How Did Niccolo Machiavelli's Impact On Politics

Superior Essays
The Impact of Machiavelli’s The Prince on Modern Day Politics Over the course of the last five centuries, Niccolo Machiavelli has been considered by many scholars as one of the most controversial historical figures of the Renaissance period. As a keen observer of the Italian oligarchy, he saw that the “Italian city-states were ruled by men whose authority rested solely on their cunning and effective use of force, which was witnessed as a new phenomenon” (Perry, 186). Additionally, Machiavelli believed in the unification of the Italian city-states into one single state. With this in mind, he wrote his controversial political treatise The Prince (Il Principe). The Prince serves as a manual for potential leaders, capable of unifying a country and protecting it by any means necessary (Perry, 186). Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince has been labeled throughout the history as a controversial, immoral and an unscrupulous political manual; however, the ideas The Prince provides will aid an up-and-coming political …show more content…
His manual The Prince is a crucial set of principles that "it [is] morally and tactically wrong to apply to political action the moral standars appropriate to private life and personal relations" ( Nikitin, par. 8). What Machiavelli teaches us is the importance that politics are a separate matter and should not be tied with religious undertones or our personal values. Above all, Machiavelli emphasizes that, " the question is not whether one human being should have the right to make such terrifying determinations" but it is "the essence of power, even in a democracy, is to use violence to protect the republic" (Ignatieff, par.9). Thus, where there are "good arms, there must be good laws" (Zuckert, 495). In short, modern-day leaders need to accept that politics require the use of dirty hands and that their own personal morals and values are not meant to be a part of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli advocates that the betterment of the state’s popularity should be the prince’s top priority over doing the right thing. However, he emphasizes that it is crucial…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli begins with more protectionist view of the congregation, in that the people did not need laws before they felt the need, which shows to prove that the people living in the Machiavelli’s idea of state of nature wished for physical protections first, rather than legal protections over their properties. In contrast, Locke theorizes that the people voluntarily decided to gather to establish a contract between the sovereignty and the people, so that the property rights can be protected. The aim of the government is explicitly stated, and the establishment of the legislative branch being concurrent to the establishment of the executive body implicitly point to the motivation of the social cohesion. However, it is arguable that Machiavellian rationale for the institution of a republican government gradually evolves into the one that is alike to the Lockean rationale for sovereignty, in that the legislation of the constitution is due to the societal pressure to punish those who may harm the others. The mutual agreement for a need of the legislation can be practically identical to consenting to an establishment for civil…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having faith in the leaders was far away from what Machiavelli stimulated, “[…] men are a sorry lot and will not keep their promises to you, and you likewise need not keep yours to them.” (230) plotting, treason, and unlawfulness is what was anticipated from his people. He found that, “they are ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger, greedy for gain” (228). He found that the obligation of the prince was to rule as he wanted without the say of the…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Around 1513, Niccoló Machiavelli wrote The Prince, analyzing political power and laying out advice on how to be an effective ruler. Focusing primarily on ways in which to obtain authority, gain an obedient following, and maintain power, Machiavelli forms an argument that it is better to be a leader that is feared than loved. In other words, Machiavelli stresses that effective political power is reduced to the manipulation of others and the preservation of a ruler’s individual power. By comparing the use of political power by leaders like Machiavelli and St. Catherine of Siena, through their egocentric versus altruistic attitudes, views on corruption, and understanding of control, the contrast between their collectivist and individualistic approaches highlight the long-term benefits of ruling for the…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was born in 1469 and died in 1527 and lived during the Italian Renaissance in Florence. He wrote The Prince, a specula principis or “mirror for princes,” when he was forty-four-years-old after being dismissed from being a diplomat because he was suspected of conspiring against the new government when there was a change of regime. He was found innocent and left town to live with his family in the countryside, where “he tramped the hills by day and, in the long, empty evenings, began to write down some considerations on how to win power and, above all, how to hold on to it, how not to be a victim of circumstance,” which resulted in The Prince (Parks VII). Machiavelli’s own reversal of fortune was not the only example of the…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli has a much more direct approach. In The Prince it is discussed that the prince should do what it takes to stay in power so that he may create change for the betterment of the country. He thinks that leaders should basically take the power and keep it. He believes it is okay for the leader to use force and tighten their grip when needed. When you are in power Machiavelli says you should be both loved and feared, but if you can’t be both you should be feared.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, Machiavelli is viewed as a callous and resourceful leader who emphasizes the pursuit of power and longevity, even if it advocates the use of violence preceding one’s own morals. This power-violence-morality trifecta illustrates the importance of balance in a leader’s pallet of desired qualities, while ultimately highlighting the impact a successful leader can have on a secular society. However, Machiavelli’s viewpoint of leadership expands beyond power, violence, and morality, and preaches the importance of establishing deception and fear in order to keep the stability of one’s state. The Prince delineates the idea of appearance and mendacity versus actual virtue, and states that it is better to look the part than…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ledeen wrote, “All manner of nastiness may be required to keep us under control (p.90).” Machiavelli says that a leader may have to “enter into evil” in order to balance the threat of human nature (p.93). It is comments like this that make Machiavelli both feared and admired, the very thing Machiavelli suggests a prince should strive for…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Prince, in contrast, is a tyranny and bares tension with republicanism. A tyranny is exactly what is identified as a bad counterpart in the Discourses. This distinction does strain the potential relationship between the two texts, yet this is only validated if the two texts are read in mutual exclusion and without the consideration of external historical…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A man never lived who contributed more to the evolution of the political landscape than Niccolo Machiavelli. Born in a turbulent place in an unstable and perilous period of history, Machiavelli learned the realities of a state. Machiavelli’s greatest work, The Prince, established Political Realism, the acknowledgment that an ideal society is unobtainable, and operating on this knowledge, the focus of those in power should be better spent on political stability, even if immoral action was required to maintain such stability. Without Machiavelli, the idea of a Republic, a state run by the people who reside within the nation under the shared law, whose purpose is to maintain justice and order through constitutional bindings, would not exist as…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays