Greek Federalism Analysis

Improved Essays
As the Greek people began to experiment with new political organization after the end of the Peloponnesian War, a type of federalism emerged that united groups of Greek settlements in several geographic areas including Messenia, Boeotia, and Thessaly. These federations, along with the remaining independent poleis and the rest of Greece, soon encountered a new issue resulting from the rise of Philip of Macedon to the north. While federalism was certainly a civilizational advancement for the Greeks, its existence, regardless of how far it had the potential to spread, could not have been enough to stop eminent Macedonian rule over the Greeks. To see what shaped Philip’s victory in Greece, it is necessary to look toward Thebes and the Boeotian federation. The origin of this lies in the Thebans’ assault and victory over Spartan hegemony. After Thebes had been liberated from Sparta in 379, they continue their fight until eventually it was successful in freeing Messenia from Spartan control, which had a hugely detrimental impact on the Spartan helot …show more content…
After the Thebans had released the helots and crippled Sparta, it no longer remained worthy of being a primary concern for Philip. Athens, on the other hand, still had some degree of influence that it had recovered following the Peloponnesian wars. Philip did not wish them to be his enemies, so he sent an embassy to ask “that his ancestral friendship (with the Athenians) continue (to exist).” Later the Athenians completely threw off ties with Philip by destroying the stele that recorded the treaty. This resulted from a variety of factors including “his goal to deprive the Athenians of their grain supply”, but the disagreement demonstrates that Philip is willing to accept the Athenians as opponents, whereas he seeks to maintain his relationship with

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better empire than the Athenian Empire. Charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people supporting and expanding the government; giving citizens many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger, and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than the Athenian government is because of the Roman Senate. The Roman Senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 425 BCE Sparta was losing badly to Athens and sued for peace but Athens refused. In 424 BCE Athens began to lose the war. In 421 BCE the first part of the war ended with a treaty called the Peace of Nicias. Both Sparta and Athens had to give up the territory they gained. The second phase of the Peloponnesian War began when Athens sent soldiers to Sicil, and it lasted from 415 BCE-404 BCE.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Hellenic Era the Athens rose as one of the greatest mainland powers in Greece. As they rose they decided to change their government from monarchy to aristocracy. Little did the Athenian society know that one change would be a turning point for the west’s view on government from then on. The creation of the Council of Areopaugus was the starting point for this change the council was for elders of noble families exclusively to rule the Athens. As trade began to increase in Athens a change to oligarchy government was made the aristocrats decided they also needed a say.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better than then the empire of Greece. Charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people to support and expand the government; giving citizens, many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than Greece is because of the Roman Senate. The Roman Senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Greek Era’s The text A Brief Overview of Classical Greece, written by Thomas Sakoulas demonstrates the hard times Greece had to overcome in this era. During the Stone Age, Greece was prospering. The Greeks were productive since the beginning of time, so they could make Greece successful. Sakoulas explained how the Greeks were found productive by writing,”A wealth of stone tools found in sites in Espirus, Thessaly, Macedonia, and the Peloponnese reveal the existence of flourishing Paleolithic and Mesolithic communities in the Greek mainland”(Sakoulas,4).…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harneet's Response Essay

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In reading the round 1 discussions it is clear that we came to similar conclusions as to which events portrayed the Greeks resisting Alexander’s enterprises the most. We all pulled from similar events; the revolt at Thebes, the Aegean war and the Peloponnesian revolt. The opinions of the state of unification of the Greeks, differs among the responses. In Harneet’s response I liked the focus on Sparta and the Peloponnesian revolt.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better than then the empire of Greece. charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people to support and expand the government; giving citizens, many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than Greece is because of the Roman senate. The Roman senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Chapters 1 to 4: Ancient Greece Geography, Government, Athens vs. Sparta, and Golden Age of Greece Study Guide – Use your online HA! textbook Directions: Using your handouts, notes, workbook, and online textbook, answer the following questions as thoroughly as you can. Fill in a response wherever you see “???.”…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strengthened his flank and lured the Persians in, and then surrounded them and attacked their flanks. King Darius had 26,000 soldiers and the Greek’s had 9,000 soldiers, and they still were successful. After King Darius I his son Xerxes returned and defeated the Spartans at Thermopylae (480 B.C.). During 480 B.C. the Greeks won an important naval battle, and the following year the Spartans defeated the Persians at Plataea which ended the…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Athens, Sparta, and Thebes all failed to create a lasting “Greek Empire.” While each polis had its own strengths and weaknesses, the poleis all failed for similar reasons. The poleis failed mainly due to almost constant power struggles, arrogance, and involvement in conflicts they should not have been involved in. Athens, Sparta, and Thebes all failed in spite of various strengths and due to various weaknesses. Athens’ strengths included its large size, large trireme navy, wealth, and democratic government.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Archaic Period of Greece refers to the period of time between 800-500 BC, and is one of the five periods that Ancient Greek history can be divided into. A particular aspect of life which played a significant role in Archaic Greek society is politics and the political structure held during the Archaic Period. Politics was a major influencer of Archaic Greek society, making it an aspect in which individuals of Archaic Greece where engaged in their everyday life. The Archaic period saw the advancements and changes in the political system, particularly with the introduction of laws into society by influential lawgivers, Draco and Solon. These laws influenced the members of Archaic Greek society in the manner they lived and participated in everyday…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Egypt, Mesopotamian, and Greece had such a huge evolutionary on their political systems. All these three places evolve in different ways ones faster than others. That’s why here I will be talking about religion, political, and laws. First, Greece had the biggest political change. The Persian king had a lot to do with the evolution.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Rising and Falling of the Greece Nowadays, people believed that Greek shaped the original culture of the Western civilization. It is also a junction for the Eastern and Western civilization. There are three significant periods of the Greeks: the Hellenic periods (2000-338 B.C.E), the Hellenistic period (336-323 B.C.E), and the period of the conquest by Roman (200-146 B.C.E). [ Page 54] During the periods, the people of Greece had the remarkable contribution on many careers, such as Science, Mathematics, Philosophy, Literature, Architecture, Politics, and Arts.…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World History Impact of Geographical Factors on the Greek and the Roman Empire Geography can be considered as one of the integral parts of the development of the Greek civilization. Notably, the geographical factors had a significant effect on the Greek social, political, and economic growth. One of the principal reasons why the Greece was majorly dominated by tiny states and some other independent towns as opposed to being dominated by one all-powerful king was the geographical status. The existence of mountainous terrain, the numerous offshore islands, as well as the numerous isolated valleys encouraged the residents to form other local power centers instead of relying on a single center of power.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many great military leaders in the ancient world, but none left a legacy like Macedonia’s Philip II, known simply as Philip of Macedon. Philip was the son of King Amyntas III born around 380 BC. After his father’s death, Philip became the leader in 359 BC (Biography.com). Being equally as famous for fathering Alexander III, affectionately known as Alexander the Great, Philip was a cunning strategist and commander conquering much of Greece. His diplomatic skills coupled with his army’s military might made Philip a nearly unstoppable force.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays