Principatibus, or The Prince. His book not only formed the basis for political science and is considered one of the first works of modern philosophy, but also stressed many ideas that remain controversial in modern day politics. One of the more prominent ideas in Machiavelli’s masterpiece is that the ends of one’s actions justify how they got there. This idea that someone’s accomplishments rationalize how they got there has been present in both film and literature for hundreds of years.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    hy an entry on Machiavelli? That question might naturally and legitimately occur to anyone encountering an entry about him in an encyclopedia of philosophy. Certainly, Machiavelli contributed to a large number of important discourses in Western thought—political theory most notably, but also history and historiography, Italian literature, the principles of warfare, and diplomacy. But Machiavelli never seems to have considered himself a philosopher—indeed, he often overtly rejected philosophical inquiry as beside the point—nor do his credentials suggest that he fits comfortably into standard models of academic philosophy. His writings are maddeningly and notoriously unsystematic, inconsistent and sometimes self-contradictory.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli in The Prince is primarily a practical observer and diplomat analyst prescribing numerous ethical and political instructions to Cesar Borgia for pyramidical maintenance, sustenance and enhancement of political power at various stages of capturing, nurturing, preserving and augmenting power and absolute power for the prince. Hobbes’s aim in his Leviathan is similar to that of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Both are equally concerned for bringing about order out of chaotic civil war like situation in England and arbitrary ruler in Italy respectively. Hobbes is making an all-out effort to create an edifice and basis of scientific foundation for the need of a sovereign power through his so called scientific materialism. That is why he discusses at length human nature, psyche and need for sociological order in society.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What makes one happy may not always be the right thing to do. In both The Prince and in The Consolation of Philosophy; themes of happiness, virtue, religion and fortune are investigated further to explain the relation of each in a political arena. In The Consolation of Philosophy, Boethius deals with the universal experience of suffering. He is imprisoned and facing execution. Boethius blames fortune for the reason of his suffering, “Surely the severity of Fortune’s attack on me needs no further mention” (pg. 9).…

    • 2074 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Victor Hugo says in Les Miserables, "Machiavelli is not an evil genius, nor a demon, nor a cowardly and miserable writer; he is nothing but the fact…" making it clear that contrary to the dominant belief he sees Machiavelli to just be the narrator of thing around him. Machiavelli’s, book the prince has been the centre of debate since the time it was written owing to its insight in the matters involving virtu, morality, fortuna, freewill, authority to exercise power and power itself. It is important to highlight that in the pre-Machiavellian times it was the idea/ understanding of morality that governed whether or not the authority was deemed legitimate(Nederman 2005). With a belief that righteousness had a great deal to play in legitimacy…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli, however, cares little to none on human nature other than how best to understand and therefore manipulate it. He is in stark contrast to More, operating on the darker facets of society. Manipulation, deception and trickery are his speciality. Machiavelli's Prince pushes that a ruler be feared rather than…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli believes that the ruler must take things into his hands and not depend on God to help him rule. The ruler has to work and be worthy of the…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up in such a tumultuous era allowed Niccolò Machiavelli to examine many cases of the rise and subsequent fall of short-lived governments as well as their causes, such as constantly changing alliances. These experiences led to a cynical view of human nature along with a clear understanding of the objectionable behavior necessary to retain power in politics. His career as a politician and diplomat cemented his very pragmatic stance on human nature and the nature of politics, both of which are described throughout The Prince. Unlike fellow philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, who preferred to hypothesize based on ideals, Machiavelli held the contentious belief that a separation between politics and moral philosophy was the necessary…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Unlike the ancients, Machiavelli did not construct his principles on how the world or government “ought to be.” In this paper I will provide an account of Machiavelli’s critique of the ancient political theorist and how he utilizes the notion of fortune in that critique. In Chapter 15 of “The Prince” the conversation of how princes should be toward his “subjects and friends.” He gives reference that many people have given their advice on this subject, but his intentions are not to be “presumptuous.”…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays